Anna Germundsson Hauge
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Anna Germundsson Hauge has a total of 18 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Anette Kilander
Department of Virology; Division of Infectious Disease Control; Norwegian Institute of Public Health; Oslo Norway
1 shared publication- Anja Bråthen Kristoffersen
Norwegian Veterinary Institute, P.O. box 750, Sentrum, NO-0106, Oslo, Norway
1 shared publication - Bjørn Lium
Norwegian Veterinary Institute, P.O. Box 750, 0106, Oslo, Norway.
1 shared publication Britt Gjerset
Section of Virology; Norwegian Veterinary Institute; Oslo Norway
1 shared publication- Carl Andreas Grøntvedt
Norwegian Veterinary Institute, P.O. Box 750 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo, Norway
1 shared publication - Christine Monceyron Jonassen
National Veterinary Institute, P.O. Box 750 Sentrum, 0106, Oslo, Norway
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 4 December 2014
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Veterinary Research
- Vol. 10 (1) , 1-14
Adverse effects of Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infection on growth performance of Norwegian pigs - a longitudinal study at a boar testing station
Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infection in Norwegian pigs was largely subclinical. This study tested the hypothesis that the infection causes negligible impact on pigs’ growth performance in terms of feed conversion efficiency, daily feed intake, daily growth, age on reaching 100 kg bodyweight and overall feed intake. A sample of 1955 pigs originating from 43 breeding herds was classified into five infection status groups; seronegative pigs (n = 887); seropositive pigs (n = 874); pigs positive for virus at bodyweight between 33 kg and 60 kg (n = 123); pigs positive for virus at bodyweight between 61 kg and 80 kg (n = 34) and pigs positive for virus at bodyweight between 81 kg and 100 kg (n = 37). Each pig had daily recordings of feed intake and bodyweight from 33 kg to 100 kg. Marginal effects of the virus infection on the outcomes were estimated by multi-level linear regression, which accounted for known fixed effects (breed, birthdate, average daily feed intake and growth phase) and random effects (cluster effects of pig and herd). The seropositive and virus positive pigs had decreased (P value<0.05) growth performance compared to seronegative pigs even though feed intake was not decreased. Reduced feed conversion efficiency led to lower average daily growth, additional feed requirement and longer time needed to reach the 100 kg bodyweight. The effects were more marked (P value<0.03) in pigs infected at a younger age and lasted a longer period. Despite increased feed intake observed, their growth rates were lower and they took more time to reach 100 kg bodyweight compared to the seronegative pigs. Our study rejected the null hypothesis that the virus infection had negligible adverse effects on growth performance of Norwegian pigs.
- 4 December 2014
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Veterinary Research
- Vol. 10 (1) , 1-14
Open AccessAdverse effects of Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infection on growth performance of Norwegian pigs - a longitudinal study at a boar testing station
Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infection in Norwegian pigs was largely subclinical. This study tested the hypothesis that the infection causes negligible impact on pigs’ growth performance in terms of feed conversion efficiency, daily feed intake, daily growth, age on reaching 100 kg bodyweight and overall feed intake. A sample of 1955 pigs originating from 43 breeding herds was classified into five infection status groups; seronegative pigs (n = 887); seropositive pigs (n = 874); pigs positive for virus at bodyweight between 33 kg and 60 kg (n = 123); pigs positive for virus at bodyweight between 61 kg and 80 kg (n = 34) and pigs positive for virus at bodyweight between 81 kg and 100 kg (n = 37). Each pig had daily recordings of feed intake and bodyweight from 33 kg to 100 kg. Marginal effects of the virus infection on the outcomes were estimated by multi-level linear regression, which accounted for known fixed effects (breed, birthdate, average daily feed intake and growth phase) and random effects (cluster effects of pig and herd). The seropositive and virus positive pigs had decreased (P value<0.05) growth performance compared to seronegative pigs even though feed intake was not decreased. Reduced feed conversion efficiency led to lower average daily growth, additional feed requirement and longer time needed to reach the 100 kg bodyweight. The effects were more marked (P value<0.03) in pigs infected at a younger age and lasted a longer period. Despite increased feed intake observed, their growth rates were lower and they took more time to reach 100 kg bodyweight compared to the seronegative pigs. Our study rejected the null hypothesis that the virus infection had negligible adverse effects on growth performance of Norwegian pigs.
