Françoise Gofflot

Hoxa5 encodes a transcription factor essential for embryonic patterning and organogenesis, with sustained expression in hindbrain precerebellar nuclei during postnatal development. Given prior evidence implicating HOXA5 in synaptogenesis and early postnatal circuit maturation, we investigated whether its inactivation during this critical developmental window contributes to neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD)-related phenotypes. Using previously generated transcriptomic data, we identified multiple deregulated genes classified as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) risk genes in the SFARI database, several of which are associated with a cerebellar phenotype in mice. We then performed a comprehensive behavioral assessment across motor, social, stereotypical, anxiety-related, and attentional domains in a postnatal inactivation mouse model (Hoxa5-cKO). Motor coordination, learning, gait, and sensorimotor functions were preserved. Social behavior assays yielded no consistent genotype-dependent effects, although results were sensitive to analytical methods and cohort variability. In contrast, Hoxa5-cKO mice exhibited increased stereotypical behaviors, including elevated scratching and marble burying, in the absence of anxiety- or locomotion-related confounds. Importantly, interpretation of social and cognitive phenotypes was impacted by well-known constraints of behavioral neuroscience. We discuss these downfalls and propose additional guidelines. Altogether, our findings indicate that postnatal Hoxa5 deficiency selectively enhances stereotyped behaviors without broadly affecting motor or social functions. The data support a model in which HOXA5 acts as a modulator of postnatal precerebellar circuit connectivity and/or function, with subtle behavioral consequences that require further research in specific genetic or environmental contexts.

The development of multicellular organisms requires proper interplays between cell-autonomous genetic programs controlled by combinations of transcription factors that regulate the differentiation of distinct cell populations and non-cell autonomous processes that coordinate the proliferation, the fate, the survival, the respective location, and the proper interactions of these populations. During the development of the nervous system, non-cell autonomous mechanisms determine neuronal fate, survival, distribution, axon guidance, and connectivity. Although similar processes are suggested to be at work in the formation of spinal motor circuits, the molecular mechanisms involved remain mostly elusive. Here, we provide evidence that the Onecut transcription factors regulate a non-cell autonomous mechanism that modulate pre-motor interneuron development. We show that conditional inactivation of the Onecut factors in spinal motor neurons affects the differentiation and the positioning of pre-motor interneuron populations. We identify that Neurotrophin-3 produced by motor neurons under the control of the Onecut factors non-cell autonomously regulate the production and the distribution of pre-motor interneuron populations. Thus, we elucidated one of the non-cell autonomous mechanisms that coordinate the formation of the spinal motor circuits.

The development of multicellular organisms requires proper interplays between cell-autonomous genetic programs controlled by combinations of transcription factors that regulate the differentiation of distinct cell populations and non-cell autonomous processes that coordinate the proliferation, the fate, the survival, the respective location, and the proper interactions of these populations. During the development of the nervous system, non-cell autonomous mechanisms determine neuronal fate, survival, distribution, axon guidance, and connectivity. Although similar processes are suggested to be at work in the formation of spinal motor circuits, the molecular mechanisms involved remain mostly elusive. Here, we provide evidence that the Onecut transcription factors regulate a non-cell autonomous mechanism that modulate pre-motor interneuron development. We show that conditional inactivation of the Onecut factors in spinal motor neurons affects the differentiation and the positioning of pre-motor interneuron populations. We identify that Neurotrophin-3 produced by motor neurons under the control of the Onecut factors non-cell autonomously regulate the production and the distribution of pre-motor interneuron populations. Thus, we elucidated one of the non-cell autonomous mechanisms that coordinate the formation of the spinal motor circuits.

Primary cultures of neural cells are important key tools for basic and translational neuroscience research. These primary cell cultures are classically generated from the rodent brain hippocampus or cortex and optimized for enrichment in neurons at the expense of glial cells. Importantly, considerable differences exist in neuronal cell populations and in glial cell contribution between different brain regions. Because many basic and translational research projects aim to identify mechanisms underlying brainstem neuronal networks that affect major vital functions, primary cultures representative of cell populations present in the hindbrain are required. However, the preparation of primary cultures of brainstem/hindbrain neurons is scarcely described in the literature, limiting the possibilities for studying the development and physiology of these brain regions in vitro. The present report describes a reliable protocol to dissociate and culture in vitro embryonic mouse fetal hindbrain neurons in a defined culture medium, while control of astrocytes’ expansion was attained by using a chemically defined, serum-free supplement, namely CultureOne™. The neuronal cells maintained according to this protocol differentiate and, by 10 days in vitro, they develop extensive axonal and dendritic branching. Using immunofluorescence, we further characterized the different cell populations and neuronal subtypes. Patch–clamp recordings demonstrate the excitable nature of these neurons, while colocalization of pre- and postsynaptic neuronal markers showed that neurons form mature synapses, suggesting the establishment of functional networks in vitro. The cultures produced by this method show excellent reproducibility and can be used for molecular, biochemical, and physiological analyses, as illustrated here for tamoxifen-induced Cre recombination in genetically-modified neural cells.

