Jens Ulrich

Background/Objectives: Malignant melanoma is a highly aggressive cancer associated with significant mortality, underscoring the need for continued research efforts. COMBI-EU (NCT03944356) is a prospective, non-interventional study that aims to assess adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib usage in clinical practice, the impact of AE management, and the usage of app-based documentation on treatment adherence. Methods: Adults with complete surgical resection of stage III BRAF V600-mutant cutaneous melanoma were included. The primary endpoint was median time on treatment (TOT). Adverse event (AE) management was classified as either a high or low level of management. The rating of AE management based on a self-developed algorithm and rules from COMBI-APlus was used to analyze the impact of AE management on TOT. App-based documentation of medication intake and patient-reported outcomes (CANKADO PRO-React; version 6.0, 06.03.2019) was offered. Results: For 225 patients, the median TOT was 11.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.7, 12.0). Treatment was completed by 138 patients (61.3%); 37 (16.4%) discontinued due to treatment-related AEs (TRAEs). TRAEs (≥1) were experienced by 181 patients (80.4%); the most common was pyrexia (38.2%). High-level AE management showed a trend toward improved treatment adherence (high versus low level: hazard ratio [HR]: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.49, 1.14); this improvement was significant with pyrexia management (HR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.93). Seventy-nine (35%) and 33 patients (15%) intended to use and eventually used the app, respectively. A similar proportion of patients remained on treatment for 12 months irrespective of app usage (use, 39.4% vs. non-use, 36.5%). Conclusions: High-level TRAE management showed a trend toward improved treatment adherence, which was statistically significant for pyrexia. Optional use of an app did not influence treatment adherence.

Zusammenfassung Die Darstellung von Veränderungen der Haut, der Subkutis und v. a. der regionären Lymphknoten mithilfe des hochauflösenden Ultraschalls ist fester Bestandteil der dermatologischen Routinediagnostik. Diese erfolgt überwiegend mithilfe elektronischer Scanner, die mit Frequenzen zwischen 7,5 und 20 MHz arbeiten (konventionelle Ultraschalldiagnostik). Daneben existieren sehr hochfrequente Ultraschallsysteme (bis 100 MHz), die eher für spezielle wissenschaftliche Fragestellungen verwendet werden. Die Ultraschalldiagnostik weist gegenüber anderen Schnittbildverfahren eine Reihe von Vorteilen auf, ist aber mehr als diese von der individuellen Erfahrung des Untersuchers abhängig. Strukturierte Aus‑, Weiter- und ständige Fortbildung sind für die Ultraschalldiagnostik, auch in der Dermatologie, unerlässlich. Der vorliegende Beitrag beschreibt die physikalisch-gerätetechnischen und administrativen Grundlagen sowie die wichtigsten Indikationen zur konventionellen Sonographie in der Dermatologie.

Knowledge on the real-world characteristics and outcomes of pembrolizumab-treated advanced melanoma patients in Germany and on the value of different real-world endpoints as surrogates for overall survival (OS) is limited. A sample of 664 pembrolizumab-treated patients with advanced melanoma from the German registry ADOReg was used. We examined OS, real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), real-world time to next treatment (rwTtNT), and real-world time on treatment (rwToT). Spearman’s rank and iterative multiple imputation (IMI)-based correlation coefficients were computed between the OS and the rwPFS, rwTtNT, and rwToT and reported for the first line of therapy and the overall sample. The median OS was 30.5 (95%CI 25.0–35.4) months, the rwPFS was 3.9 months (95%CI 3.5–4.9), the rwTtNT was 10.7 months (95%CI 9.0–12.9), and the rwToT was 6.2 months (95%CI 5.1–6.8). The rwTtNT showed the highest correlation with the OS based on the IMI (rIMI = 0.83), Spearman rank correlations (rs = 0.74), followed by the rwToT (rIMI = 0.74 and rs = 0.65) and rwPFS (rIMI = 0.69 and rs = 0.56). The estimates for the outcomes and correlations were similar for the overall sample and those in first-line therapy. The median OS was higher compared to recent real-world studies, supporting the effectiveness of pembrolizumab in regular clinical practice. The rwTtNT may be a valuable OS surrogate, considering the highest correlation was observed with the OS among the investigated real-world endpoints.

Re-induction with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) needs to be considered in many patients with uveal melanoma (UM) due to limited systemic treatment options. Here, we provide hitherto the first analysis of ICB re-induction in UM. A total of 177 patients with metastatic UM treated with ICB were included from German skin cancer centers and the German national skin cancer registry (ADOReg). To investigate the impact of ICB re-induction, two cohorts were compared: patients who received at least one ICB re-induction (cohort A, n = 52) versus those who received only one treatment line of ICB (cohort B, n = 125). In cohort A, a transient benefit of overall survival (OS) was observed at 6 and 12 months after the treatment start of ICB. There was no significant difference in OS between both groups (p = 0.1) with a median OS of 16.2 months (cohort A, 95% CI: 11.1–23.8) versus 9.4 months (cohort B, 95% CI: 6.1–14.9). Patients receiving re-induction of ICB (cohort A) had similar response rates compared to those receiving ICB once. Re-induction of ICB may yield a clinical benefit for a small subgroup of patients even after resistance or development of toxicities.

Background: Since there is no standardized and effective treatment for advanced uveal melanoma (UM), the prognosis is dismal once metastases develop. Due to the availability of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in the real-world setting, the prognosis of metastatic UM has improved. However, it is unclear how the presence of hepatic and extrahepatic metastasis impacts the response and survival after ICB. Methods: A total of 178 patients with metastatic UM treated with ICB were included in this analysis. Patients were recruited from German skin cancer centers and the German national skin cancer registry (ADOReg). To investigate the impact of hepatic metastasis, two cohorts were compared: patients with liver metastasis only (cohort A, n = 55) versus those with both liver and extra-hepatic metastasis (cohort B, n = 123). Data were analyzed in both cohorts for response to treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The survival and progression probabilities were calculated with the Kaplan–Meier method. Log-rank tests, χ² tests, and t-tests were performed to detect significant differences between both cohorts. Results: The median OS of the overall population was 16 months (95% CI 13.4–23.7) and the median PFS, 2.8 months (95% CI 2.5–3.0). The median OS was longer in cohort B than in cohort A (18.2 vs. 6.1 months; p = 0.071). The best objective response rate to dual ICB was 13.8% and to anti-PD-1 monotherapy 8.9% in the entire population. Patients with liver metastases only had a lower response to dual ICB, yet without significance (cohort A 8.7% vs. cohort B 16.7%; p = 0.45). Adverse events (AE) occurred in 41.6%. Severe AE were observed in 26.3% and evenly distributed between both cohorts. Conclusion: The survival of this large cohort of patients with advanced UM was more favorable than reported in previous benchmark studies. Patients with both hepatic and extrahepatic metastasis showed more favorable survival and higher response to dual ICB than those with hepatic metastasis only.