Catharina A. Eggink
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Catharina A. Eggink has a total of 17 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Anna C Randag
Het Oogziekenhuis Rotterdam, Rotterdam
1 shared publicationClaudy Oliveira Dos Santos
Radboudumc, afd. Medische Microbiologie, Nijmegen
1 shared publication- Claudy Oliveira dos Santos
Department of Medical Microbiology Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen The Netherlands
1 shared publication Dirk de Korte
Department of Product and Process Development Sanquin Blood Bank Amsterdam the Netherlands
1 shared publication- Henrich A. L. van der Lee
Centre for Expertise in Mycology, Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
1 shared publication - Jelina Ye
Department of Ophthalmology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 20 May 2024
- Vol. 168
[Acute red eye].
The general physician as well as the medical specialist may be confronted with a patient with one or two red eyes. To be adequately equipped we answer a series of questions on diagnosis, treatment and referral of patients with red eyes after trauma, or with conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, uveïtis, endophthalmitis or acute glaucoma. Refer to an ophthalmologist or not?
- 20 May 2024
- Vol. 168
[Acute red eye].
The general physician as well as the medical specialist may be confronted with a patient with one or two red eyes. To be adequately equipped we answer a series of questions on diagnosis, treatment and referral of patients with red eyes after trauma, or with conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, uveïtis, endophthalmitis or acute glaucoma. Refer to an ophthalmologist or not?
- Open Access
- 29 March 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Fungi
- Vol. 7 (4) , 255
Chlorhexidine for the Treatment of Fusarium Keratitis: A Case Series and Mini Review
Fungal keratitis is difficult to treat, especially Fusarium keratitis. In vitro studies show that chlorhexidine could be an interesting option as monotherapy. We describe a case series of four patients (four eyes) with Fusarium keratitis at Radboud University Medical Center (Nijmegen, the Netherlands). The patients were treated with chlorhexidine 0.02% eye drops. The in vitro activity of eight antifungals and chlorhexidine was determined according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) broth microdilution method. We also reviewed the literature on the use of chlorhexidine in the treatment of fungal keratitis. Topical chlorhexidine was well tolerated, and all patients showed complete resolution of the keratitis upon treatment with chlorhexidine. A PubMed search of the available literature was conducted (last search 8 March 2020) and yielded two randomized clinical trials (natamycin versus chlorhexidine) and one case report addressing the treatment of fungal keratitis with chlorhexidine. Chlorhexidine was found to be safe with regard to toxicity and to be superior to natamycin in the clinical trials. Chlorhexidine showed in vitro fungicidal activity against Fusarium and clinical effectiveness in our cases, supporting further clinical evaluation. Advantages of chlorhexidine are its topical application, its general availability, its low costs, its broad-spectrum activity, and its fungicidal mechanism of action at low concentrations.
- 29 March 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Fungi
- Vol. 7 (4) , 255
Open AccessChlorhexidine for the Treatment of Fusarium Keratitis: A Case Series and Mini Review
Fungal keratitis is difficult to treat, especially Fusarium keratitis. In vitro studies show that chlorhexidine could be an interesting option as monotherapy. We describe a case series of four patients (four eyes) with Fusarium keratitis at Radboud University Medical Center (Nijmegen, the Netherlands). The patients were treated with chlorhexidine 0.02% eye drops. The in vitro activity of eight antifungals and chlorhexidine was determined according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) broth microdilution method. We also reviewed the literature on the use of chlorhexidine in the treatment of fungal keratitis. Topical chlorhexidine was well tolerated, and all patients showed complete resolution of the keratitis upon treatment with chlorhexidine. A PubMed search of the available literature was conducted (last search 8 March 2020) and yielded two randomized clinical trials (natamycin versus chlorhexidine) and one case report addressing the treatment of fungal keratitis with chlorhexidine. Chlorhexidine was found to be safe with regard to toxicity and to be superior to natamycin in the clinical trials. Chlorhexidine showed in vitro fungicidal activity against Fusarium and clinical effectiveness in our cases, supporting further clinical evaluation. Advantages of chlorhexidine are its topical application, its general availability, its low costs, its broad-spectrum activity, and its fungicidal mechanism of action at low concentrations.
