Marg McKenzie
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Marg McKenzie has a total of 41 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Robin McLeod
5 shared publications- Emily A. Pearsall
Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital Joseph and Wolf Lebovic Health Complex, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada
4 shared publications J. Charles Victor
4 shared publications- Allan Okrainec
Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
3 shared publications Emily Pearsall
3 shared publicationsMary-Anne Aarts
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 1 April 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Gastroenterology
- Vol. 152 (5) , S1256
Ready to go home? Patients' experiences of the discharge process following care in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for colorectal surgery
- 1 April 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Gastroenterology
- Vol. 152 (5) , S1256
Ready to go home? Patients' experiences of the discharge process following care in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for colorectal surgery
- 1 April 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Gastroenterology
- Vol. 152 (5) , S1213
Emergency Room Visits and Readmissions Following Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Program
- 1 April 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Gastroenterology
- Vol. 152 (5) , S1213
Emergency Room Visits and Readmissions Following Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Program
- 1 April 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Gastroenterology
- Vol. 150 (4) , S1186
586 Compliance With Removal of Urinary Catheter Guideline Recommendations Leads to Improved Outcome in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Patients
- 1 April 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Gastroenterology
- Vol. 150 (4) , S1186
586 Compliance With Removal of Urinary Catheter Guideline Recommendations Leads to Improved Outcome in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Patients
- 1 April 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
- Vol. 12, e33
Patient feedback on the implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programme (iERAS): A qualitative analysis
- 1 April 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
- Vol. 12, e33
Patient feedback on the implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programme (iERAS): A qualitative analysis
- Open Access
- 17 July 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Implementation Science
- Vol. 10 (1) , 1-11
Successful implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery programme for elective colorectal surgery: a process evaluation of champions’ experiences
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal evidence-based approach to patient care that has become the standard in elective colorectal surgery. Implemented globally, ERAS programmes represent a considerable change in practice for many surgical care providers. Our current understanding of specific implementation and sustainability challenges is limited. In January 2013, we began a 2-year ERAS implementation for elective colorectal surgery in 15 academic hospitals in Ontario. The purpose of this study was to understand the process enablers and barriers that influenced the success of ERAS implementation in these centres with a view towards supporting sustainable change. A qualitative process evaluation was conducted from June to September 2014. Semi-structured interviews with implementation champions were completed, and an iterative inductive thematic analysis was conducted. Following a data-driven analysis, the Normalization Process Theory (NPT) was used as an analytic framework to understand the impact of various implementation processes. The NPT constructs were used as sensitizing concepts, reviewed against existing data categories for alignment and fit. Fifty-eight participants were included: 15 surgeons, 14 anaesthesiologists, 15 nurses, and 14 project coordinators. A number of process-related implementation enablers were identified: champions’ belief in the value of the programme, the fit and cohesion of champions and their teams locally and provincially, a bottom-up approach to stakeholder engagement targeting organizational relationship-building, receptivity and support of division leaders, and the normalization of ERAS as everyday practice. Technical enablers identified included effective integration with existing clinical systems and using audit and feedback to report to hospital stakeholders. There was an overall optimism that ERAS implementation would be sustained, accompanied by concern about long-term organizational support. Successful ERAS implementation is achieved by a complex series of cognitive and social processes which previously have not been well described. Using the Normalization Process Theory as a framework, this analysis demonstrates the importance of champion coherence, external and internal relationship building, and the strategic management of a project’s organization-level visibility as important to ERAS uptake and sustainability.
- 17 July 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Implementation Science
- Vol. 10 (1) , 1-11
Open AccessSuccessful implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery programme for elective colorectal surgery: a process evaluation of champions’ experiences
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal evidence-based approach to patient care that has become the standard in elective colorectal surgery. Implemented globally, ERAS programmes represent a considerable change in practice for many surgical care providers. Our current understanding of specific implementation and sustainability challenges is limited. In January 2013, we began a 2-year ERAS implementation for elective colorectal surgery in 15 academic hospitals in Ontario. The purpose of this study was to understand the process enablers and barriers that influenced the success of ERAS implementation in these centres with a view towards supporting sustainable change. A qualitative process evaluation was conducted from June to September 2014. Semi-structured interviews with implementation champions were completed, and an iterative inductive thematic analysis was conducted. Following a data-driven analysis, the Normalization Process Theory (NPT) was used as an analytic framework to understand the impact of various implementation processes. The NPT constructs were used as sensitizing concepts, reviewed against existing data categories for alignment and fit. Fifty-eight participants were included: 15 surgeons, 14 anaesthesiologists, 15 nurses, and 14 project coordinators. A number of process-related implementation enablers were identified: champions’ belief in the value of the programme, the fit and cohesion of champions and their teams locally and provincially, a bottom-up approach to stakeholder engagement targeting organizational relationship-building, receptivity and support of division leaders, and the normalization of ERAS as everyday practice. Technical enablers identified included effective integration with existing clinical systems and using audit and feedback to report to hospital stakeholders. There was an overall optimism that ERAS implementation would be sustained, accompanied by concern about long-term organizational support. Successful ERAS implementation is achieved by a complex series of cognitive and social processes which previously have not been well described. Using the Normalization Process Theory as a framework, this analysis demonstrates the importance of champion coherence, external and internal relationship building, and the strategic management of a project’s organization-level visibility as important to ERAS uptake and sustainability.
- 1 February 2010
- Vol. 53 (1) , 64-6
CAGS and ACS evidence based reviews in surgery. 32: Use of a surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality.
- 1 February 2010
- Vol. 53 (1) , 64-6
CAGS and ACS evidence based reviews in surgery. 32: Use of a surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality.