Martin Jakobi
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Martin Jakobi has a total of 81 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alexander Wilhelm Koch
Institute for Measurement Systems and Sensor Technology, Technical University of Munich, Theresienstr. 90, 80333 Munich, Germany
18 shared publications - Lukas Haas
IFM—Institute for Driver Assistance Systems and Connected Mobility, Kempten University of Applied Sciences, Junkerstraße 1A, 87734 Benningen, Germany
6 shared publications Alexander W. Koch
Institute for Measurement Systems and Sensor Technology, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Arcisstraße 21, Munich D-80333, Germany
5 shared publications- Arsalan Haider
IFM—Institute for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems and Connected Mobility, Kempten University of Applied Sciences, Junkersstrasse 1A, 87734 Benningen, Germany
5 shared publications - Johannes Roths
Photonics Lab of Munich University of Applied Sciences, Munich, Germany
5 shared publications - Kun Wang
TUM School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, 80937 Garching bei München, Germany
5 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
LiDAR Sensor Parameter Augmentation and Data-Driven Influence Analysis on Deep-Learning-Based People Detection
Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensor technology for people detection offers a significant advantage in data protection. However, to design these systems cost- and energy-efficiently, the relationship between the measurement data and final object detection output with deep neural networks (DNNs) has to be elaborated. Therefore, this paper presents augmentation methods to analyze the influence of the distance, resolution, noise, and shading parameters of a LiDAR sensor in real point clouds for people detection. Furthermore, their influence on object detection using DNNs was investigated. A significant reduction in the quality requirements for the point clouds was possible for the measurement setup with only minor degradation on the object list level. The DNNs PointVoxel-Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (PV-RCNN) and Sparsely Embedded Convolutional Detection (SECOND) both only show a reduction in object detection of less than 5% with a reduced resolution of up to 32 factors, for an increase in distance of 4 factors, and with a Gaussian noise up to and . In addition, both networks require an unshaded height of approx. 0.5 m from a detected person’s head downwards to ensure good people detection performance without special training for these cases. The results obtained, such as shadowing information, are transferred to a software program to determine the minimum number of sensors and their orientation based on the mounting height of the sensor, the sensor parameters, and the ground area under consideration, both for detection at the point cloud level and object detection level.Open AccessLiDAR Sensor Parameter Augmentation and Data-Driven Influence Analysis on Deep-Learning-Based People Detection
Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensor technology for people detection offers a significant advantage in data protection. However, to design these systems cost- and energy-efficiently, the relationship between the measurement data and final object detection output with deep neural networks (DNNs) has to be elaborated. Therefore, this paper presents augmentation methods to analyze the influence of the distance, resolution, noise, and shading parameters of a LiDAR sensor in real point clouds for people detection. Furthermore, their influence on object detection using DNNs was investigated. A significant reduction in the quality requirements for the point clouds was possible for the measurement setup with only minor degradation on the object list level. The DNNs PointVoxel-Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (PV-RCNN) and Sparsely Embedded Convolutional Detection (SECOND) both only show a reduction in object detection of less than 5% with a reduced resolution of up to 32 factors, for an increase in distance of 4 factors, and with a Gaussian noise up to and . In addition, both networks require an unshaded height of approx. 0.5 m from a detected person’s head downwards to ensure good people detection performance without special training for these cases. The results obtained, such as shadowing information, are transferred to a software program to determine the minimum number of sensors and their orientation based on the mounting height of the sensor, the sensor parameters, and the ground area under consideration, both for detection at the point cloud level and object detection level. - Open Access
- 17 January 2024
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Access
- Vol. 12, 13020-13036
Modeling of Motion Distortion Effect of Scanning LiDAR Sensors for Simulation-Based Testing
Automated vehicles use light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors for environmental scanning. However, the relative motion between the scanning LiDAR sensor and objects leads to a distortion of the point cloud. This phenomenon is known as the motion distortion effect, significantly degrading the sensor’s object detection capabilities and generating false negative or false positive errors. In this work, we have introduced ray tracing-based deterministic and analytical approaches to model the motion distortion effect on the scanning LiDAR sensor’s performance for simulation-based testing. In addition, we have performed dynamic test drives at a proving ground to compare real LiDAR data with the motion distortion effect simulation data. The real-world scenarios, the environmental conditions, the digital twin of the scenery, and the object of interest (OOI) are replicated in the virtual environment of commercial software to obtain the synthetic LiDAR data. The real and the virtual test drives are compared frame by frame to validate the motion distortion effect modeling. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), the occupied cell ratio (OCR), and the Barons cross-correlation coefficient (BCC) are used to quantify the correlation between the virtual and the real LiDAR point cloud data. The results show that the deterministic approach matches the real measurements better than the analytical approach for the scenarios in which the yaw rate of the ego vehicle changes rapidly.
