Jingwei Luo

Jingwei Luo

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Jingwei Luo has a total of 78 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Kai Wang

    Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China

    13 shared publications
  • Yuan Qu

    Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China

    13 shared publications
  • Runye Wu

    Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China

    12 shared publications
  • Jianghu Zhang

    Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China

    10 shared publications
  • Ye Zhang

    Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China

    10 shared publications
  • Guozhen Xu

    Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China

    9 shared publications

Latest Publications

  • Failure Patterns Within Different Histological Types in Sinonasal Malignancies: Making the Complex Simple

    by Qian Liu, Meng Sun, Zekun Wang, Yuan Qu, Jianghu Zhang, Kai Wang, Runye Wu, Ye Zhang, Xiaodong Huang, Xuesong Chen, et al.

    ObjectiveTo analyze the failure patterns in patients with different histological subtypes of sinonasal malignancies (SNMs).Study DesignRetrospectively gathered data.SettingAcademic university hospital.MethodsPatients with SNMs treated at a tertiary referral center between January 1999 and January 2019 were included. We assessed the failure patterns within different histological subtypes.ResultsThe study included 897 patients. The median follow-up time was 100 months. Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) had a moderate risk of developing local recurrence (LR) and distant metastasis (DM). Compared with ACC, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), adenocarcinoma (AC), soft tissue sarcoma (STS), and mucosal melanoma (MM) were classified as a high LR risk group. For DM, neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), STS, and MM were in the high-risk group.ConclusionsACC had intermediate local and distant failure risks, while SCC, AC, STS, and MM were at high LR risks. NEC, STS, and MM were at high DM risk.


  • Feasibility of omitting contralateral neck irradiation in patients with node‐negative sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma crossing the midline

    by Qian Liu, Lixin Lun, Meng Sun, Zekun Wang, Yuan Qu, Xiaodong Huang, Xuesong Chen, Jingbo Wang, Jianghu Zhang, Kai Wang, et al.

    Background: Identifying the lymph node target volume in patients with node‐negative sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) crossing the midline poses a challenge. This study aims to address this. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinically N0 patients with tumors crossing the midline who received elective neck irradiation (ENI) from two centers between 1999 and 2019. The main endpoint was regional relapse‐free survival (RRFS). Results: We included 104 patients: 64 received bilateral ENI, and 40 received ipsilateral‐only ENI (median follow‐up time was 89.99 and 95.01 months, respectively). At 5 years, the RRFS rates were comparable (57.68% vs. 55.83%, p = 0.372), as were the contralateral RRFS (57.68% vs. 61.62%, p = 0.541). Five‐year OS, LRFS, and DMFS showed no significant difference between two groups. Conclusions: Our findings provide preliminary evidence suggesting the potential for avoiding contralateral ENI in SNSCC patients with midline crossing tumors who undergo ipsilateral ENI, covering at least level II. Validation through future prospective studies is necessary.

  • Feasibility of ipsilateral elective neck irradiation of levels Ib and II without level III in patients with node‐negative sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma

    by Qian Liu, Lixin Lun, Meng Sun, Zekun Wang, Xiaodong Huang, Xuesong Chen, Jingbo Wang, Jianghu Zhang, Yuan Qu, Kai Wang, et al.

    Background: The necessity of level III irradiation in patients with node‐negative advanced sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) is unclear.Methods: Seventy‐eight patients with advanced SNSCC were included. Survival rates were estimated and compared between treatment groups.Results: Twenty‐five patients received ipsilateral levels Ib and II irradiation (group 1) and 53 patients received ipsilateral levels Ib and II plus level III irradiation (group 2). The median follow‐up time was 75.56 months. Five‐year survival rates (regional relapse‐free survival, overall survival, local relapse‐free survival, and distant metastasis‐free survival) were similar between groups 1 and 2 (all p > 0.05). Irradiation doses to the thyroid and larynx were significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2.Conclusions: Ipsilateral irradiation of levels Ib and II neck provides similar regional control and results as irradiation of these levels plus level III, with lower irradiation doses to normal neck tissue, in patients with node‐negative advanced SNSCC.


  • Open Access

    Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection versus Open Surgery for Locally Advanced Sinonasal Malignancies in Combination with Radiotherapy

    by Qian Liu, Xiaodong Huang, Xuesong Chen, Jianghu Zhang, Jingbo Wang, Yuan Qu, Kai Wang, Runye Wu, Ye Zhang, Jianping Xiao, et al.

