Mercedes A. Bravo
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Mercedes A. Bravo has a total of 138 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Michelle Lee Bell
Yale University
13 shared publications Marie Lynn Miranda
Children’s Environmental Health Initiative, University of Illinois Chicago , Chicago, IL
11 shared publicationsDominique Zephyr
Children’s Environmental Health Initiative, University of Illinois Chicago , Chicago, IL
6 shared publications- Fang Fang
Genomics and Applied Public Health Center, RTI International, Durham, United States of America
3 shared publications Ji-Young Son
School of the Environment, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA
3 shared publications- Melissa R. Fiffer
Children's Environmental Health Initiative, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 9 March 2026
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 195 (6) , 1526-1536
Beyond Black and White: relationships between segregation, environmental burden, and birth outcomes among Black and Latino populations
Segregation measures over time likely mask the movement of Latinos into predominantly non-Hispanic Black (NHB) areas. Due to systematic disinvestment, the co-location of NHB and Latinos may correlate with environmental and social stressors. We construct a combined racial isolation (RI) measure for Blacks and Latinos for the 72 246 contiguous U.S. census tracts. We compare trends (1990-2015) in RI of NHB individuals and RI of NHB and Hispanic individuals (RI-NHB + H). We estimate correlations between RI-NHB + H and CDC Environmental Justice Index (EJI) components. We assess associations between EJI, RI-NHB + H, and birthweight percentiles using North Carolina detailed birth records (n = 504 363; 2015-2019). Between 1990-2015, RI-NHB + H and RI-NHB increased in most (88.7%) and the majority (69.1%) of U.S. census tracts, respectively. The largest local, spatial correlations between RI-NHB + H and EJI occurred in the southeast, southwest, and parts of the west coast, where both are high. For NHB and NHW mothers, the association between EJI and birthweight percentiles was increasingly negative at higher levels of RI-NHB + H. Among Hispanic mothers, the association was negative at mid RI levels, but not at high RI levels. Our results underscore the changing nature of segregation in the U.S. and illuminate cumulative impacts experienced by NHB and Latino populations on reproductive health.
- 9 March 2026
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 195 (6) , 1526-1536
Open AccessBeyond Black and White: relationships between segregation, environmental burden, and birth outcomes among Black and Latino populations
Segregation measures over time likely mask the movement of Latinos into predominantly non-Hispanic Black (NHB) areas. Due to systematic disinvestment, the co-location of NHB and Latinos may correlate with environmental and social stressors. We construct a combined racial isolation (RI) measure for Blacks and Latinos for the 72 246 contiguous U.S. census tracts. We compare trends (1990-2015) in RI of NHB individuals and RI of NHB and Hispanic individuals (RI-NHB + H). We estimate correlations between RI-NHB + H and CDC Environmental Justice Index (EJI) components. We assess associations between EJI, RI-NHB + H, and birthweight percentiles using North Carolina detailed birth records (n = 504 363; 2015-2019). Between 1990-2015, RI-NHB + H and RI-NHB increased in most (88.7%) and the majority (69.1%) of U.S. census tracts, respectively. The largest local, spatial correlations between RI-NHB + H and EJI occurred in the southeast, southwest, and parts of the west coast, where both are high. For NHB and NHW mothers, the association between EJI and birthweight percentiles was increasingly negative at higher levels of RI-NHB + H. Among Hispanic mothers, the association was negative at mid RI levels, but not at high RI levels. Our results underscore the changing nature of segregation in the U.S. and illuminate cumulative impacts experienced by NHB and Latino populations on reproductive health.
