Hiroaki Kuroda
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Hiroaki Kuroda has a total of 155 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Yukinori Sakao
Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo 173-8605, Japan
21 shared publications Noriaki Sakakura
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
15 shared publications- Noriaki Sakakura
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya 464-8681, Japan
15 shared publications - Yusuke Takahashi
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
9 shared publications Yusuke Sugita
Aichi Canc Ctr Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
8 shared publications- Takeo Nakada
Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
7 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 24 December 2024
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 67 (1)
The impact of restricted chests on long-term lung function parameters following lung transplantation in patients with interstitial lung disease
OBJECTIVES: In patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), the diaphragm typically rises as the lungs chronically shrink. However, the grade of restriction differs in each patient. It is currently unknown, how disparities between actual and predicted recipient total lung capacity (TLC), impact changes in lung function parameters and long-term outcomes following lung transplantation (LTx). METHODS: This retrospective study included 170 LTx for the patients with ILD performed in a European high-volume LTx center between 09/2011 and 12/2022. The preoperative median ratio of recipient actual to predicted (a/p) TLC was 0.55. Patients were stratified into two groups: low a/p TLC ratio group, corresponding to a more restricted chest cavity (<0.55: n = 85), and high a/p TLC ratio group, corresponding to a more preserved chest cavity (≥0.55: n = 85). Perioperative and long-term outcomes, including lung function and overall survival, were analysed. RESULTS: Between the two groups, tracheostomy and reintubation rates, length of mechanical ventilation, ICU-stay and hospital-stay were not significantly different. Although lung function measurements obtained early after LTx were better in the high a/p TLC ratio group, no significant differences were observed in the long term. Five-year overall survival was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although LTx for ILD patients with a restricted chest is considered technically more challenging, the perioperative course is similar to ILD patients with a preserved chest. In addition, no significant differences were observed between both groups in long-term lung function and overall survival, suggesting an improvement in chest wall compliance.
- 24 December 2024
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 67 (1)
The impact of restricted chests on long-term lung function parameters following lung transplantation in patients with interstitial lung disease
OBJECTIVES: In patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), the diaphragm typically rises as the lungs chronically shrink. However, the grade of restriction differs in each patient. It is currently unknown, how disparities between actual and predicted recipient total lung capacity (TLC), impact changes in lung function parameters and long-term outcomes following lung transplantation (LTx). METHODS: This retrospective study included 170 LTx for the patients with ILD performed in a European high-volume LTx center between 09/2011 and 12/2022. The preoperative median ratio of recipient actual to predicted (a/p) TLC was 0.55. Patients were stratified into two groups: low a/p TLC ratio group, corresponding to a more restricted chest cavity (<0.55: n = 85), and high a/p TLC ratio group, corresponding to a more preserved chest cavity (≥0.55: n = 85). Perioperative and long-term outcomes, including lung function and overall survival, were analysed. RESULTS: Between the two groups, tracheostomy and reintubation rates, length of mechanical ventilation, ICU-stay and hospital-stay were not significantly different. Although lung function measurements obtained early after LTx were better in the high a/p TLC ratio group, no significant differences were observed in the long term. Five-year overall survival was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although LTx for ILD patients with a restricted chest is considered technically more challenging, the perioperative course is similar to ILD patients with a preserved chest. In addition, no significant differences were observed between both groups in long-term lung function and overall survival, suggesting an improvement in chest wall compliance.
- Open Access
Survival after Lung Metastasectomy from Esophageal Cancer: Results from a Multi-Institutional Database
To clarify the clinical impact and to identify prognostic predictors of surgical intervention for pulmonary metastasis from esophageal cancer, a registry database analysis was performed. From January 2000 to March 2020, patients who underwent resection of pulmonary metastases from primary esophageal cancer at 18 institutions were registered in a database developed by the Metastatic Lung Tumor Study Group of Japan. An amount of 109 cases were reviewed and examined for the prognostic factors for pulmonary metastasectomy of metastases from esophageal cancer. As a result, five-year overall survival after pulmonary metastasectomy was 34.4% and five-year disease-free survival was 22.1%. The multivariate analysis for overall survival revealed that initial recurrence site, maximum tumor size, and duration from primary tumor treatment to lung surgery were selected as the significant prognostic factors (p = 0.043, p = 0.048, and p = 0.037, respectively). In addition, from the results of the multivariate analysis for disease free survival, number of lung metastases, initial recurrence site, duration from primary tumor treatment to lung surgery, and preoperative chemotherapy for lung metastasis were selected as the significant prognostic factors (p = 0.037, p = 0.008, p = 0.010, and p = 0.020, respectively). In conclusion, eligible patients with pulmonary metastasis from esophageal cancer selected based on the identified prognostic predictors would be good candidates for pulmonary metastasectomy.