- 17 January 2024
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Access
- Vol. 12, 13020-13036
Open AccessModeling of Motion Distortion Effect of Scanning LiDAR Sensors for Simulation-Based Testing
Automated vehicles use light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors for environmental scanning. However, the relative motion between the scanning LiDAR sensor and objects leads to a distortion of the point cloud. This phenomenon is known as the motion distortion effect, significantly degrading the sensor’s object detection capabilities and generating false negative or false positive errors. In this work, we have introduced ray tracing-based deterministic and analytical approaches to model the motion distortion effect on the scanning LiDAR sensor’s performance for simulation-based testing. In addition, we have performed dynamic test drives at a proving ground to compare real LiDAR data with the motion distortion effect simulation data. The real-world scenarios, the environmental conditions, the digital twin of the scenery, and the object of interest (OOI) are replicated in the virtual environment of commercial software to obtain the synthetic LiDAR data. The real and the virtual test drives are compared frame by frame to validate the motion distortion effect modeling. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), the occupied cell ratio (OCR), and the Barons cross-correlation coefficient (BCC) are used to quantify the correlation between the virtual and the real LiDAR point cloud data. The results show that the deterministic approach matches the real measurements better than the analytical approach for the scenarios in which the yaw rate of the ego vehicle changes rapidly.
- Open Access
Velocity Estimation from LiDAR Sensors Motion Distortion Effect
Many modern automated vehicle sensor systems use light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors. The prevailing technology is scanning LiDAR, where a collimated laser beam illuminates objects sequentially point-by-point to capture 3D range data. In current systems, the point clouds from the LiDAR sensors are mainly used for object detection. To estimate the velocity of an object of interest (OoI) in the point cloud, the tracking of the object or sensor data fusion is needed. Scanning LiDAR sensors show the motion distortion effect, which occurs when objects have a relative velocity to the sensor. Often, this effect is filtered, by using sensor data fusion, to use an undistorted point cloud for object detection. In this study, we developed a method using an artificial neural network to estimate an object’s velocity and direction of motion in the sensor’s field of view (FoV) based on the motion distortion effect without any sensor data fusion. This network was trained and evaluated with a synthetic dataset featuring the motion distortion effect. With the method presented in this paper, one can estimate the velocity and direction of an OoI that moves independently from the sensor from a single point cloud using only one single sensor. The method achieves a root mean squared error (RMSE) of m s−1 and a two-sigma confidence interval of [ m s−1, m s−1] for the axis-wise estimation of an object’s relative velocity, and an RMSE of m s−1 and a two-sigma confidence interval of [ m s−1, m s−1] for the estimation of the resultant velocity. The extracted velocity information (4D-LiDAR) is available for motion prediction and object tracking and can lead to more reliable velocity data due to more redundancy for sensor data fusion.Open AccessVelocity Estimation from LiDAR Sensors Motion Distortion Effect
Many modern automated vehicle sensor systems use light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors. The prevailing technology is scanning LiDAR, where a collimated laser beam illuminates objects sequentially point-by-point to capture 3D range data. In current systems, the point clouds from the LiDAR sensors are mainly used for object detection. To estimate the velocity of an object of interest (OoI) in the point cloud, the tracking of the object or sensor data fusion is needed. Scanning LiDAR sensors show the motion distortion effect, which occurs when objects have a relative velocity to the sensor. Often, this effect is filtered, by using sensor data fusion, to use an undistorted point cloud for object detection. In this study, we developed a method using an artificial neural network to estimate an object’s velocity and direction of motion in the sensor’s field of view (FoV) based on the motion distortion effect without any sensor data fusion. This network was trained and evaluated with a synthetic dataset featuring the motion distortion effect. With the method presented in this paper, one can estimate the velocity and direction of an OoI that moves independently from the sensor from a single point cloud using only one single sensor. The method achieves a root mean squared error (RMSE) of m s−1 and a two-sigma confidence interval of [ m s−1, m s−1] for the axis-wise estimation of an object’s relative velocity, and an RMSE of m s−1 and a two-sigma confidence interval of [ m s−1, m s−1] for the estimation of the resultant velocity. The extracted velocity information (4D-LiDAR) is available for motion prediction and object tracking and can lead to more reliable velocity data due to more redundancy for sensor data fusion. - Top Cited PapersOpen Access