- Open Access
- 16 January 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Environment International
- Vol. 208, 110079
Prenatal greenness, air pollution, and birthweight: Assessing sensitive windows of exposure and sub-populations in a multi-exposure setting
- 16 January 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Environment International
- Vol. 208, 110079
Open AccessPrenatal greenness, air pollution, and birthweight: Assessing sensitive windows of exposure and sub-populations in a multi-exposure setting
- 26 December 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Environmental Research
- Vol. 292, 123641
A scoping review on the impact of ambient temperature on human infertility
- 26 December 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Environmental Research
- Vol. 292, 123641
A scoping review on the impact of ambient temperature on human infertility
- Open Access
Is Fluoride the Culprit? Revisiting Evidence on Environmental Origins of Chronic Kidney Disease of Uncertain Etiology (CKDu): A Narrative Review
Fluoride is increasingly discussed as a geogenic risk factor for chronic kidney disease of uncertain etiology (CKDu); an epidemic of kidney disease is affecting hot tropical farming communities worldwide. Emerging evidence continues to support the association between high-fluoride exposure and kidney injury, particularly in regions with high fluoride levels. However, while fluoride’s geogenic nature leads to prolonged exposure through water and food sources, the direct impact on kidney health remains incompletely understood. This review explores the relationship between fluoride exposure and adverse kidney health outcomes, especially in the context of CKDu, synthesizing findings from epidemiological studies conducted worldwide. While a broad range of studies show widespread dental fluorosis prevalence in regions with high environmental fluoride levels in Sri Lanka, India, China, and Mexico, such correlation was not evident for CKDu and environmental fluoride levels. Notably, the spatial distribution patterns of CKDu and exposure risk through high fluoride levels in drinking water exhibit some inconsistencies, suggesting fluoride alone may not be the sole driver of CKDu. This review underscores the kidney health risks of fluoride exposure while emphasizing the need for further studies that consider multiple interacting factors beyond fluoride exposure in examination of environmental triggers of CKDu.
Open AccessIs Fluoride the Culprit? Revisiting Evidence on Environmental Origins of Chronic Kidney Disease of Uncertain Etiology (CKDu): A Narrative Review
Fluoride is increasingly discussed as a geogenic risk factor for chronic kidney disease of uncertain etiology (CKDu); an epidemic of kidney disease is affecting hot tropical farming communities worldwide. Emerging evidence continues to support the association between high-fluoride exposure and kidney injury, particularly in regions with high fluoride levels. However, while fluoride’s geogenic nature leads to prolonged exposure through water and food sources, the direct impact on kidney health remains incompletely understood. This review explores the relationship between fluoride exposure and adverse kidney health outcomes, especially in the context of CKDu, synthesizing findings from epidemiological studies conducted worldwide. While a broad range of studies show widespread dental fluorosis prevalence in regions with high environmental fluoride levels in Sri Lanka, India, China, and Mexico, such correlation was not evident for CKDu and environmental fluoride levels. Notably, the spatial distribution patterns of CKDu and exposure risk through high fluoride levels in drinking water exhibit some inconsistencies, suggesting fluoride alone may not be the sole driver of CKDu. This review underscores the kidney health risks of fluoride exposure while emphasizing the need for further studies that consider multiple interacting factors beyond fluoride exposure in examination of environmental triggers of CKDu.
- Open Access
- 7 November 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Communications Medicine
- Vol. 5 (1) , 1-13
A case-crossover analysis of short-term PM2.5 exposure and COVID19-related hospitalizations in the National Clinical Cohort Collaborative
Background Studies show associations between air pollution exposure and coronavirus 2019 (COVID19) hospitalizations, but have not substantially explored regional differences. In this study, we estimate associations between shorter-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and hospitalization among individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods This study utilized data from 72,385 patients (78,504 hospitalizations) with a hospital-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020. Daily PM2.5 concentrations from ground-based monitors were averaged to generate 2, 5, and 21-day average exposures prior to hospitalization. We used a time-stratified case-crossover approach to estimate associations between PM2.5 and COVID19-related hospitalizations in 57 Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs) across the United States (US). We subsequently conducted nationwide and region-specific random effects meta-analysis. Results In the random effects meta-analysis, a 1 µg/m3 increase in 2, 5, and 21-day average PM2.5 are associated with a 0.61% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 0.12, 1.11); 0.91% (CI = 0.15, 1.67); and 0.04% (CI = −2.70, 2.85) increase in COVID19-related hospitalization risk, respectively. We observe substantial heterogeneity in the associations by region with the largest adverse associations in the South. Conclusions Higher concentrations of PM2.5 are associated with higher risk of COVID19-related hospitalizations. Given the geographic heterogeneity observed, studies exploring factors, such as PM2.5 exposure, that could explain differences in COVID19 risks may help to understand the COVID19 pandemic and aid in preparing for future ones.
- 7 November 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Communications Medicine
- Vol. 5 (1) , 1-13
Open AccessA case-crossover analysis of short-term PM2.5 exposure and COVID19-related hospitalizations in the National Clinical Cohort Collaborative
Background Studies show associations between air pollution exposure and coronavirus 2019 (COVID19) hospitalizations, but have not substantially explored regional differences. In this study, we estimate associations between shorter-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and hospitalization among individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods This study utilized data from 72,385 patients (78,504 hospitalizations) with a hospital-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020. Daily PM2.5 concentrations from ground-based monitors were averaged to generate 2, 5, and 21-day average exposures prior to hospitalization. We used a time-stratified case-crossover approach to estimate associations between PM2.5 and COVID19-related hospitalizations in 57 Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs) across the United States (US). We subsequently conducted nationwide and region-specific random effects meta-analysis. Results In the random effects meta-analysis, a 1 µg/m3 increase in 2, 5, and 21-day average PM2.5 are associated with a 0.61% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 0.12, 1.11); 0.91% (CI = 0.15, 1.67); and 0.04% (CI = −2.70, 2.85) increase in COVID19-related hospitalization risk, respectively. We observe substantial heterogeneity in the associations by region with the largest adverse associations in the South. Conclusions Higher concentrations of PM2.5 are associated with higher risk of COVID19-related hospitalizations. Given the geographic heterogeneity observed, studies exploring factors, such as PM2.5 exposure, that could explain differences in COVID19 risks may help to understand the COVID19 pandemic and aid in preparing for future ones.
- Open Access
- 30 November 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Public Health
- Vol. 24 (1) , 1-12
Residential instability, neighborhood deprivation, and outcomes for children
Residential instability and neighborhood conditions may shape children’s health and development, but it is unclear whether all residential moves are equally destabilizing, and the extent to which moving to neighborhoods with different conditions can improve children’s outcomes. Most studies estimating causal effects of these factors on children’s health or development use smaller, geographically constrained, urban cohorts. In a racially/ethnically and socioeconomically diverse statewide cohort including urban and rural communities, we investigate effects of residential instability, neighborhood deprivation, and their intersection on childhood educational outcomes. We construct a statewide dataset that links North Carolina birth records (2002–2005) with lead testing data (2003–2015) and 4th grade standardized test scores (2013–2016). A composite census tract-level neighborhood deprivation index (NDI) is linked with individuals based on residence at birth, lead testing, and 4th grade. Outcomes of interest are 4th grade test scores in reading and mathematics. We use multinomial propensity scores to estimate effects of residential instability and neighborhood deprivation on test scores. Children who moved between only high deprivation neighborhoods had lower reading test scores (-0.29 [95% CI: -0.59, -0.015]) compared to children who resided in high deprivation neighborhoods but did not move. Children who resided in a high deprivation neighborhood at birth and subsequently moved to a low deprivation neighborhood(s) had higher test scores compared to those who moved between only high deprivation neighborhoods (1.59 [0.90, 2.28]). Additionally, children who move from high to low deprivation neighborhoods earlier had larger improvements. Being residentially stable, even while residing in a high deprivation neighborhood, is associated with improved educational outcomes. However, there is also a larger positive effect of moving from high to low deprivation neighborhoods. Our findings have important implications, particularly given the increasing segregation of neighborhoods by socioeconomic status and the housing affordability crisis in the United States. Partnerships between housing programs, early childhood education and services, and health care providers, which address evictions and broader issues, may help address health inequalities rooted in childhood exposures and experiences.