Open AccessSurvival after Lung Metastasectomy from Esophageal Cancer: Results from a Multi-Institutional Database
To clarify the clinical impact and to identify prognostic predictors of surgical intervention for pulmonary metastasis from esophageal cancer, a registry database analysis was performed. From January 2000 to March 2020, patients who underwent resection of pulmonary metastases from primary esophageal cancer at 18 institutions were registered in a database developed by the Metastatic Lung Tumor Study Group of Japan. An amount of 109 cases were reviewed and examined for the prognostic factors for pulmonary metastasectomy of metastases from esophageal cancer. As a result, five-year overall survival after pulmonary metastasectomy was 34.4% and five-year disease-free survival was 22.1%. The multivariate analysis for overall survival revealed that initial recurrence site, maximum tumor size, and duration from primary tumor treatment to lung surgery were selected as the significant prognostic factors (p = 0.043, p = 0.048, and p = 0.037, respectively). In addition, from the results of the multivariate analysis for disease free survival, number of lung metastases, initial recurrence site, duration from primary tumor treatment to lung surgery, and preoperative chemotherapy for lung metastasis were selected as the significant prognostic factors (p = 0.037, p = 0.008, p = 0.010, and p = 0.020, respectively). In conclusion, eligible patients with pulmonary metastasis from esophageal cancer selected based on the identified prognostic predictors would be good candidates for pulmonary metastasectomy.
- Open Access
- 1 February 2023
- Published by AME Publishing Company in Journal of Thoracic Disease
- Vol. 15 (2) , 747-758
The beginning of a new era in induction treatment for operable non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review
Review Article The beginning of a new era in induction treatment for operable non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review Shuichi Shinohara, Yusuke Takahashi, Katsuhiro Masago, Hirokazu Matsushita, Hiroaki Kuroda
- 1 February 2023
- Published by AME Publishing Company in Journal of Thoracic Disease
- Vol. 15 (2) , 747-758
Open AccessThe beginning of a new era in induction treatment for operable non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review
Review Article The beginning of a new era in induction treatment for operable non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review Shuichi Shinohara, Yusuke Takahashi, Katsuhiro Masago, Hirokazu Matsushita, Hiroaki Kuroda
- Open Access
- 27 October 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Personalized Medicine
- Vol. 12 (11) , 1771
Three-Arm Robotic Lung Resection via the Open-Thoracotomy-View Approach Using Vertical Port Placement and Confronting Monitor Setting: Focusing on Segmentectomy
To perform robotic lung resections with views similar to those in thoracotomy, we devised a vertical port placement and confronting upside-down monitor setting: the three-arm, robotic “open-thoracotomy-view approach (OTVA)”. We described the robotic OTVA experiences focusing on segmentectomy and its technical aspects. We retrospectively reviewed 114 consecutive patients who underwent robotic lung resections (76 lobectomies and 38 segmentectomies) with OTVA using the da Vinci Xi Surgical System between February 2019 and June 2022. To identify segmental boundaries, we administered indocyanine green intravenously and used the robotic fluorescence imaging system (Firefly). In all procedures, cranial-side intrathoracic structures, which are often hidden in the conventional look-up-view method, were well visualized. The mean durations of surgery and console operation were 195 and 140 min, respectively, and 225 and 173 min, for segmentectomy and lobectomy, respectively. In segmentectomy, console operation was significantly shorter (approximately 30 min, p < 0.001) and two more staplers (8.2 ± 2.3) were used compared with lobectomy (6.6 ± 2.6, p = 0.003). In both groups, median postoperative durations of chest tube placement and hospitalization were 0 and 3 days, respectively. This three-arm robotic OTVA setting offers natural thoracotomy views and can be an alternative for segmentectomy and lobectomy.
- 27 October 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Personalized Medicine
- Vol. 12 (11) , 1771
Open AccessThree-Arm Robotic Lung Resection via the Open-Thoracotomy-View Approach Using Vertical Port Placement and Confronting Monitor Setting: Focusing on Segmentectomy
To perform robotic lung resections with views similar to those in thoracotomy, we devised a vertical port placement and confronting upside-down monitor setting: the three-arm, robotic “open-thoracotomy-view approach (OTVA)”. We described the robotic OTVA experiences focusing on segmentectomy and its technical aspects. We retrospectively reviewed 114 consecutive patients who underwent robotic lung resections (76 lobectomies and 38 segmentectomies) with OTVA using the da Vinci Xi Surgical System between February 2019 and June 2022. To identify segmental boundaries, we administered indocyanine green intravenously and used the robotic fluorescence imaging system (Firefly). In all procedures, cranial-side intrathoracic structures, which are often hidden in the conventional look-up-view method, were well visualized. The mean durations of surgery and console operation were 195 and 140 min, respectively, and 225 and 173 min, for segmentectomy and lobectomy, respectively. In segmentectomy, console operation was significantly shorter (approximately 30 min, p < 0.001) and two more staplers (8.2 ± 2.3) were used compared with lobectomy (6.6 ± 2.6, p = 0.003). In both groups, median postoperative durations of chest tube placement and hospitalization were 0 and 3 days, respectively. This three-arm robotic OTVA setting offers natural thoracotomy views and can be an alternative for segmentectomy and lobectomy.
- Open Access
- 26 October 2022
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Cancer Management and Research
- Vol. ume 14, 3095-3103
Survival Outcomes of Complete Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas
Purpose: Metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is relatively poor; however, depending on the selected cases, pulmonary metastasectomy can be a practical therapeutic option. This study aimed to identify the outcomes of complete metastasectomy based on each primary site and to investigate unfavorable prognostic factors. Patients and Methods: We used the database from the Metastatic Lung Tumour Study Group of Japan. Between November 1980 and April 2017, 231 patients were deemed eligible. According to anatomy and the current epidemiology of HNSCC, the patients were divided into three groups: nasopharynx, oropharynx, and salivary gland (n = 40, Group 1), oral cavity, tongue, and paranasal sinuses (n = 69, Group 2), and larynx and hypopharynx (n = 122, Group 3). Results: The 5-year overall survival after complete pulmonary metastasectomy was 58.5%, 25.0%, and 46.9% in G1, 2, and 3, respectively (p < 0.01). Multivariate analyses revealed unfavourable prognostic factors to be G2, and pathological maximum diameter was > 20 mm. Therefore, on dividing group 1 and 3 with or without diameter, the 5-year overall survival was significantly worse in HNSCC with a diameter > 20 mm (n = 74) than that in the remnant (n = 88; 61.9% vs 35.5%; p < 0.01). Conclusion: According to the multi-institutional Japanese data, pulmonary metastasectomy from HNSCC indicates a potential survival benefit. Oral cavity, tongue, and paranasal sinuses cancer, and tumour size (> 20 mm) were poor prognostic factors for pulmonary metastasectomy from head and neck cancer.
- 26 October 2022
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Cancer Management and Research
- Vol. ume 14, 3095-3103
Open AccessSurvival Outcomes of Complete Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas
Purpose: Metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is relatively poor; however, depending on the selected cases, pulmonary metastasectomy can be a practical therapeutic option. This study aimed to identify the outcomes of complete metastasectomy based on each primary site and to investigate unfavorable prognostic factors. Patients and Methods: We used the database from the Metastatic Lung Tumour Study Group of Japan. Between November 1980 and April 2017, 231 patients were deemed eligible. According to anatomy and the current epidemiology of HNSCC, the patients were divided into three groups: nasopharynx, oropharynx, and salivary gland (n = 40, Group 1), oral cavity, tongue, and paranasal sinuses (n = 69, Group 2), and larynx and hypopharynx (n = 122, Group 3). Results: The 5-year overall survival after complete pulmonary metastasectomy was 58.5%, 25.0%, and 46.9% in G1, 2, and 3, respectively (p < 0.01). Multivariate analyses revealed unfavourable prognostic factors to be G2, and pathological maximum diameter was > 20 mm. Therefore, on dividing group 1 and 3 with or without diameter, the 5-year overall survival was significantly worse in HNSCC with a diameter > 20 mm (n = 74) than that in the remnant (n = 88; 61.9% vs 35.5%; p < 0.01). Conclusion: According to the multi-institutional Japanese data, pulmonary metastasectomy from HNSCC indicates a potential survival benefit. Oral cavity, tongue, and paranasal sinuses cancer, and tumour size (> 20 mm) were poor prognostic factors for pulmonary metastasectomy from head and neck cancer.