    Objective Our objective was to compare the long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection versus open surgery in combination with radiotherapy for locally advanced sinonasal malignancies (SNMs). Methods Data for continuous patients with sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma who received surgery (endoscopic or open surgery) combined with radiotherapy in our center between January 1999 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. A 1:1 matching with propensity scores was performed. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local recurrence rate (LRR) were evaluated. Results We identified 267 eligible patients, 90 of whom were included after matching: 45 patients in the endoscopy group and 45 in the open group. The median follow-up time was 87 months. In the endoscopic group, 84.4% of patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), with a mean gross tumor volume (GTV) dose of 68.28 Gy; in the open surgery group, 64.4% of patients received IMRT, with a mean GTV dose of 64 Gy. The 5-year OS, PFS, and LRR were 69.9, 58.6, and 24.5% in the endoscopic group and 64.6, 54.4, and 31.8% in the open surgery group, respectively. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that the surgical approach was not associated with lower OS, PFS, or LRR. The overall postoperative complications were 13% in the endoscopic group, while 21.7% in the open group. Conclusion For patients with locally advanced SNMs, minimally invasive endoscopic resection, in combination with a higher radiation dose and new radiation techniques such as IMRT, yields survival outcomes similar to those of open surgery in combination with radiotherapy.


  • Open Access

    Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma–Associated and De Novo Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Tale of Two Cities or Not

    by Zekun Wang, Ye Zhang, Jianghu Zhang, Xuesong Chen, Jingbo Wang, Runye Wu, Kai Wang, Yuan Qu, Xiaodong Huang, Jingwei Luo, et al.

    Background: Sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) can arise as either inverted papilloma–associated SCC (IP-SCC) or as de novo SCC (DN-SCC). It is controversial as to whether survival differences between IP-SCC and DN-SCC exist. Methods: Between January 2000 and December 2016, 234 patients with SNSCC were analyzed retrospectively, including 68 with IP-SCC and 166 with DN-SCC. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model were used to determine risk factors on survival outcomes. Results: The median follow-up time was 98.4 months. Before PSM, lymph node metastasis was noted to be lower in patients with IP-SCC. After PSM, the 5-year DFS, DSS and OS between IP-SCC and DN-SCC were 43.0% vs. 44.5% (p = 0.701), 49.2% vs. 56.2% (p = 0.753), and 48.2% vs. 52.9% (p = 0.978). The annual hazards of local failure, respectively, peaked at 28.4% and 27.8% for IP-SCC and DN-SCC within 12 months after treatment. Afterward, the hazards gradually decreased and the hazard for IP-SCC was always higher before approaching null. Conclusions: This study provides novel evidence to support the clinical utility of improved distinction between IP-SCC and DN-SCC. Further studies are necessary to validate these findings before considering escalation of IP-SCC.


  • Clinical Characteristics and Long-Term Outcomes following Surgery Combined with Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Patients with Frontal Sinus Malignancies

    by Ze-Kun Wang, Jun-Lin Yi, Ye Zhang, Run-Ye Wu, Jiang-Hu Zhang, Jing-Bo Wang, Xue-Song Chen, Kai Wang, Yuan Qu, Xiao-Dong Huang, et al.

    Objectives Primary frontal sinus malignancies (FSMs) are the rarest sinonasal cancers. This study aimed to determine clinicopathologic characteristics of primary FSMs and provide long-term survival outcomes. Design This study is a retrospective review. Setting The study was conducted at a tertiary medical center. Participants Patients who participated in this study were diagnosed with primary FSMs. Main Outcome Measures Median survival time is the primary outcome measure of this study. Results In this series, the median age was 48 years (30–53 years) and all patients were male. There were five cases with squamous cell carcinoma and one with osteosarcoma. All cases presented with locally advanced disease without regional lymphatic metastasis, including five cases of stage III and one case of stage II. The two most common pathways of tumor invasion were as follows: local tumor broke posteriorly through bone wall and invaded dura mater, followed by frontal lobe; local tumor infiltrated downward through the floor of frontal sinus into ethmoid sinus, thereafter invaded laterally orbit and orbital contents. All patients received surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy at the total doses of 50 to 75.95 Gy. Among them, only one patient underwent R0 resection, the rest of patients underwent R1/R2 resection. With a median survival time of 56 months (32–76 months), two patients receiving R1/R2 resection developed treatment failure and died within 5 years, including one case with local recurrence and one with local recurrence, thereafter distant metastasis. Conclusion The majority of FSMs presented with peripherally invasive progression lesions which led to a high ratio of R1/R2 resection. Surgery combined with postoperative radiotherapy might result in satisfactory efficacy.


  • Open Access

    Lymph Node Metastasis Spread Patterns and the Effectiveness of Prophylactic Neck Irradiation in Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SNSCC)

    by Qian Liu, Yuan Qu, Kai Wang, Runye Wu, Ye Zhang, Xiaodong Huang, Jianghu Zhang, Xuesong Chen, Jingbo Wang, Jianping Xiao, et al.

