Sven Gottwald
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Sven Gottwald has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Andreas Römpp
Bioanalytical Sciences and Food Analysis, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
1 shared publication - Bernhard Spengler
Justus Liebig University Giessen
1 shared publication - Birgit Samans
Justus Liebig University
1 shared publication Dhaka Ram Bhandari
Justus Liebig University Giessen, Institute of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Schubertstrasse 60, Building 16, 35392 Giessen, Germany
1 shared publicationQing Wang
Justus Liebig University Giessen, Department of Plant Breeding, IFZ, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
1 shared publication- Stefanie Lück
Department of Plant Breeding, Justus-Liebig University, Institute of Agronomy and Plant Breeding I, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, Giessen, D-35392, Germany
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 16 September 2015
- Published by Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) in The Analyst
- Vol. 140 (22) , 7696-7709
High resolution mass spectrometry imaging of plant tissues: towards a plant metabolite atlas
Label-free chemical imaging of a wide range of metabolites in all major plant organs acquired at high spatial resolution.
- 16 September 2015
- Published by Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) in The Analyst
- Vol. 140 (22) , 7696-7709
Open AccessHigh resolution mass spectrometry imaging of plant tissues: towards a plant metabolite atlas
Label-free chemical imaging of a wide range of metabolites in all major plant organs acquired at high spatial resolution.
- Open Access
- 2 August 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Genomics
- Vol. 13 (1) , 369
Jasmonate and ethylene dependent defence gene expression and suppression of fungal virulence factors: two essential mechanisms of Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat?
Background: Fusarium head blight (FHB) caused by Fusarium species like F. graminearum is a devastating disease of wheat (Triticum aestivum) worldwide. Mycotoxins such as deoxynivalenol produced by the fungus affect plant and animal health, and cause significant reductions of grain yield and quality. Resistant varieties are the only effective way to control this disease, but the molecular events leading to FHB resistance are still poorly understood. Transcriptional profiling was conducted for the winter wheat cultivars Dream (moderately resistant) and Lynx (susceptible). The gene expressions at 32 and 72 h after inoculation with Fusarium were used to trace possible defence mechanisms and associated genes. A comparative qPCR was carried out for selected genes to analyse the respective expression patterns in the resistant cultivars Dream and Sumai 3 (Chinese spring wheat). Results: Among 2,169 differentially expressed genes, two putative main defence mechanisms were found in the FHB-resistant Dream cultivar. Both are defined base on their specific mode of resistance. A non-specific mechanism was based on several defence genes probably induced by jasmonate and ethylene signalling, including lipid-transfer protein, thionin, defensin and GDSL-like lipase genes. Additionally, defence-related genes encoding jasmonate-regulated proteins were up-regulated in response to FHB. Another mechanism based on the targeted suppression of essential Fusarium virulence factors comprising proteases and mycotoxins was found to be an essential, induced defence of general relevance in wheat. Moreover, similar inductions upon fungal infection were frequently observed among FHB-responsive genes of both mechanisms in the cultivars Dream and Sumai 3. Conclusions: Especially ABC transporter, UDP-glucosyltransferase, protease and protease inhibitor genes associated with the defence mechanism against fungal virulence factors are apparently active in different resistant genetic backgrounds, according to reports on other wheat cultivars and barley. This was further supported in our qPCR experiments on seven genes originating from this mechanism which revealed similar activities in the resistant cultivars Dream and Sumai 3. Finally, the combination of early-stage and steady-state induction was associated with resistance, while transcript induction generally occurred later and temporarily in the susceptible cultivars. The respective mechanisms are attractive for advanced studies aiming at new resistance and toxin management strategies.
- 2 August 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Genomics
- Vol. 13 (1) , 369
Open AccessJasmonate and ethylene dependent defence gene expression and suppression of fungal virulence factors: two essential mechanisms of Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat?
Background: Fusarium head blight (FHB) caused by Fusarium species like F. graminearum is a devastating disease of wheat (Triticum aestivum) worldwide. Mycotoxins such as deoxynivalenol produced by the fungus affect plant and animal health, and cause significant reductions of grain yield and quality. Resistant varieties are the only effective way to control this disease, but the molecular events leading to FHB resistance are still poorly understood. Transcriptional profiling was conducted for the winter wheat cultivars Dream (moderately resistant) and Lynx (susceptible). The gene expressions at 32 and 72 h after inoculation with Fusarium were used to trace possible defence mechanisms and associated genes. A comparative qPCR was carried out for selected genes to analyse the respective expression patterns in the resistant cultivars Dream and Sumai 3 (Chinese spring wheat). Results: Among 2,169 differentially expressed genes, two putative main defence mechanisms were found in the FHB-resistant Dream cultivar. Both are defined base on their specific mode of resistance. A non-specific mechanism was based on several defence genes probably induced by jasmonate and ethylene signalling, including lipid-transfer protein, thionin, defensin and GDSL-like lipase genes. Additionally, defence-related genes encoding jasmonate-regulated proteins were up-regulated in response to FHB. Another mechanism based on the targeted suppression of essential Fusarium virulence factors comprising proteases and mycotoxins was found to be an essential, induced defence of general relevance in wheat. Moreover, similar inductions upon fungal infection were frequently observed among FHB-responsive genes of both mechanisms in the cultivars Dream and Sumai 3. Conclusions: Especially ABC transporter, UDP-glucosyltransferase, protease and protease inhibitor genes associated with the defence mechanism against fungal virulence factors are apparently active in different resistant genetic backgrounds, according to reports on other wheat cultivars and barley. This was further supported in our qPCR experiments on seven genes originating from this mechanism which revealed similar activities in the resistant cultivars Dream and Sumai 3. Finally, the combination of early-stage and steady-state induction was associated with resistance, while transcript induction generally occurred later and temporarily in the susceptible cultivars. The respective mechanisms are attractive for advanced studies aiming at new resistance and toxin management strategies.