- 17 September 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Cancer Genetics
- Vol. 268-269, 64-74
Association of the KRAS genotype and clinicopathologic findings of resected non‐small‐cell lung cancer: A pooled analysis of 179 patients
- 17 September 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Cancer Genetics
- Vol. 268-269, 64-74
Association of the KRAS genotype and clinicopathologic findings of resected non‐small‐cell lung cancer: A pooled analysis of 179 patients
- Open Access
Comparison between Fluorimetry (Qubit) and Spectrophotometry (NanoDrop) in the Quantification of DNA and RNA Extracted from Frozen and FFPE Tissues from Lung Cancer Patients: A Real-World Use of Genomic Tests
Background and Objectives: Panel-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been carried out in daily clinical settings for the diagnosis and treatment guidance of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The success of genomic tests including NGS depends in large part on preparing better-quality DNA or RNA; however, there are no established operating methods for preparing genomic DNA and RNA samples. Materials and Methods: We compared the following two quantitative methods, the QubitTM and NanoDropTM, using 585 surgical specimens, 278 biopsy specimens, and 82 cell block specimens of lung cancer that were used for genetic tests, including NGS. We analyzed the success rate of the genomic tests, including NGS, which were performed with DNA and RNA with concentrations that were outliers for the Qubit Fluorometer. Results: The absolute value for DNA concentrations had a tendency to be higher when measured with NanoDropTM regardless of the type of specimen; however, this was not the case for RNA. The success rate of DNA-based genomic tests using specimens with a concentration below the lower limit of QubitTM detection was as high as approximately 96%. At less than 60%, the success rate of RNA-based genomic tests, including RT-PCR, was not as satisfactory. The success rates of the AmpliSeqTM DNA panel sequencing and RNA panel sequencing were 77.8% and 91.5%, respectively. If at least one PCR amplification product could be obtained, then all RNA-based sequencing was performed successfully. Conclusions: The concentration measurements with NanoDropTM are reliable. The success rate of NGS with samples at concentrations below the limit of detection of QubitTM was relatively higher than expected, and it is worth performing PCR-based panel sequencing, especially in cases where re-biopsy cannot be performed.
Open AccessComparison between Fluorimetry (Qubit) and Spectrophotometry (NanoDrop) in the Quantification of DNA and RNA Extracted from Frozen and FFPE Tissues from Lung Cancer Patients: A Real-World Use of Genomic Tests
Background and Objectives: Panel-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been carried out in daily clinical settings for the diagnosis and treatment guidance of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The success of genomic tests including NGS depends in large part on preparing better-quality DNA or RNA; however, there are no established operating methods for preparing genomic DNA and RNA samples. Materials and Methods: We compared the following two quantitative methods, the QubitTM and NanoDropTM, using 585 surgical specimens, 278 biopsy specimens, and 82 cell block specimens of lung cancer that were used for genetic tests, including NGS. We analyzed the success rate of the genomic tests, including NGS, which were performed with DNA and RNA with concentrations that were outliers for the Qubit Fluorometer. Results: The absolute value for DNA concentrations had a tendency to be higher when measured with NanoDropTM regardless of the type of specimen; however, this was not the case for RNA. The success rate of DNA-based genomic tests using specimens with a concentration below the lower limit of QubitTM detection was as high as approximately 96%. At less than 60%, the success rate of RNA-based genomic tests, including RT-PCR, was not as satisfactory. The success rates of the AmpliSeqTM DNA panel sequencing and RNA panel sequencing were 77.8% and 91.5%, respectively. If at least one PCR amplification product could be obtained, then all RNA-based sequencing was performed successfully. Conclusions: The concentration measurements with NanoDropTM are reliable. The success rate of NGS with samples at concentrations below the limit of detection of QubitTM was relatively higher than expected, and it is worth performing PCR-based panel sequencing, especially in cases where re-biopsy cannot be performed.
