Gerhard Pierer
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Gerhard Pierer has a total of 9 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alois Gratwohl
University of Basel
1 shared publication - Daniel Felix Kalbermatten
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva University, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
1 shared publication - Dirk Johannes Schaefer
Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, CH-4058 Basel, Switzerland
1 shared publication - Jörg Halter
Department of Hematology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
1 shared publication - Martin Haug
Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic, and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
1 shared publication - Michael Baumberger
Schweizer Paraplegiker-Zentrum Nottwil
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 29 January 2014
- Published by Springer Nature in Stem Cell Research & Therapy
- Vol. 5 (1) , 18
Progenitor cell therapy for sacral pressure sore: a pilot study with a novel human chronic wound model
Introduction: Chronic wounds are a major health-care issue, but research is limited by the complexity and heterogeneity in terms of wound etiology as well as patient-related factors. A suitable animal model that replicates the situation in humans is not available. Therefore, the aim of the present work is to present a standardized human wound model and the data of a pilot study of topically applied progenitor cells in a sacral pressure sore. Methods: Three patients underwent cell harvest from the iliac crest at the time of the initial debridement. Forty-eight hours after bone marrow harvest and debridement, the CD34+ selected cell suspension was injected into the wound. With the aid of a laser scanner, three-dimensional analyses of wound morphometry were performed until the defect was reconstructed with a local flap 3 weeks after debridement. Results: Decreases in volume to 60% ± 6% of baseline on the sham side and to 52% ± 3% of baseline on the cell side were measured. Histologic work-up revealed no signs of metaplastic, dysplastic, or neoplastic proliferation/differentiation after progenitor cell treatment. CD34+ cells were detected in the biopsies of day 0. Conclusions: The pressure sore wound model allows investigation of the initial 3 weeks after cell-based therapy. Objective outcome analysis in terms of wound volume and histology can be performed without, or with, minimal additional morbidity, and the anatomy of the sacral area allows a control and study side in the same patient. Therefore, this model can serve as a standard for wound-healing studies. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00535548.
- 29 January 2014
- Published by Springer Nature in Stem Cell Research & Therapy
- Vol. 5 (1) , 18
Open AccessProgenitor cell therapy for sacral pressure sore: a pilot study with a novel human chronic wound model
Introduction: Chronic wounds are a major health-care issue, but research is limited by the complexity and heterogeneity in terms of wound etiology as well as patient-related factors. A suitable animal model that replicates the situation in humans is not available. Therefore, the aim of the present work is to present a standardized human wound model and the data of a pilot study of topically applied progenitor cells in a sacral pressure sore. Methods: Three patients underwent cell harvest from the iliac crest at the time of the initial debridement. Forty-eight hours after bone marrow harvest and debridement, the CD34+ selected cell suspension was injected into the wound. With the aid of a laser scanner, three-dimensional analyses of wound morphometry were performed until the defect was reconstructed with a local flap 3 weeks after debridement. Results: Decreases in volume to 60% ± 6% of baseline on the sham side and to 52% ± 3% of baseline on the cell side were measured. Histologic work-up revealed no signs of metaplastic, dysplastic, or neoplastic proliferation/differentiation after progenitor cell treatment. CD34+ cells were detected in the biopsies of day 0. Conclusions: The pressure sore wound model allows investigation of the initial 3 weeks after cell-based therapy. Objective outcome analysis in terms of wound volume and histology can be performed without, or with, minimal additional morbidity, and the anatomy of the sacral area allows a control and study side in the same patient. Therefore, this model can serve as a standard for wound-healing studies. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00535548.