Hirendra Nath Banerjee
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Hirendra Nath Banerjee has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Mukesh Verma
National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health
4 shared publications Mukesh Verma
Department of Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Elizabeth City State University/University of North Carolina, Elizabeth City, NC 27909, USA ; 2 Methods and Technologies Branch, Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Rockville, MD 20850, USA
2 shared publicationsDavid Kinkebiel
University of Nebraska Medical Center
1 shared publicationGwyneth Hyman
Department of Biological Sciences and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Elizabeth City State University, University of North Carolina, Campus Box 930, 1704 Weeksville Road, Elizabeth City, NC, 27909, USA
1 shared publicationJeffrey M. Rousch
Elizabeth City State University, University of North Carolina
1 shared publicationVinod Manglik
Elizabeth City State University, University of North Carolina
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 February 2016
- Vol. 4 (4) , 5
Intraoperative brain cancer detection with Raman spectroscopy in humans
- 1 February 2016
- Vol. 4 (4) , 5
Open AccessIntraoperative brain cancer detection with Raman spectroscopy in humans
- Open Access
Metabolomic Approaches in Cancer Epidemiology
Metabolomics is the study of low molecular weight molecules or metabolites produced within cells and biological systems. It involves technologies such as mass spectrometry (MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) that can measure hundreds of thousands of unique chemical entities (UCEs). The metabolome provides one of the most accurate reflections of cellular activity at the functional level and can be leveraged to discern mechanistic information during normal and disease states. The advantages of metabolomics over other “omics” include its high sensitivity and ability to enable the analysis of relatively few metabolites compared with the number of genes and messenger RNAs (mRNAs). In clinical samples, metabolites are more stable than proteins or RNA. In fact, metabolomic profiling in basic, epidemiologic, clinical, and translational studies has revealed potential new biomarkers of disease and therapeutic outcome and has led to a novel mechanistic understanding of pathogenesis. These potential biomarkers include novel metabolites associated with cancer initiation, regression, and recurrence. Unlike genomics or even proteomics, however, the degree of metabolite complexity and heterogeneity within biological systems presents unique challenges that require specialized skills and resources to overcome. This article discusses epidemiologic studies of altered metabolite profiles in several cancers as well as challenges in the field and potential approaches to overcoming them.
Open AccessMetabolomic Approaches in Cancer Epidemiology
Metabolomics is the study of low molecular weight molecules or metabolites produced within cells and biological systems. It involves technologies such as mass spectrometry (MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) that can measure hundreds of thousands of unique chemical entities (UCEs). The metabolome provides one of the most accurate reflections of cellular activity at the functional level and can be leveraged to discern mechanistic information during normal and disease states. The advantages of metabolomics over other “omics” include its high sensitivity and ability to enable the analysis of relatively few metabolites compared with the number of genes and messenger RNAs (mRNAs). In clinical samples, metabolites are more stable than proteins or RNA. In fact, metabolomic profiling in basic, epidemiologic, clinical, and translational studies has revealed potential new biomarkers of disease and therapeutic outcome and has led to a novel mechanistic understanding of pathogenesis. These potential biomarkers include novel metabolites associated with cancer initiation, regression, and recurrence. Unlike genomics or even proteomics, however, the degree of metabolite complexity and heterogeneity within biological systems presents unique challenges that require specialized skills and resources to overcome. This article discusses epidemiologic studies of altered metabolite profiles in several cancers as well as challenges in the field and potential approaches to overcoming them.
- 1 January 2015
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 379-390
Using 2D-DIGE-MS to Identify Biomarkers for Brain Cancer
- 1 January 2015
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 379-390
Using 2D-DIGE-MS to Identify Biomarkers for Brain Cancer
- 8 November 2014
- Published by Springer Nature
- Vol. 1238, 511-521
Epigenetic Approaches in Glioblastoma Multiforme and Their Implication in Screening and Diagnosis
Epigenetic modifications have been reported in a number of non-germ-line tumor types. Epigenetic modifications to the genome, especially DNA methylation and histone modifications, affect gene expression causing increased risk for cancers and other diseases. We have summarized information about DNA methylation percentages in Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) line HTB-12, alveolar cell carcinoma, and acute lymphocytic leukemia samples and determined H3 (K27) methyltransferase activity in GBM and leukemia cells and made comparisons to H3 (K27) methyltransferase activity in normal astrocyte, lung, and lymphocyte cells. GBM and alveolar cell carcinoma gDNA possessed lower gDNA methylation percentages compared to normal cells. Methyl-sensitive cut counting analysis (MSCC) showed fold decreases in GBM CpG methylation sites for genes PBK, KIF23, COL6A3, and LOX. There was no significant difference in CpG DNA methylation, but less histone methyltransferase activity in acute lymphocytic leukemia compared to normal cells. GBM possessed increased histone methyltransferase activity compared to normal samples. Challenges in the field in diagnosis and prognosis for cancer risk especially with regard to the results of this work are discussed.