- Open Access
Permissible Outcomes of Lobe-Specific Lymph Node Dissection for Elevated Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Background and Objectives: Lobe-specific nodal dissection (L-SND) is currently acceptable for the dissection of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but not for cancers of more advanced clinical stages. We aimed to assess the efficacy of L-SND, compared to systemic nodal dissection (SND). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of patients with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) abnormality who underwent complete resection of NSCLC via lobectomy or more in addition to either SND or L-SND at two cancer-specific institutions from January 2006 to December 2017. Results: A total of 799 patients, including 265 patients who underwent SND and 534 patients who underwent L-SND, were included. On multivariate analysis, thoracotomy, more than lobectomy, cN1-2, advanced pathological stage, adjuvant treatment, and EGFR or ALK were strongly associated with SND. No significant differences were found in overall survival, disease-free survival, and overtime survival after propensity adjustment (p = 0.09, p = 0.11, and p = 0.50, respectively). There were no significant differences in local (p = 0.16), regional (p = 0.72), or distant (p = 0.39) tumor recurrence between the two groups. Conclusions: SND did not improve the prognosis of NSCLC patients with CEA abnormality. Complete pulmonary resection via L-SND seems useful for NSCLC patients with CEA abnormality.
Open AccessPermissible Outcomes of Lobe-Specific Lymph Node Dissection for Elevated Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Background and Objectives: Lobe-specific nodal dissection (L-SND) is currently acceptable for the dissection of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but not for cancers of more advanced clinical stages. We aimed to assess the efficacy of L-SND, compared to systemic nodal dissection (SND). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of patients with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) abnormality who underwent complete resection of NSCLC via lobectomy or more in addition to either SND or L-SND at two cancer-specific institutions from January 2006 to December 2017. Results: A total of 799 patients, including 265 patients who underwent SND and 534 patients who underwent L-SND, were included. On multivariate analysis, thoracotomy, more than lobectomy, cN1-2, advanced pathological stage, adjuvant treatment, and EGFR or ALK were strongly associated with SND. No significant differences were found in overall survival, disease-free survival, and overtime survival after propensity adjustment (p = 0.09, p = 0.11, and p = 0.50, respectively). There were no significant differences in local (p = 0.16), regional (p = 0.72), or distant (p = 0.39) tumor recurrence between the two groups. Conclusions: SND did not improve the prognosis of NSCLC patients with CEA abnormality. Complete pulmonary resection via L-SND seems useful for NSCLC patients with CEA abnormality.
- Open Access
- 1 December 2021
- Published by AME Publishing Company in Translational Lung Cancer Research
- Vol. 10 (11) , 4310-4312
Surgical perception of lower tracheal or carinal resection
Surgical perception of lower tracheal or carinal resection Yusuke Sugita, Hiroaki Kuroda, Katsuhiro Masago
- 1 December 2021
- Published by AME Publishing Company in Translational Lung Cancer Research
- Vol. 10 (11) , 4310-4312
Open AccessSurgical perception of lower tracheal or carinal resection
Surgical perception of lower tracheal or carinal resection Yusuke Sugita, Hiroaki Kuroda, Katsuhiro Masago
- Open Access
- 1 December 2021
- Published by AME Publishing Company in AME Medical Journal
- Vol. 6, 35
Research advance in tumor specific antigens: a narrative review
Research advance in tumor specific antigens: a narrative review Yusuke Takahashi, Ayako Demachi-Okamura, Yuko Oya, Takeo Nakada, Noriaki Sakakura, Hiroaki Kuroda, Hirokazu Matsushita
- 1 December 2021
- Published by AME Publishing Company in AME Medical Journal
- Vol. 6, 35
Open AccessResearch advance in tumor specific antigens: a narrative review
Research advance in tumor specific antigens: a narrative review Yusuke Takahashi, Ayako Demachi-Okamura, Yuko Oya, Takeo Nakada, Noriaki Sakakura, Hiroaki Kuroda, Hirokazu Matsushita