- 30 November 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Public Health
- Vol. 24 (1) , 1-12
Open AccessResidential instability, neighborhood deprivation, and outcomes for children
Residential instability and neighborhood conditions may shape children’s health and development, but it is unclear whether all residential moves are equally destabilizing, and the extent to which moving to neighborhoods with different conditions can improve children’s outcomes. Most studies estimating causal effects of these factors on children’s health or development use smaller, geographically constrained, urban cohorts. In a racially/ethnically and socioeconomically diverse statewide cohort including urban and rural communities, we investigate effects of residential instability, neighborhood deprivation, and their intersection on childhood educational outcomes. We construct a statewide dataset that links North Carolina birth records (2002–2005) with lead testing data (2003–2015) and 4th grade standardized test scores (2013–2016). A composite census tract-level neighborhood deprivation index (NDI) is linked with individuals based on residence at birth, lead testing, and 4th grade. Outcomes of interest are 4th grade test scores in reading and mathematics. We use multinomial propensity scores to estimate effects of residential instability and neighborhood deprivation on test scores. Children who moved between only high deprivation neighborhoods had lower reading test scores (-0.29 [95% CI: -0.59, -0.015]) compared to children who resided in high deprivation neighborhoods but did not move. Children who resided in a high deprivation neighborhood at birth and subsequently moved to a low deprivation neighborhood(s) had higher test scores compared to those who moved between only high deprivation neighborhoods (1.59 [0.90, 2.28]). Additionally, children who move from high to low deprivation neighborhoods earlier had larger improvements. Being residentially stable, even while residing in a high deprivation neighborhood, is associated with improved educational outcomes. However, there is also a larger positive effect of moving from high to low deprivation neighborhoods. Our findings have important implications, particularly given the increasing segregation of neighborhoods by socioeconomic status and the housing affordability crisis in the United States. Partnerships between housing programs, early childhood education and services, and health care providers, which address evictions and broader issues, may help address health inequalities rooted in childhood exposures and experiences.
- 1 September 2024
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Environmental Health Perspectives
- Vol. 132 (9) , 97003
Spatial Variability in Relationships between Early Childhood Lead Exposure and Standardized Test Scores in Fourth Grade North Carolina Public School Students (2013–2016)
Exposure to lead during childhood is detrimental to children's health. The extent to which the association between lead exposure and elementary school academic outcomes varies across geography is not known. Estimate associations between blood lead levels (BLLs) and fourth grade standardized test scores in reading and mathematics in North Carolina using models that allow associations between BLL and test scores to vary spatially across communities. We link geocoded, individual-level, standardized test score data for North Carolina public school students in fourth grade (2013-2016) with detailed birth records and blood lead testing data retrieved from the North Carolina childhood blood lead state registry on samples typically collected at 1-6 y of age. BLLs were categorized as: (reference), , and . We then fit spatially varying coefficient models that incorporate information sharing (smoothness), across neighboring communities via a Gaussian Markov random field to provide a global estimate of the association between BLL and test scores, as well as census tract-specific estimates (i.e., spatial coefficients). Models adjusted for maternal- and child-level covariates and were fit separately for reading and math. The average BLL across the 91,706 individuals in the analysis dataset was . Individuals were distributed across 2,002 (out of 2,195) census tracts in North Carolina. In models adjusting for child sex, birth weight percentile for gestational age, and Medicaid participation as well as maternal race/ethnicity, educational attainment, marital status, and tobacco use, BLLs of , and were associated with overall lower reading test scores of [95% confidence interval (CI): , ], (, ), and (, ), respectively. For BLLs of , , and , spatial coefficients-that is, tract-specific adjustments in reading test score relative to the "global" coefficient-ranged from to 2.52, to 3.90, to 7.85, and to 4.33, respectively. Results for mathematics were similar to those for reading. The association between lead exposure and reading and mathematics test scores exhibits considerable heterogeneity across North Carolina communities. These results emphasize the need for prevention and mitigation efforts with respect to lead exposures everywhere, with special attention to locations where the cognitive impact is elevated. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13898.- 1 September 2024
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Environmental Health Perspectives
- Vol. 132 (9) , 97003
Spatial Variability in Relationships between Early Childhood Lead Exposure and Standardized Test Scores in Fourth Grade North Carolina Public School Students (2013–2016)
