Pasquale Trecca

Background/Objectives: Early progression (EP) occurs in a subset of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), limiting the clinical benefit of treatment, and it remains difficult to predict. Methods: We developed a multiparametric predictive model integrating baseline ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT radiomic features with clinical and biological data. A total of 242 radiomic features were extracted from each imaging modality (CT and PET), including first-order, gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), and local binary pattern (LBP-TOP) features, and combined with PET-derived metrics and clinical variables. Model development included cross-validation procedures and rigorous feature selection, followed by the training of a two-level decision tree classifier. Results: The model achieved an accuracy of 80.7% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83. Integrated analysis of CT and PET texture enabled the identification of patients at high risk of EP prior to treatment initiation. Conclusions: PET/CT-based radiomic biomarkers, combined with clinical data, can non-invasively capture tumor heterogeneity and improve risk stratification in LAPC, supporting more personalized therapeutic decision-making.

Background: Pancreatic cancer, with its poor prognosis, is frequently diagnosed in elderly patients who may be ineligible for surgery or chemoradiation due to age or comorbidities. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) offers a targeted approach by delivering precise, high-dose radiation to a limited volume in few fractions. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SBRT in elderly pancreatic cancer patients. Methods: Patients with pancreatic cancer received SBRT using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in schedules of five dose fractions tailored to the tolerance of adjacent tissues. Progression-free survival (PFS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed. Toxicities were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Results: Median follow-up was 9.5 months (range, 4–37.2 months). The 1-year, 2-year and 3-year LPFS rates were 88%, 73% and 54%, respectively (median not reached). Median PFS, MFS and OS were 29.6 months, 32.6 months, and 24.1 months, respectively. SBRT was well tolerated with acute and late toxicity rates of 6% and 9%, respectively. Conclusionsd: SBRT appears to be an effective and safe option for elderly pancreatic cancer patients, achieving high local control with minimal toxicity.

Aim: The aim was to investigate the use of comprehensive pretreatment staging with multiple diagnostic modalities, including functional imaging and minimally invasive surgical procedures, in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients. The primary objective was to detect occult metastatic disease using staging laparoscopy and 18F-FDG-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scan. The study also evaluated treatment efficacy and outcomes in LAPC patients treated with combined therapies. Materials and methods: This study was a secondary analysis of three prospective studies of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with or without induction chemotherapy (IC). The inclusion period was from December 2009 until February 2023. An intensified pretreatment staging was conducted for all LAPC patients. Patients without distant disease at initial staging, with borderline resectable or unresectable LAPC, were enrolled in CRT combination protocols (CRT with or without IC). IC regimens included GemOx or FOLFIRINOX for four cycles, followed by concurrent CRT with gemcitabine. The primary endpoint was the detection of occult metastatic disease, and secondary objectives included resection rate, treatment toxicity, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local control, and metastasis-free survival. Results: Out of the 134 LAPC patients, 33.5% were identified with metastatic disease. Of these, 23.1% had a positive exploratory laparoscopy. Additionally, 13.4% were identified as having distant metastases by 18-FDG PET/CT. The median PFS for all patients who completed CRT was 14.3 months, and the median OS was 17.2 months. Resected patients after the combined therapies demonstrated significantly improved outcomes compared tonon-resected patients (median PFS, 22.5 months vs. 9.5 months, PPPPP=0.05), and this data was confirmed at multivariate analysis (95% CI: 0.09–0.98, P=0.04). Hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities were observed during treatment, with manageable adverse events. Conclusions: The use of comprehensive pretreatment staging, including laparoscopy and 18F-FDG-PET/CT scan, is an effective approach in identifying occult metastatic disease in LAPC patients. Our findings offer valuable insights into accurate staging and treatment efficacy, providing evidence-based support for optimal management strategies in LAPC patients.