- Open Access
- 15 February 2021
- Published by Wiley in Acta Ophthalmologica
- Vol. 99 (8) , 837-842
Allogeneic and autologous serum eye drops: a pilot double‐blind randomized crossover trial
Purpose: Serum eye drops (SEDs) are used to treat a variety of ocular surface defects. Serum eye drops (SEDs) are normally produced from the patient’s blood. However, not all patients can donate sufficient or suitable blood, and logistics can be challenging. Allogeneic blood from voluntary blood donors does not have these disadvantages. Our aim was to evaluate whether autologous and allogeneic SEDs have comparable efficacy and tolerability.Methods: In a prospective, double‐blind crossover trial, patients with severe dry eyes were randomized to first receive autologous SEDs for one month, followed by one‐month washout, before receiving allogeneic SEDs for 1 month; or receive the SED preparations in reverse order. The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) was the primary endpoint, and various secondary endpoints were determined. A linear mixed model with random intercept for each patient was applied per treatment group to compare the pre‐ and postoutcome measurements.Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled, of whom 15 completed the trial. When autologous SEDs were used, the mean ± SD OSDI improved from 62 ± 19 to 57 ± 18. For allogeneic SEDs, the OSDI changed from 59 ± 20 to 56 ± 23. The estimated mean difference (95% confidence interval) was −4.2 (−9.5 to 1.2) for autologous and −4.5 (−9.8 to 0.9) for allogeneic SEDs (both, not significant). Adverse events were mild and resolved completely.Conclusion: Autologous and allogeneic SEDs have comparable efficacy and tolerability for use in patients with severe dry eyes. Allogeneic SEDs are therefore an attractive alternative for patients who need SEDs but are clinically or logistically unable to donate blood.
- 15 February 2021
- Published by Wiley in Acta Ophthalmologica
- Vol. 99 (8) , 837-842
Open AccessAllogeneic and autologous serum eye drops: a pilot double‐blind randomized crossover trial
Purpose: Serum eye drops (SEDs) are used to treat a variety of ocular surface defects. Serum eye drops (SEDs) are normally produced from the patient’s blood. However, not all patients can donate sufficient or suitable blood, and logistics can be challenging. Allogeneic blood from voluntary blood donors does not have these disadvantages. Our aim was to evaluate whether autologous and allogeneic SEDs have comparable efficacy and tolerability.Methods: In a prospective, double‐blind crossover trial, patients with severe dry eyes were randomized to first receive autologous SEDs for one month, followed by one‐month washout, before receiving allogeneic SEDs for 1 month; or receive the SED preparations in reverse order. The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) was the primary endpoint, and various secondary endpoints were determined. A linear mixed model with random intercept for each patient was applied per treatment group to compare the pre‐ and postoutcome measurements.Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled, of whom 15 completed the trial. When autologous SEDs were used, the mean ± SD OSDI improved from 62 ± 19 to 57 ± 18. For allogeneic SEDs, the OSDI changed from 59 ± 20 to 56 ± 23. The estimated mean difference (95% confidence interval) was −4.2 (−9.5 to 1.2) for autologous and −4.5 (−9.8 to 0.9) for allogeneic SEDs (both, not significant). Adverse events were mild and resolved completely.Conclusion: Autologous and allogeneic SEDs have comparable efficacy and tolerability for use in patients with severe dry eyes. Allogeneic SEDs are therefore an attractive alternative for patients who need SEDs but are clinically or logistically unable to donate blood.
- 16 May 2019
- Vol. 163
[Infectious keratitis in contact lens wearers].
Infectious keratitis in contact lens wearers Infectious keratitis is a sight-threatening complication in contact lens wearers. The infection is most frequently caused by bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa). However, fungi or Acanthamoeba are found in increasing frequency. Three cases illustrate a characteristic course: patient A (11-year-old male) was treated for three weeks before the characteristic aspect of Acanthamoeba keratitis was recognized and confirmed. Patient B (45-year-old female) developed a severe corneal ulcer within 4 days; microbiological diagnostics confirmed Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis. Examination of patient C (27-year-old female) showed an infiltrate with satellites, typical of fungal keratitis. It is important to check the use of contact lenses in patients with keratitis. Referral to the ophthalmologist is mandatory: immediate in cases with an infiltrate. A dentritiform epithelial lesion in a contact lens wearer is indicative of Acanthamoeba keratitis, whereas fungal keratitis shows satellites or feathering edges. Steroids may only be prescribed by an ophthalmologist after confirmation of the causative agent.
- 16 May 2019
- Vol. 163
[Infectious keratitis in contact lens wearers].
Infectious keratitis in contact lens wearers Infectious keratitis is a sight-threatening complication in contact lens wearers. The infection is most frequently caused by bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa). However, fungi or Acanthamoeba are found in increasing frequency. Three cases illustrate a characteristic course: patient A (11-year-old male) was treated for three weeks before the characteristic aspect of Acanthamoeba keratitis was recognized and confirmed. Patient B (45-year-old female) developed a severe corneal ulcer within 4 days; microbiological diagnostics confirmed Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis. Examination of patient C (27-year-old female) showed an infiltrate with satellites, typical of fungal keratitis. It is important to check the use of contact lenses in patients with keratitis. Referral to the ophthalmologist is mandatory: immediate in cases with an infiltrate. A dentritiform epithelial lesion in a contact lens wearer is indicative of Acanthamoeba keratitis, whereas fungal keratitis shows satellites or feathering edges. Steroids may only be prescribed by an ophthalmologist after confirmation of the causative agent.