Adan Rios

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization in Acute Leukemia Patients Presenting With Subdural Hematoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL); it has a cure rate of approximately 50% with standard anthracycline-based chemoimmunotherapy. How-ever, the clinical outcomes of elderly unfit/frail DLBCL patients re-main suboptimal due to poor tolerance of anthracycline-containing regimens. Herein, we report a series of seven elderly unfit patients with DLBCL who were treated with a reduced-intensity anthracycline-free chemoimmunotherapy (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone) regimen combined with lenalidomide (R-2 -COP). Five patients received R-2-COP as first-line therapy, and two patients were treated for relapsed DLBCL. Four patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL and two with relapsed disease achieved complete remission. The R-2-COP regimen was well tolerated. Interim positron emission tomography (PET) scans in four patients after two to three cycles showed a complete metabolic response. At a median follow-up of 24 months, six patients remain in complete remission. R-2-COP is an effective anthracycline-free regimen with encouraging clinical activity in elderly DLBCL patients who are unfit for standard anthracycline-containing regimens.

Primary lymphoma of the bone (PLB) is a rare lymphoproliferative neoplasm that can present either as solitary or multiple bone lesions. We report four patients with PLB who were successfully treated with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) followed by consolidative radiotherapy. All patients achieved a complete remission and had excellent long-term outcomes. PLB has a favorable response to combined modality treatment with chemoimmunotherapy and radiation. Long-term outcomes of PLB tend to be better than those of non-osseous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare immune-mediated disease pre-dominantly seen in women and triggered by various environmental factors. Rarely, AIH can be triggered by an underlying malignancy. We report a woman in her 60s who presented with markedly abnormal liver biochemical tests. Serology was positive for anti-smooth muscle anti-bodies and a liver biopsy confirmed AIH. During the hospital course, she developed sepsis and acute renal failure requiring dialysis support. Serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) showed a monoclonal IgG kappa protein of 1.92 g/dL and a bone marrow biopsy revealed 7% clonal plasma cells. She had lytic lesions on skeletal survey confirming the diagnosis of a coexisting multiple myeloma (MM). Given her markedly abnormal liver chemistries, we decided to treat the AIH first and use the steroids (an important anti-myeloma therapy) as a bridge to the specific treatment of the MM once her clinical condition improved. She was treated with oral prednisone and azathioprine for AIH. One month later, a marked improvement in liver biochemical test results was noted and she was started on oral ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone. She received palliative radiotherapy to the lumbar spine (L2), left fe-mur, and ischium lesions. This case highlights a rare co-occurrence of AIH and MM, the underlying mechanism of which is unknown.

A 49-year-old woman with systemic lupus erythematosus, lupus nephritis and chronic congestive heart failure presenting with “bulky” cervical lymphadenopathy was diagnosed with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) stage IIIB (positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan and bone marrow biopsy). She received one cycle of bleomycin, dacarbazine, and vinblastine to debulk the tumor. Given her advanced heart failure, doxorubicin was not administered. After the first cycle of chemotherapy, she was switched to nivolumab plus brentuximab vedotin (BV) and received two doses 4 weeks apart, finishing in July 2019. A restaging PET-CT in June 2019 showed a complete remission (CR). After the second course of treatment, she was unable to tolerate more treatments and hence was placed on a surveillance program. She remains in CR after a follow-up of 3 years. This case highlights the role of a tailored treatment approach to optimize clinical outcomes in uniquely complex clinical circumstances. BV in combination with nivolumab is a reasonable alternative regimen in HL ineligible for cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Mutation of the tumor suppressor gene, TP53, is associated with abysmal survival outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although it is the most commonly mutated gene in cancer, its occurrence is observed in only 5–10% of de novo AML, and in 30% of therapy related AML (t-AML). TP53 mutation serves as a prognostic marker of poor response to standard-of-care chemotherapy, particularly in t-AML and AML with complex cytogenetics. In light of a poor response to traditional chemotherapy and only a modest improvement in outcome with hypomethylation-based interventions, allogenic stem cell transplant is routinely recommended in these cases, albeit with a response that is often short lived. Despite being frequently mutated across the cancer spectrum, progress and enthusiasm for the development of p53 targeted therapeutic interventions is lacking and to date there is no approved drug that mitigates the effects of TP53 mutation. There is a mounting body of evidence indicating that p53 mutants differ in functionality and form from typical AML cases and subsequently display inconsistent responses to therapy at the cellular level. Understanding this pathobiological activity is imperative to the development of effective therapeutic strategies. This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the effects of TP53 on the hematopoietic system, to describe its varying degree of functionality in tumor suppression, and to illustrate the need for the adoption of personalized therapeutic strategies to target distinct classes of the p53 mutation in AML management.

Primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) is a rare type of large B-cell lymphoma associated with human herpesvirus 8 (HHV8) infection. Patients with PEL usually present with an effusion, but occasionally with an extracavitary mass. In this study, we reported a cohort of 70 patients with PEL: 67 men and 3 women with a median age of 46 years (range 26–91). Of these, 56 (80%) patients had human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, eight were HIV-negative, and six had unknown HIV status. Nineteen (27%) patients had Kaposi sarcoma. Thirty-five (50%) patients presented with effusion only, 27 (39%) had an extracavitary mass or masses only, and eight (11%) had both effusion and extracavitary disease. The lymphoma cells showed plasmablastic, immunoblastic, or anaplastic morphology. All 70 (100%) cases were positive for HHV8. Compared with effusion-only PEL, patients with extracavitary-only PEL were younger (median age, 42 vs. 52 years, p = 0.001), more likely to be HIV-positive (88.9% vs. 68.6%, p = 0.06) and EBV-positive (76.9% vs. 51.9%, p = 0.06), and less often positive for CD45 (69.2% vs. 96.2%, p = 0.01), EMA (26.7% vs. 100%, p = 0.0005), and CD30 (60% vs. 81.5%, p = 0.09). Of 52 (50%) patients with clinical follow-up, 26 died after a median follow-up time of 40.0 months (range 0–96), and the median overall survival was 42.5 months. The median OS for patients with effusion-only and with extracavitary-only PEL were 30.0 and 37.9 months, respectively (p = 0.34), and patients with extracavitary-only PEL had a lower mortality rate at the time of last follow-up (35% vs. 61.5%, p = 0.07). The median OS for HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients were 42.5 and 6.8 months, respectively (p = 0.57), and they had a similar mortality rate of 50% at last follow-up. In conclusion, patients presenting with effusion-only versus extracavitary-only disease are associated with different clinicopathologic features. PEL is an aggressive lymphoma with a poor prognosis, regardless of extracavitary presentation or HIV status.

Cancer immunotherapy is based on the idea that the immune system can be stimulated to eliminate malignant tumors, as it can be stimulated against microbial infections. The first systematic use of this concept can be attributed to Dr. William B. Coley. Dr. Coley injected microbial organisms into tumors with therapeutic intent [ 1]. Since then, a better understanding of the immune system led to the production of a variety of immunotherapeutic interventions to treat cancer, with modest success. Such interventions include monoclonal antibodies, recombinant cytokines and cellular strategies including chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) [ 2]. In contrast to the injections of microbial organisms given with the intent to activate the immune system, these modalities of immunotherapy are essentially passive in their action [ 3]. The 2018 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded jointly to James Allison, Ph.D. and Tasuku Honjo, M.D., Ph.D., for their independent work pioneering strategies that, in contrast to passive therapeutic strategies, enhance the immune response to tumor cells. These strategies dramatically increase the potential of the immune system as the fourth pillar of cancer treatment, together with surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy [ 4] (https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2018/summary). Dr. Allison and Dr. Honjo are basic research scientists, but their research quickly found clinical translation. Therapeutic outcomes of various forms of cancer that did not respond to more direct forms of therapy have significantly improved for certain patients using this specific type of immunotherapy. Checkpoint therapy can respond to non-refractory cancer with significantly better safety profiles than other therapies. In a minority of patients, long-term regression has been achieved. These results have given new life to the hope of better cancer control or cure [ 5]. Future cancer therapy is likely to be revolutionized with checkpoint therapy as foundational used with other therapeutics modalities.