A Methodology to Model the Rain and Fog Effect on the Performance of Automotive LiDAR Sensors
In this work, we introduce a novel approach to model the rain and fog effect on the light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensor performance for the simulation-based testing of LiDAR systems. The proposed methodology allows for the simulation of the rain and fog effect using the rigorous applications of the Mie scattering theory on the time domain for transient and point cloud levels for spatial analyses. The time domain analysis permits us to benchmark the virtual LiDAR signal attenuation and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) caused by rain and fog droplets. In addition, the detection rate (DR), false detection rate (FDR), and distance error of the virtual LiDAR sensor due to rain and fog droplets are evaluated on the point cloud level. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) is used to quantify the simulation and real measurement results on the time domain and point cloud levels for the rain and fog droplets. The results of the simulation and real measurements match well on the time domain and point cloud levels if the simulated and real rain distributions are the same. The real and virtual LiDAR sensor performance degrades more under the influence of fog droplets than in rain.Top Cited PapersOpen AccessA Methodology to Model the Rain and Fog Effect on the Performance of Automotive LiDAR Sensors
In this work, we introduce a novel approach to model the rain and fog effect on the light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensor performance for the simulation-based testing of LiDAR systems. The proposed methodology allows for the simulation of the rain and fog effect using the rigorous applications of the Mie scattering theory on the time domain for transient and point cloud levels for spatial analyses. The time domain analysis permits us to benchmark the virtual LiDAR signal attenuation and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) caused by rain and fog droplets. In addition, the detection rate (DR), false detection rate (FDR), and distance error of the virtual LiDAR sensor due to rain and fog droplets are evaluated on the point cloud level. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) is used to quantify the simulation and real measurement results on the time domain and point cloud levels for the rain and fog droplets. The results of the simulation and real measurements match well on the time domain and point cloud levels if the simulated and real rain distributions are the same. The real and virtual LiDAR sensor performance degrades more under the influence of fog droplets than in rain. - Open Access
Dependence of the Michelson Interferometer-Based Membrane-Less Optical Microphone–Photoacoustic Spectroscopy Gas-Sensing Method on the Fundamental Parameters of a Photoacoustic Gas Cell
This article presents a mathematical model of the Michelson interferometer (MI)-based membrane-less optical microphone (MeoM)–photoacoustic spectroscopy (MeoM–PAS) method, which is also referred to as MI-based photoacoustic interferometry (PAI), for gas-sensing applications in complex and adverse environments, as it offers a completely static measurement system and the separation of a photoacoustic (PA) gas cell from the measuring system. It also investigates the dependence of this method on the fundamental parameters of a cubical PA gas cell using axial PA signals. The results indicate that the phase of the method is a sine function of the distance between the two light beams and a power exponent of the cell length, the cell height, and the distance between the excitation source and the nearest light beam, under the condition that the PA gas cell is resonant and that the excitation source is at the position of the peak or valley of the PA signals. It is at its maximum when the distance between the two light beams is approximately half the wavelength of the PA signals under the same conditions. In addition, the dependence of a PA gas cell using non-axial PA signals is described under the conditions that the PA gas cell is resonant, which is consistent with the changing aforementioned parameters for the distance between the two light beams, the cell length and height, and the distance between the excitation source and the nearest light beam. Furthermore, the selection of five common materials (aluminum, brass, glass, quartz, and stainless steel) for the PA gas cell is discussed under the influence of temperature fluctuations outside the PA gas cell, noise inside and outside the PA gas cell, as well as thermal and viscous losses inside the PA gas cell. The results indicate that quartz and stainless steel are promising options. Finally, the parameters related to the sensitivity enhancement of the method are analyzed using mathematical models, where the sensitivity of the method can be theoretically enhanced by reducing the dimensions of the PA gas cell.