HOX genes play essential roles in patterning the anteroposterior axis of animal embryos and in the formation of various organs. In mammals, there are 39 HOX genes organized into four clusters (HOXA–D) located on different chromosomes. In relationship with their orderly arrangement along the chromosomes, these genes show nested expression patterns which imply that embryonic territories co-express multiple HOX genes along the main body axis. Interactomic database entries, as well as a handful of publications, support that some HOX proteins can form homodimers or interact with other HOX proteins. However, the consequences of HOX protein interactions have been poorly investigated and remain largely elusive. In this study, we compiled a repository of all HOX–HOX interactions from available databases, and taking HOXA1, HOXA2, and HOXA5 as examples, we investigated the capacity of HOX proteins to form homo- and heterodimers. We revealed that while the DNA-binding domain, the homeodomain, is not necessary for HOXA1 homodimerization, the nuclear localization of the dimerization is dependent on the homeodomain, particularly the integrity of the third helix of HOXA1. Furthermore, we demonstrated that HOXA1 can influence the localization of HOXA1 when it is deprived of the homeodomain, increasing its abundance in the chromatin-containing fraction. Moreover, HOXA1 nuclear homodimerization occurs independently of the integrity of the hexapeptide and, consequently, of its well-known interactor, the homeodomain protein PBX. These results hint at a potential involvement of dimerization in the complex landscape of HOX regulatory mechanisms.

Paralog factors are considered to ensure the robustness of biological processes by providing redundant activity in cells where they are co-expressed. However, the specific contribution of each factor is frequently underestimated. In the developing spinal cord, multiple families of transcription factors successively contribute to differentiate an initially homogenous population of neural progenitors into a myriad of neuronal subsets with distinct molecular, morphological, and functional characteristics. The LIM-homeodomain transcription factors Lhx3, Lhx4, Isl1 and Isl2 promote the segregation and differentiation of spinal motor neurons and V2 interneurons. Based on their high sequence identity and their similar distribution, the Lhx3 and Lhx4 paralogs are considered to contribute similarly to these processes. However, the specific contribution of Lhx4 has never been studied. Here, we provide evidence that Lhx3 and Lhx4 are present in the same cell populations during spinal cord development. Similarly to Lhx3, Lhx4 can form multiproteic complexes with Isl1 or Isl2 and the nuclear LIM interactor NLI. Lhx4 can stimulate a V2-specific enhancer more efficiently than Lhx3 and surpasses Lhx3 in promoting the differentiation of V2a interneurons in chicken embryo electroporation experiments. Finally, Lhx4 inactivation in mice results in alterations of differentiation of the V2a subpopulation, but not of motor neuron production, suggesting that Lhx4 plays unique roles in V2a differentiation that are not compensated by the presence of Lhx3. Thus, Lhx4 could be the major LIM-HD factor involved in V2a interneuron differentiation during spinal cord development and should be considered for in vitro differentiation of spinal neuronal populations.

While the functions of HOX genes have been and remain extensively studied in distinct model organisms from flies to mice, the molecular biology of HOX proteins remains poorly documented. In particular, the mechanisms involved in regulating the activity of HOX proteins have been poorly investigated. Nonetheless, based on data available from other well-characterized transcription factors, it can be assumed that HOX protein activity must be finely tuned in a cell-type-specific manner and in response to defined environmental cues. Indeed, records in protein–protein interaction databases or entries in post-translational modification registries clearly support that HOX proteins are the targets of multiple layers of regulation at the protein level. In this context, we review here what has been reported and what can be inferred about how the activities of HOX proteins are regulated by their intracellular distribution.

For this Special Issue of The International Journal of Develomental Biology on Hox genes, the guest editors met Jacqueline Deschamps for an interview about her research career dedicated to understanding how Hox gene expression is initiated, maintained and functionally utilized in the mouse embryo. We describe here her journey through some of the main discoveries which led to our current knowledge about how Hox genes contribute to shaping the animal body plan. This journey was a human adventure also, of more than 30 years, in the light of which Jacqueline Deschamps delivers here messages to the younger generations of scientists.

Forty years ago, Ed Lewis established for the first time the organization of homeotic genes along the chromosome and its importance in embryo patterning. To celebrate this seminal discovery, the International Journal of Developmental Biology decided to launch a Special Issue. It is with honor, pleasure, but also humility that we accepted the challenge of acting as guest editors for this Special Issue. We entitled the issue Hox genes: past, present and future of master regulator genes since despite four decades of amazing discoveries, numerous questions remain unanswered, which open new avenues of research. This is well-acknowledged by Robb Krumlauf and Jacqueline Deschamps in the Introductory articles. The high-level reviews and original research reports collected in this Special Issue also reflect the wide-range and important topics that are still in the spotlights including the origins of Hox genes, the regulatory events controlling their expression, the mechanisms driving the action of HOX proteins, and their multiple roles in normal development and pathogenesis.