Aims: The aim of this study was to define a potential benefit of pathological complete response rate (pCR) and downstaging rate after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in relation to treatment and patient factors in locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided according to chemotherapy regimens concurrent to radiotherapy (1-drug vs. 2-drug) and according to the time interval between the end of CRT and surgery (≤8 weeks vs. >8 weeks), as well as in relation to specific relevant clinical factors. Logistic regression was used to estimate the independent factors for pCR and downstaging. Results: 269 patients were eligible for this study. Overall, pCR and downstaging rates were 26% and 75.4%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that female gender (p = 0.01) and time to surgery >8 weeks (p = 0.04) were associated with pCR; age > 70 years (p = 0.05) and time to surgery >8 weeks (p = 0.002) were correlated to downstaging. At multivariate analysis, interval time to surgery of >8 weeks was the only independent factor for both pCR and downstaging (p = 0.02; OR: 0.5, CI: 0.27–0.93 and p = 0.003; OR: 0.42, CI: 0.24–0.75, respectively). Conclusions: This study indicates that, in our population, an interval time to surgery of >8 weeks is an independent significant factor for pCR and downstaging. Further prospective studies are needed to define the best interval time.

Purpose: To evaluate the predictive value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT semiquantitative parameters of the primary tumour and CA 19-9 levels assessed before treatment in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Methods: Among one-hundred twenty patients with LAPC treated at our institution with initial chemotherapy followed by curative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) from July 2013 to January 2019, a secondary analysis with baseline ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was conducted in fifty-eight patients. Pre-treatment CA 19-9 level and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of primary tumour were measured. The receiving operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed to define the cut-off point of SUVmax, MTV, TLG and CA 19-9 values to use in prediction of early progression (EP), local progression (LP) and overall survival (OS). Areas under the curve (AUCs) were assessed for all variables. Post-test probability was calculated to evaluate the advantage for parameters combination. Results: For EP, CA 19-9 level > 698 U/mL resulted the best marker to identify patient at higher risk with OR of 5.96 (95% CI, 1.66–19.47; p = 0.005) and a Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 61%. For LP, the most significant parameter was TLG (OR 9.75, 95% CI, 1.64–57.87, p = 0.012), with PPV of 83%. For OS, the most significant parameter was MTV (OR 3.12, 95% CI, 0.9–10.83, p = 0.07) with PPV of 88%. Adding consecutively each of the other parameters, PPV to identify patients at risk resulted further increased (>90%). Conclusions: Pre-treatment CA 19-9 level, as well as MTV and TLG values of primary tumour at baseline ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and their combination, may represent significant predictors of EP, LP and OS in LAPC patients.

Radio-chemotherapy is one of the steps of multidisciplinary management in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) plays an important role in the disease pathway. The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate the feasibility and the efficacy of radiotherapy in combination with gemcitabine and EGFR targeting therapy for patients with locally advanced disease. From November 2008 through January 2012, 34 patients were included in this study. In all cases an accurate pre-treatment staging including CT scan, Endoscopic Ultra-Sonography (EUS), 18F - fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET-CT and laparoscopy with peritoneal washing was performed. External beam radiation was delivered with a total dose of 50.4 Gy (1.8 Gy per fraction). Patients were treated using 3D- conformal radiotherapy, and the clinical target volume was the primary tumor and involved lymph nodes. Gemcitabine 300 mg/m2 and Cetuximab were given weekly during radiation therapy. Ten patients (29.4 %) were excluded from the protocol because of the evidence of metastatic disease at the pre-treatment staging. Three patients refused radiochemotherapy. Twenty-one patients completed the therapy protocol. During the combined therapy grade 3–4 toxicities observed were only haematological (leukopenia 47,6 %, trombocytopenia 4.8 %, elevated gamma-GT 23.8 %, elevated alkaline phosphatase 4,8 %). Non-haematological toxicity grade 3–4 was never reported. Post-treatment workup showed partial response in five patients (24 %), stable disease in 11 patients (52 %) and disease progression in 5 patients (24 %). Two-year Local Control was 49 % (median, 18.6 months), 2-year Metastases Free Survival was 24 % (median, 10.8 months). One and two-year Overall Survival were 66 % and 28 % respectively, with a median survival time of 15.3 months. The combination of cetuximab and gemcitabine with concurrent radiation therapy provides a feasible and well tolerated treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients’ selection is crucial in order to treat patients appropriately.