Open AccessDependence of the Michelson Interferometer-Based Membrane-Less Optical Microphone–Photoacoustic Spectroscopy Gas-Sensing Method on the Fundamental Parameters of a Photoacoustic Gas Cell
This article presents a mathematical model of the Michelson interferometer (MI)-based membrane-less optical microphone (MeoM)–photoacoustic spectroscopy (MeoM–PAS) method, which is also referred to as MI-based photoacoustic interferometry (PAI), for gas-sensing applications in complex and adverse environments, as it offers a completely static measurement system and the separation of a photoacoustic (PA) gas cell from the measuring system. It also investigates the dependence of this method on the fundamental parameters of a cubical PA gas cell using axial PA signals. The results indicate that the phase of the method is a sine function of the distance between the two light beams and a power exponent of the cell length, the cell height, and the distance between the excitation source and the nearest light beam, under the condition that the PA gas cell is resonant and that the excitation source is at the position of the peak or valley of the PA signals. It is at its maximum when the distance between the two light beams is approximately half the wavelength of the PA signals under the same conditions. In addition, the dependence of a PA gas cell using non-axial PA signals is described under the conditions that the PA gas cell is resonant, which is consistent with the changing aforementioned parameters for the distance between the two light beams, the cell length and height, and the distance between the excitation source and the nearest light beam. Furthermore, the selection of five common materials (aluminum, brass, glass, quartz, and stainless steel) for the PA gas cell is discussed under the influence of temperature fluctuations outside the PA gas cell, noise inside and outside the PA gas cell, as well as thermal and viscous losses inside the PA gas cell. The results indicate that quartz and stainless steel are promising options. Finally, the parameters related to the sensitivity enhancement of the method are analyzed using mathematical models, where the sensitivity of the method can be theoretically enhanced by reducing the dimensions of the PA gas cell.
- Open Access
Performance Evaluation of MEMS-Based Automotive LiDAR Sensor and Its Simulation Model as per ASTM E3125-17 Standard
Measurement performance evaluation of real and virtual automotive light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors is an active area of research. However, no commonly accepted automotive standards, metrics, or criteria exist to evaluate their measurement performance. ASTM International released the ASTM E3125-17 standard for the operational performance evaluation of 3D imaging systems commonly referred to as terrestrial laser scanners (TLS). This standard defines the specifications and static test procedures to evaluate the 3D imaging and point-to-point distance measurement performance of TLS. In this work, we have assessed the 3D imaging and point-to-point distance estimation performance of a commercial micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS)-based automotive LiDAR sensor and its simulation model according to the test procedures defined in this standard. The static tests were performed in a laboratory environment. In addition, a subset of static tests was also performed at the proving ground in natural environmental conditions to determine the 3D imaging and point-to-point distance measurement performance of the real LiDAR sensor. In addition, real scenarios and environmental conditions were replicated in the virtual environment of a commercial software to verify the LiDAR model’s working performance. The evaluation results show that the LiDAR sensor and its simulation model under analysis pass all the tests specified in the ASTM E3125-17 standard. This standard helps to understand whether sensor measurement errors are due to internal or external influences. We have also shown that the 3D imaging and point-to-point distance estimation performance of LiDAR sensors significantly impacts the working performance of the object recognition algorithm. That is why this standard can be beneficial in validating automotive real and virtual LiDAR sensors, at least in the early stage of development. Furthermore, the simulation and real measurements show good agreement on the point cloud and object recognition levels.