Exposure to lead during childhood is detrimental to children's health. The extent to which the association between lead exposure and elementary school academic outcomes varies across geography is not known. Estimate associations between blood lead levels (BLLs) and fourth grade standardized test scores in reading and mathematics in North Carolina using models that allow associations between BLL and test scores to vary spatially across communities. We link geocoded, individual-level, standardized test score data for North Carolina public school students in fourth grade (2013-2016) with detailed birth records and blood lead testing data retrieved from the North Carolina childhood blood lead state registry on samples typically collected at 1-6 y of age. BLLs were categorized as: (reference), , and . We then fit spatially varying coefficient models that incorporate information sharing (smoothness), across neighboring communities via a Gaussian Markov random field to provide a global estimate of the association between BLL and test scores, as well as census tract-specific estimates (i.e., spatial coefficients). Models adjusted for maternal- and child-level covariates and were fit separately for reading and math. The average BLL across the 91,706 individuals in the analysis dataset was . Individuals were distributed across 2,002 (out of 2,195) census tracts in North Carolina. In models adjusting for child sex, birth weight percentile for gestational age, and Medicaid participation as well as maternal race/ethnicity, educational attainment, marital status, and tobacco use, BLLs of , and were associated with overall lower reading test scores of [95% confidence interval (CI): , ], (, ), and (, ), respectively. For BLLs of , , and , spatial coefficients-that is, tract-specific adjustments in reading test score relative to the "global" coefficient-ranged from to 2.52, to 3.90, to 7.85, and to 4.33, respectively. Results for mathematics were similar to those for reading. The association between lead exposure and reading and mathematics test scores exhibits considerable heterogeneity across North Carolina communities. These results emphasize the need for prevention and mitigation efforts with respect to lead exposures everywhere, with special attention to locations where the cognitive impact is elevated. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13898.- 9 August 2024
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 194 (3) , 730-737
The association between long-term PM2.5 exposure and risk for pancreatic cancer: an application of social informatics
There is a profound need to identify modifiable risk factors to screen and prevent pancreatic cancer. Air pollution, including fine particulate matter (PM2.5), is increasingly recognized as a risk factor for cancer. We conducted a case-control study using data from the electronic health record (EHR) of Duke University Health System, 15-year residential history, NASA satellite fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and neighborhood socioeconomic data. Using deterministic and probabilistic linkage algorithms, we linked residential history and EHR data to quantify long term PM2.5 exposure. Logistic regression models quantified the association between a one interquartile range (IQR) increase in PM2.5 concentration and pancreatic cancer risk. The study included 203 cases and 5027 controls (median age of 59 years, 62% female, 26% Black). Individuals with pancreatic cancer had higher average annual exposure (9.4 μg/m3) as compared to IQR increase in average annual PM2.5 was associated with greater odds of pancreatic cancer (OR=1.20; 95% CI: 1.00-1.44). These findings highlight the link between elevated PM2.5 exposure and increased pancreatic cancer risk. They may inform screening strategies for high-risk populations and guide air pollution policies to mitigate exposure.
- 9 August 2024
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 194 (3) , 730-737
The association between long-term PM2.5 exposure and risk for pancreatic cancer: an application of social informatics
There is a profound need to identify modifiable risk factors to screen and prevent pancreatic cancer. Air pollution, including fine particulate matter (PM2.5), is increasingly recognized as a risk factor for cancer. We conducted a case-control study using data from the electronic health record (EHR) of Duke University Health System, 15-year residential history, NASA satellite fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and neighborhood socioeconomic data. Using deterministic and probabilistic linkage algorithms, we linked residential history and EHR data to quantify long term PM2.5 exposure. Logistic regression models quantified the association between a one interquartile range (IQR) increase in PM2.5 concentration and pancreatic cancer risk. The study included 203 cases and 5027 controls (median age of 59 years, 62% female, 26% Black). Individuals with pancreatic cancer had higher average annual exposure (9.4 μg/m3) as compared to IQR increase in average annual PM2.5 was associated with greater odds of pancreatic cancer (OR=1.20; 95% CI: 1.00-1.44). These findings highlight the link between elevated PM2.5 exposure and increased pancreatic cancer risk. They may inform screening strategies for high-risk populations and guide air pollution policies to mitigate exposure.
- 26 October 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Environmental Research
- Vol. 240 (Pt 1) , 117509
Weekly prenatal PM2.5 and NO2 exposures in preterm, early term, and full term infants: Decrements in birth weight and critical windows of susceptibility
- 26 October 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Environmental Research
- Vol. 240 (Pt 1) , 117509
Weekly prenatal PM2.5 and NO2 exposures in preterm, early term, and full term infants: Decrements in birth weight and critical windows of susceptibility