- 8 November 2014
- Published by Springer Nature
- Vol. 1238, 511-521
Epigenetic Approaches in Glioblastoma Multiforme and Their Implication in Screening and Diagnosis
Epigenetic modifications have been reported in a number of non-germ-line tumor types. Epigenetic modifications to the genome, especially DNA methylation and histone modifications, affect gene expression causing increased risk for cancers and other diseases. We have summarized information about DNA methylation percentages in Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) line HTB-12, alveolar cell carcinoma, and acute lymphocytic leukemia samples and determined H3 (K27) methyltransferase activity in GBM and leukemia cells and made comparisons to H3 (K27) methyltransferase activity in normal astrocyte, lung, and lymphocyte cells. GBM and alveolar cell carcinoma gDNA possessed lower gDNA methylation percentages compared to normal cells. Methyl-sensitive cut counting analysis (MSCC) showed fold decreases in GBM CpG methylation sites for genes PBK, KIF23, COL6A3, and LOX. There was no significant difference in CpG DNA methylation, but less histone methyltransferase activity in acute lymphocytic leukemia compared to normal cells. GBM possessed increased histone methyltransferase activity compared to normal samples. Challenges in the field in diagnosis and prognosis for cancer risk especially with regard to the results of this work are discussed.
- 8 November 2014
- Published by Springer Nature
- Vol. 1238, 469-485
Epigenetic Inhibitors
Traditional treatments for cancer include chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. Recently, epigenetic inhibitors have been found to be very effective in cancer treatment. Epigenetic changes such as DNA methylation, histone deacetylation, and microRNA (miRNA) expression are capable of silencing the expression of tumor suppressor genes and inducing oncogenes, leading to clonal proliferation of tumor cells. Methyltransferase inhibitors and histone deacetylase inhibitors have attracted the attention of researchers and clinicians because they provide an alternative therapeutic regime in some diseases, including cancer. Epigenetic changes are characterized by altered gene expression without any changes in the nucleotide sequences of DNA. In addition, epigenetic changes are dynamic and can be reversed by epigenetic inhibitors. Drugs that inhibit DNA methylation or histone deacetylation have been studied for the reactivation of tumor suppressor genes and repression of cancer cell growth. Epigenetic inhibitors work alone or in combination with other therapeutic agents. To date, several epigenetic inhibitors have been approved for cancer treatment. The main challenge in the field of epigenetic inhibitors is their lack of specificity. Their mechanisms of action and potential in treating cancer are described in this article.
- 8 November 2014
- Published by Springer Nature
- Vol. 1238, 469-485
Epigenetic Inhibitors
Traditional treatments for cancer include chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. Recently, epigenetic inhibitors have been found to be very effective in cancer treatment. Epigenetic changes such as DNA methylation, histone deacetylation, and microRNA (miRNA) expression are capable of silencing the expression of tumor suppressor genes and inducing oncogenes, leading to clonal proliferation of tumor cells. Methyltransferase inhibitors and histone deacetylase inhibitors have attracted the attention of researchers and clinicians because they provide an alternative therapeutic regime in some diseases, including cancer. Epigenetic changes are characterized by altered gene expression without any changes in the nucleotide sequences of DNA. In addition, epigenetic changes are dynamic and can be reversed by epigenetic inhibitors. Drugs that inhibit DNA methylation or histone deacetylation have been studied for the reactivation of tumor suppressor genes and repression of cancer cell growth. Epigenetic inhibitors work alone or in combination with other therapeutic agents. To date, several epigenetic inhibitors have been approved for cancer treatment. The main challenge in the field of epigenetic inhibitors is their lack of specificity. Their mechanisms of action and potential in treating cancer are described in this article.
- Open Access
- 1 January 2014
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1-9
Using 2D-DIGE-MS to Identify Biomarkers for Brain Cancer
- 1 January 2014
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1-9
Open AccessUsing 2D-DIGE-MS to Identify Biomarkers for Brain Cancer