Open AccessPerformance Evaluation of MEMS-Based Automotive LiDAR Sensor and Its Simulation Model as per ASTM E3125-17 Standard
Measurement performance evaluation of real and virtual automotive light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors is an active area of research. However, no commonly accepted automotive standards, metrics, or criteria exist to evaluate their measurement performance. ASTM International released the ASTM E3125-17 standard for the operational performance evaluation of 3D imaging systems commonly referred to as terrestrial laser scanners (TLS). This standard defines the specifications and static test procedures to evaluate the 3D imaging and point-to-point distance measurement performance of TLS. In this work, we have assessed the 3D imaging and point-to-point distance estimation performance of a commercial micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS)-based automotive LiDAR sensor and its simulation model according to the test procedures defined in this standard. The static tests were performed in a laboratory environment. In addition, a subset of static tests was also performed at the proving ground in natural environmental conditions to determine the 3D imaging and point-to-point distance measurement performance of the real LiDAR sensor. In addition, real scenarios and environmental conditions were replicated in the virtual environment of a commercial software to verify the LiDAR model’s working performance. The evaluation results show that the LiDAR sensor and its simulation model under analysis pass all the tests specified in the ASTM E3125-17 standard. This standard helps to understand whether sensor measurement errors are due to internal or external influences. We have also shown that the 3D imaging and point-to-point distance estimation performance of LiDAR sensors significantly impacts the working performance of the object recognition algorithm. That is why this standard can be beneficial in validating automotive real and virtual LiDAR sensors, at least in the early stage of development. Furthermore, the simulation and real measurements show good agreement on the point cloud and object recognition levels.
- 2 February 2023
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in Journal of Lightwave Technology
- Vol. 41 (10) , 3175-3181
Regenerated Fiber Bragg Gratings in Large Mode Area Fibers for High-Temperature Sensing
Regenerated fiber Bragg gratings (RFBGs) have been created in large mode area (LMA) fibers, and their key properties for their application as high-temperature sensors were experimentally characterized. UV written Type-I seed gratings in standard single-mode fibers (SMF-28) and in low numerical aperture LMA fibers with 125 μm and 250 μm cladding diameters were regenerated, and their wavelength drift characteristics at high temperatures, their temperature sensitivities, and their mechanical strengths were tested and compared with each other. We found that low dopant concentrations in the fiber cores led to lower wavelength drift rates during and after regeneration. A temperature calibration from room temperature to 800 $^\circ$ C showed that LMA fibers have generally similar but slightly lower temperature sensitivities than SMF-28 fibers. The tensile strength tests showed that LMA fibers with 250 μm cladding diameter have similar tensile fracture stresses as SMF-28 fibers but four times larger tensile force tolerances because of their twofold fiber diameter. Our research shows that using LMA fibers for RFBGs offers significant advantages for high-temperature sensing than their counterparts in standard fibers, which are also applicable to other silica fiber-based high-temperature sensors.
