Saber Alidadi
Research Interests
Saber Alidadi has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alireza Mohammadi
Generation and Transfer Planning Office, Operation Deputy, South East Company of Operation, Generation, and Transfer Water, Ahvaz 63461-15386, Iran
1 shared publication - Ebrahim Hajidavalloo
Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz
1 shared publication - Masoud Hakami
Khuzestan Water and Power Authority
1 shared publication - Mohammadreza Mohammadi
School of Science, Engineering, and Design, Teesside University, Middlesbrough TS1 3BX, UK
1 shared publication - Moona Mohammadi
Operation and Maintenance Department, Water Supply Deputy, Khuzestan Water and Power Authority (KWPA), Ahvaz 61335-137, Iran
1 shared publication - Morteza Behbahani-Nejad
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Francis Turbine Draft Tube Troubleshooting during Operational Conditions Using CFD Analysis
Hydropower plant vibrations due to pressure fluctuations and their troubleshooting methods are some of the most challenging issues in power plant operation and maintenance. This paper targets these fluctuations in a prototype turbine in two geometries: the initially approved design and the as-built design. Due to topographic conditions downstream, these geometries slightly differ in the draft tube height; the potential effect of such a slight geometrical change on the applicability of troubleshooting techniques is investigated. Therefore, the water flow was simulated using the CFD scheme at three operating points based on the SST k–ω turbulence model, while the injection of water/air was examined to decrease the pressure fluctuations in the draft tube, and the outputs were compared with no-injection simulations. The results show that a slight change in draft tube geometry causes the pressure fluctuations to increase 1.2 to 2.8 times after 4 s injecting at different operating points. The modification in the location of the air injection also could not reduce the increase in pressure fluctuations and caused a 3.6-fold increase in pressure fluctuations. Therefore, the results show that despite water/air injection being a common technique in the hydropower industry to reduce pressure fluctuations, it is effective only in the initially approved design geometry. At the same time, it has a reverse effect on the as-built geometry and increases the pressure fluctuations. This research highlights the importance of binding the construction phase with the design and troubleshooting stages and how slight changes in construction can affect operational issues.
Open AccessFrancis Turbine Draft Tube Troubleshooting during Operational Conditions Using CFD Analysis
Hydropower plant vibrations due to pressure fluctuations and their troubleshooting methods are some of the most challenging issues in power plant operation and maintenance. This paper targets these fluctuations in a prototype turbine in two geometries: the initially approved design and the as-built design. Due to topographic conditions downstream, these geometries slightly differ in the draft tube height; the potential effect of such a slight geometrical change on the applicability of troubleshooting techniques is investigated. Therefore, the water flow was simulated using the CFD scheme at three operating points based on the SST k–ω turbulence model, while the injection of water/air was examined to decrease the pressure fluctuations in the draft tube, and the outputs were compared with no-injection simulations. The results show that a slight change in draft tube geometry causes the pressure fluctuations to increase 1.2 to 2.8 times after 4 s injecting at different operating points. The modification in the location of the air injection also could not reduce the increase in pressure fluctuations and caused a 3.6-fold increase in pressure fluctuations. Therefore, the results show that despite water/air injection being a common technique in the hydropower industry to reduce pressure fluctuations, it is effective only in the initially approved design geometry. At the same time, it has a reverse effect on the as-built geometry and increases the pressure fluctuations. This research highlights the importance of binding the construction phase with the design and troubleshooting stages and how slight changes in construction can affect operational issues.
- 19 September 2014
- Published by Springer Nature in Geotechnical and Geological Engineering
- Vol. 33 (1) , 137-142
Rehabilitation of Temporary Composite Dams (Case Study: Mared Soil-Sheet Pile Dam)
- 19 September 2014
- Published by Springer Nature in Geotechnical and Geological Engineering
- Vol. 33 (1) , 137-142
Rehabilitation of Temporary Composite Dams (Case Study: Mared Soil-Sheet Pile Dam)