Robert W. Adelman
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Robert W. Adelman has a total of 3 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
David R. Kraus
Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16802, USA
1 shared publicationLouis G. Castonguay
Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16802, USA
1 shared publicationSanno E. Zack
Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16802, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 14 August 2014
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Psychotherapy Research
- Vol. 25 (1) , 108-120
Conducting research and collaborating with researchers: The experience of clinicians in a residential treatment center
This paper describes the experience of clinicians in conducting research and collaborating with academic researchers. As part of clinical routine of a residential program for adolescent substance abusers, empirical data have been collected to assess client's needs before and after treatment, improve clinical practice, and identify barriers to change. Some of the challenges faced and the benefits learned in conducting these studies are presented. In addition to highlighting the convergence of research interests between clinicians and academicians, the conclusion offers general recommendations to foster these partnerships and solidify the scientific-practitioner model.
- 14 August 2014
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Psychotherapy Research
- Vol. 25 (1) , 108-120
Conducting research and collaborating with researchers: The experience of clinicians in a residential treatment center
This paper describes the experience of clinicians in conducting research and collaborating with academic researchers. As part of clinical routine of a residential program for adolescent substance abusers, empirical data have been collected to assess client's needs before and after treatment, improve clinical practice, and identify barriers to change. Some of the challenges faced and the benefits learned in conducting these studies are presented. In addition to highlighting the convergence of research interests between clinicians and academicians, the conclusion offers general recommendations to foster these partnerships and solidify the scientific-practitioner model.