- 2 February 2023
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in Journal of Lightwave Technology
- Vol. 41 (10) , 3175-3181
Regenerated Fiber Bragg Gratings in Large Mode Area Fibers for High-Temperature Sensing
Regenerated fiber Bragg gratings (RFBGs) have been created in large mode area (LMA) fibers, and their key properties for their application as high-temperature sensors were experimentally characterized. UV written Type-I seed gratings in standard single-mode fibers (SMF-28) and in low numerical aperture LMA fibers with 125 μm and 250 μm cladding diameters were regenerated, and their wavelength drift characteristics at high temperatures, their temperature sensitivities, and their mechanical strengths were tested and compared with each other. We found that low dopant concentrations in the fiber cores led to lower wavelength drift rates during and after regeneration. A temperature calibration from room temperature to 800 $^\circ$ C showed that LMA fibers have generally similar but slightly lower temperature sensitivities than SMF-28 fibers. The tensile strength tests showed that LMA fibers with 250 μm cladding diameter have similar tensile fracture stresses as SMF-28 fibers but four times larger tensile force tolerances because of their twofold fiber diameter. Our research shows that using LMA fibers for RFBGs offers significant advantages for high-temperature sensing than their counterparts in standard fibers, which are also applicable to other silica fiber-based high-temperature sensors.
- Open Access
- 19 December 2022
- Published by IOP Publishing in Applied Physics Express
- Vol. 16 (1) , 012003
Core diameter and numerical aperture dependences on the performance of fiber-optic multimode interference sensing
Modal interference in a multimode fiber (MMF) has been utilized to develop simple sensors for various physical parameters. Herein, first, we investigate the dependences of the core diameter and the numerical aperture (NA) of the MMF on the performance of multimode-interference-based strain and temperature sensing. We find that a larger core diameter leads to higher temperature sensitivity but lower strain sensitivity (absolute value) and that higher NA does not influence the temperature sensitivity but results in higher strain sensitivity (absolute value). Subsequently, using the obtained low strain sensitivity, we demonstrate strain-insensitive temperature sensing with a sensitivity of approximately 6.1 pm °C−1.
- 19 December 2022
- Published by IOP Publishing in Applied Physics Express
- Vol. 16 (1) , 012003
Open AccessCore diameter and numerical aperture dependences on the performance of fiber-optic multimode interference sensing
Modal interference in a multimode fiber (MMF) has been utilized to develop simple sensors for various physical parameters. Herein, first, we investigate the dependences of the core diameter and the numerical aperture (NA) of the MMF on the performance of multimode-interference-based strain and temperature sensing. We find that a larger core diameter leads to higher temperature sensitivity but lower strain sensitivity (absolute value) and that higher NA does not influence the temperature sensitivity but results in higher strain sensitivity (absolute value). Subsequently, using the obtained low strain sensitivity, we demonstrate strain-insensitive temperature sensing with a sensitivity of approximately 6.1 pm °C−1.
- Open Access
Development of High-Fidelity Automotive LiDAR Sensor Model with Standardized Interfaces
This work introduces a process to develop a tool-independent, high-fidelity, ray tracing-based light detection and ranging (LiDAR) model. This virtual LiDAR sensor includes accurate modeling of the scan pattern and a complete signal processing toolchain of a LiDAR sensor. It is developed as a functional mock-up unit (FMU) by using the standardized open simulation interface (OSI) 3.0.2, and functional mock-up interface (FMI) 2.0. Subsequently, it was integrated into two commercial software virtual environment frameworks to demonstrate its exchangeability. Furthermore, the accuracy of the LiDAR sensor model is validated by comparing the simulation and real measurement data on the time domain and on the point cloud level. The validation results show that the mean absolute percentage error of simulated and measured time domain signal amplitude is . In addition, the of the number of points and mean intensity values received from the virtual and real targets are and , respectively. To the author’s knowledge, these are the smallest errors reported for the number of received points and mean intensity values up until now. Moreover, the distance error is below the range accuracy of the actual LiDAR sensor, which is 2 cm for this use case. In addition, the proving ground measurement results are compared with the state-of-the-art LiDAR model provided by commercial software and the proposed LiDAR model to measure the presented model fidelity. The results show that the complete signal processing steps and imperfections of real LiDAR sensors need to be considered in the virtual LiDAR to obtain simulation results close to the actual sensor. Such considerable imperfections are optical losses, inherent detector effects, effects generated by the electrical amplification, and noise produced by the sunlight.Open AccessDevelopment of High-Fidelity Automotive LiDAR Sensor Model with Standardized Interfaces