    Objectives: To analyze the incidence and spread of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and the effectiveness of prophylactic neck irradiation in patients with SNSCC. Methods: A total of 255 patients with SNSCC were retrospectively reviewed. The LNM spread pattern was revealed. The clinical parameters related to LNM, and the prognostic value of elective neck irradiation (ENI) were assessed. A 1:1 matching with propensity scores was performed between ENI group and observation (OBS) group. Results: The initial LNM rate was 20.8%, and the regional recurrence (RR) rate was 7.5%. Lymphatic spreading in SNSCC followed the common trajectories: a. level Ib ➔ level II ➔ level Va/level III/IV lymph nodes (LNs); b. retropharyngeal lymph nodes (RPLNs) ➔ level II LNs. The most frequently involved site was level II LNs (16.1%), followed by level Ib LNs (10.2%), RPLNs (4.7%), level III LNs (3.2%), level Va LNs (1.6%), level IVa LNs (1.4%) and level VIII LNs (0.8%). The median follow-up time was 105 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 55.7% for N0 patients and 38.5% for patients with initial N+ or N- relapse (p = 0.009). After PSM, the 5-year regional recurrence-free survival was 71.6% and 94.7% (p = 0.046) in OBS and ENI group, respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that ENI (p = 0.013) and absence of nasopharynx involvement (p = 0.026) were associated with a significantly lower RR rate. Conclusions: Patients with LNM had poorer survival than those who never experienced LNM. Lymphatic spread in SNSCC followed predictable patterns. ENI effectively reduced the RR rate in patients at high risk.


  • Open Access

    Long-term Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection Versus Open Surgery for Locally Advanced Sinonasal Malignancies in Combination With Radiotherapy

    by Qian Liu, Xiaodong Huang, Xuesong Chen, Jianghu Zhang, Jingbo Wang, Yuan Qu, Kai Wang, Runye Wu, Ye Zhang, Jianping Xiao, et al.

    Objective:To compare the long-term oncological outcomes of endoscopic resection versus open surgery in combination with radiotherapy for locally advanced sinonasal malignancies.Methods:Data for continuous patients with sinonasal epithelial tumors treated in our center between Jan 1999 and Dec 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Those who received surgery (endoscopic or open surgery) combined with radiotherapy were identified, and 1:1 matching with propensity scores was performed. The primary endpoints of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling. The local recurrence rate (LRR) was assessed by competing risk analysis.Results:We identified 267 eligible patients, 90 of whom were included after matching: 45 patients in the endoscopy group and 45 in the open group. The median follow-up time was 87 months. In the endoscopic group, 84.4% of patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), with a mean gross tumor volume (GTV) dose of 68.28 Gy; in the open surgery group, 64.4% of patients received IMRT, with a mean GTV dose of 64 Gy. The 5-year OS, PFS and LRR were 69.9%, 58.6%, and 24.5% in the endoscopic group and 64.6%, 54.4%, and 31.8% in the open surgery group, respectively. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that surgical approach was not associated with lower OS, PFS or LRR. Age, histopathology and stage were independent risk factors for OS.Conclusion:For patients with locally advanced sinonasal carcinoma, minimally invasive endoscopic resection, in combination with a higher radiation dose and new radiation techniques such as IMRT, yields survival outcomes similar to those of open surgery in combination with radiotherapy.

  • Open Access

    Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes following surgery combined with adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with frontal sinus malignancies

    by Zekun Wang, Jianghu Zhang, Runye Wu, Ye Zhang, Junlin Yi, Li Gao, Guozhen Xu, Jingwei Luo

    Objective: This study aimed to determine clinicopathologic characteristics of primary frontal sinus malignancies (FSMs) and provide long-term survival results.Materials and methods: A retrospective study of six cases of primary FSMs at our center from 2006 to 2016 was performed. The demographics characteristics, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities and survival outcomes were recorded. Results: In this series, the median age was 48 years (30-53 years) and all patients were male. There were five cases with squamous cell carcinoma, and one with osteosarcoma. All cases presented with locally advanced disease without regional lymphatic metastasis, including 5 cases of stage Ⅲ and one of stage Ⅱ. The two most common pathways of tumor invasion were as follows: local tumor broke posteriorly through bone wall and invaded dura mater, followed by frontal lobe; local tumor infiltrated downward through the floor of frontal sinus into ethmoid sinus, thereafter invaded laterally orbit and orbital contents. All patients received surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy at the total doses of 50Gy to 75.95Gy. Among them, only one patient underwent R0 resection, the rest of patients underwent R1/R2 resection. With a median survival time of 56 months (32 to 76 months), two patients receiving R1/R2 resection developed treatment failure and died within 5 years, including one case with local recurrence, and one with local recurrence thereafter distant metastasis. Conclusion: The majority of FSMs presented with peripherally invasive progression lesions, which led to a high ratio of R1/R2 resection. Surgery combined with postoperative radiotherapy might result in satisfactory efficacy.