CFCaroline Field

Caroline Field

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Caroline Field has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Track 2: A Holistic Approach to Evaluating the Sustainability and Resiliency of Buried Drainage Structures Relative to Climate Change

    by Elaina Sutley, Donovan Finn, Caroline Field, Jarrod Loerzel

    Investing in sustainability and resilience in the context of civil infrastructures systems delivers value by reducing disruption, speeding recove |

  • Improved Methodologies for the Prediction of Footfall-Induced Vibration

    by Michael Willford, Caroline Field, Peter Young

    The increasing use of high strength materials, modern architectural expression and the desire for high-tech building environments has led to an increasing need to consider vibration performance as a key design objective for buildings and other structures. Human footfall is a significant source of vibration and if its effects are not assessed accurately during the design of a facility the workspaces may be rendered unusable for sensitive equipment or uncomfortable for occupants. In view of the importance of achieving an acceptable vibration environment in modern facilities it is perhaps surprising that the design methods employed by most structural and vibration engineers comprise very simple and semi-empirical hand calculations based on research available in the 1970s. In order to provide clients with greater confidence in the performance of their structures Arup has developed new and more accurate `performance based' prediction procedures incorporating recent comprehensive experimental research into footfall forces, and taking advantage of the capabilities of modern design-office computer software. The new methods are not limited by the approximations and inaccuracies inherent in the old empirical approaches, and extensive calibration against field measurements has shown them to be far more reliable than other methods currently in use. This new approach can bring substantial cost benefits in some cases as well as reduction in risk through accurate quantification of performance. This paper describes the methodology in detail and compares with predictions from other methods and measured data.