- Open Access
- 14 November 2013
- Published by Wiley in Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
- Vol. 7, 21-26
Swine influenza in Norway: a distinct lineage of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus
Since the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus was first introduced to the Norwegian pig population in September 2009, it has repeatedly been detected in pigs in Norway. No other subtypes of influenza virus are circulating in Norwegian pigs. To follow the diversity of A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses circulating in pigs in Norway and to investigate the relationship between viruses circulating in Norwegian pigs and in humans. Between January 2011 and January 2013, nasal swabs from 507 pigs were tested for A(H1N1)pdm09 virus by real‐time RT‐PCR. The hemagglutinin (HA) gene of virus‐positive samples was sequenced and compared with publically available sequences from viruses circulating in humans at the time. Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of the HA gene showed that the A(H1N1)pdm09 virus circulating in Norwegian pigs early in 2011 resembled the A(H1N1)pdm09 virus circulating in humans during this time. Viruses detected in pigs by the end of 2011 had acquired four characteristic amino acid substitutions (N31D, S84I S164F, and N473D) and formed a distinct phylogenetic group. A(H1N1)pdm09 virus detected in Norwegian pigs by the end of 2011 formed a distinct genetic lineage. Also, our findings indicate that reverse‐zoonotic transmission from humans to pigs of the A(H1N1)pdm09 virus is still important.
- 14 November 2013
- Published by Wiley in Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
- Vol. 7, 21-26
Open AccessSwine influenza in Norway: a distinct lineage of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus
Since the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus was first introduced to the Norwegian pig population in September 2009, it has repeatedly been detected in pigs in Norway. No other subtypes of influenza virus are circulating in Norwegian pigs. To follow the diversity of A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses circulating in pigs in Norway and to investigate the relationship between viruses circulating in Norwegian pigs and in humans. Between January 2011 and January 2013, nasal swabs from 507 pigs were tested for A(H1N1)pdm09 virus by real‐time RT‐PCR. The hemagglutinin (HA) gene of virus‐positive samples was sequenced and compared with publically available sequences from viruses circulating in humans at the time. Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of the HA gene showed that the A(H1N1)pdm09 virus circulating in Norwegian pigs early in 2011 resembled the A(H1N1)pdm09 virus circulating in humans during this time. Viruses detected in pigs by the end of 2011 had acquired four characteristic amino acid substitutions (N31D, S84I S164F, and N473D) and formed a distinct phylogenetic group. A(H1N1)pdm09 virus detected in Norwegian pigs by the end of 2011 formed a distinct genetic lineage. Also, our findings indicate that reverse‐zoonotic transmission from humans to pigs of the A(H1N1)pdm09 virus is still important.
- Open Access
- 10 April 2013
- Published by Springer Nature in Virology Journal
- Vol. 10 (1) , 112
Molecular and epidemiological characterization of avian influenza viruses from gulls and dabbling ducks in Norway
Wild aquatic birds constitute the natural reservoir for avian influenza viruses (AIVs). Separate Eurasian and American AIV gene pools exist. Here, the prevalence and diversity of AIVs in gulls and dabbling ducks in Norway were described. The influence of host species and temporal changes on AIV prevalence was examined. Five AIVs from Norway, including three from common gull (Larus canus), were analyzed along with 10 available AIV genomes from gulls in Eurasia to search for evidence of intracontinental and intercontinental reassortment of gene segments encoding the internal viral proteins.
- 10 April 2013
- Published by Springer Nature in Virology Journal
- Vol. 10 (1) , 112
Open AccessMolecular and epidemiological characterization of avian influenza viruses from gulls and dabbling ducks in Norway
Wild aquatic birds constitute the natural reservoir for avian influenza viruses (AIVs). Separate Eurasian and American AIV gene pools exist. Here, the prevalence and diversity of AIVs in gulls and dabbling ducks in Norway were described. The influence of host species and temporal changes on AIV prevalence was examined. Five AIVs from Norway, including three from common gull (Larus canus), were analyzed along with 10 available AIV genomes from gulls in Eurasia to search for evidence of intracontinental and intercontinental reassortment of gene segments encoding the internal viral proteins.