This work introduces a process to develop a tool-independent, high-fidelity, ray tracing-based light detection and ranging (LiDAR) model. This virtual LiDAR sensor includes accurate modeling of the scan pattern and a complete signal processing toolchain of a LiDAR sensor. It is developed as a functional mock-up unit (FMU) by using the standardized open simulation interface (OSI) 3.0.2, and functional mock-up interface (FMI) 2.0. Subsequently, it was integrated into two commercial software virtual environment frameworks to demonstrate its exchangeability. Furthermore, the accuracy of the LiDAR sensor model is validated by comparing the simulation and real measurement data on the time domain and on the point cloud level. The validation results show that the mean absolute percentage error of simulated and measured time domain signal amplitude is . In addition, the of the number of points and mean intensity values received from the virtual and real targets are and , respectively. To the author’s knowledge, these are the smallest errors reported for the number of received points and mean intensity values up until now. Moreover, the distance error is below the range accuracy of the actual LiDAR sensor, which is 2 cm for this use case. In addition, the proving ground measurement results are compared with the state-of-the-art LiDAR model provided by commercial software and the proposed LiDAR model to measure the presented model fidelity. The results show that the complete signal processing steps and imperfections of real LiDAR sensors need to be considered in the virtual LiDAR to obtain simulation results close to the actual sensor. Such considerable imperfections are optical losses, inherent detector effects, effects generated by the electrical amplification, and noise produced by the sunlight. - Open Access
MEMS-Scanner Testbench for High Field of View LiDAR Applications
LiDAR sensors are a key technology for enabling safe autonomous cars. For highway applications, such systems must have a long range, and the covered field of view (FoV) of >45° must be scanned with resolutions higher than 0.1°. These specifications can be met by modern MEMS scanners, which are chosen for their robustness and scalability. For the automotive market, these sensors, and especially the scanners within, must be tested to the highest standards. We propose a novel measurement setup for characterizing and validating these kinds of scanners based on a position-sensitive detector (PSD) by imaging a deflected laser beam from a diffuser screen onto the PSD. A so-called ray trace shifting technique (RTST) was used to minimize manual calibration effort, to reduce external mounting errors, and to enable dynamical one-shot measurements of the scanner’s steering angle over large FoVs. This paper describes the overall setup and the calibration method according to a standard camera calibration. We further show the setup’s capabilities by validating it with a statically set rotating stage and a dynamically oscillating MEMS scanner. The setup was found to be capable of measuring LiDAR MEMS scanners with a maximum FoV of 47° dynamically, with an uncertainty of less than 1%.
Open AccessMEMS-Scanner Testbench for High Field of View LiDAR Applications
LiDAR sensors are a key technology for enabling safe autonomous cars. For highway applications, such systems must have a long range, and the covered field of view (FoV) of >45° must be scanned with resolutions higher than 0.1°. These specifications can be met by modern MEMS scanners, which are chosen for their robustness and scalability. For the automotive market, these sensors, and especially the scanners within, must be tested to the highest standards. We propose a novel measurement setup for characterizing and validating these kinds of scanners based on a position-sensitive detector (PSD) by imaging a deflected laser beam from a diffuser screen onto the PSD. A so-called ray trace shifting technique (RTST) was used to minimize manual calibration effort, to reduce external mounting errors, and to enable dynamical one-shot measurements of the scanner’s steering angle over large FoVs. This paper describes the overall setup and the calibration method according to a standard camera calibration. We further show the setup’s capabilities by validating it with a statically set rotating stage and a dynamically oscillating MEMS scanner. The setup was found to be capable of measuring LiDAR MEMS scanners with a maximum FoV of 47° dynamically, with an uncertainty of less than 1%.