BEBruno Enekvist

Bruno Enekvist

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Bruno Enekvist has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Pulse perfusion value predicts eye opening after sevoflurane anaesthesia: an explorative study

    by Bruno Enekvist, Anders Johansson

    The variables measured in modern pulse oximetry apparatuses include a graphical pulse curve and a specified perfusion value (PV) that could be a sensitive marker for detecting differences in sympathetic activity. We hypothesized that there is a correlation between a reduction of PV and the time to eye opening after general anaesthesia. The objective was to investigate whether PV can predict eye opening after sevoflurane anaesthesia. Prospective, explorative clinical study included 20 patients, ASA physical status 1 or 2, at Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden, from November 2012 to January 2013 scheduled for elective breast tumour surgery. A general anaesthesia was delivered with inhalation of oxygen, nitrous oxide and sevoflurane anaesthesia to a depth of 1.2 minimal alveolar concentration. Sevoflurane inspiratory and expiratory concentrations were measured. Bispectral index monitoring, PV as measured by pulse oximeter, heart rate and carbon dioxide were registered at before anaesthesia, 15 min after induction (at 1.2 minimal alveolar concentration), at end of surgery and at eye opening at the end of anaesthesia. PV values were lower before anaesthesia and at eye opening compared to at 15 min after induction and at end of surgery (P < 0.05). The reduction of PV between end of surgery and eye opening was 0.76. We conclude that the pulse oximeter PV could be a useful variable to assess the timing of recovery, in terms of eye opening after a general anaesthesia.


    • 1 April 2014
      • Vol. 82  (2) , 114-20

    Ventilation with increased apparatus dead space vs positive end-expiratory pressure: effects on gas exchange and circulation during anesthesia in a randomized clinical study.

    by Bruno Enekvist, Mikael Bodelsson, Michelle Chew, Anders Johansson

    Atelectasis formation can be reduced by positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), but resulting increases in intrathoracic pressure could affect circulation. We have earlier demonstrated that increased tidal volumes with larger apparatus dead space improves oxygenation and sevoflurane uptake. In the present study, we hypothesize that isocapnic ventilation with increased tidal volumes increases oxygen and sevoflurane uptake similar to ventilation with PEEP, but with less impact on cardiac output. Thirty patients, with ASA physical status 1 or 2, scheduled for elective open colon surgery were randomly assigned to be ventilated with either PEEP at 10 cm H20 (PEEP, 15 patients) or increased tidal volumes achieved with larger apparatus dead space but with zero end-expiratory pressure (DS group, 15 patients). Oxygen tension and arterial sevoflurane concentration were significantly higher in the DS group (P < .05). Cardiac output decreased significantly less in the DS group compared with the PEEP group (5% and 33%, respectively; P < .05). Consequently, isocapnic ventilation with increased tidal volumes using apparatus dead space increased oxygen and sevoflurane tensions in arterial blood and preserved cardiac output better than did PEEP.