Cassendra M. Bergstrom
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Cassendra M. Bergstrom has a total of 19 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Kevin J. Pugh
School of Psychological Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO 80639, USA
5 shared publications Michael M. Phillips
School of Psychological Sciences, University of Northern Colorado
2 shared publicationsBenjamin C. Heddy
Department of Educational Psychology, Oklahoma University, Norman, OK, USA
1 shared publication- Benjamin C. Heddy
University of Oklahoma, Norman, USA
1 shared publication Bryden Spencer
School of Psychological Sciences University of Northern Colorado Greeley CO 80639 USA
1 shared publication- Colton Olson
School of Psychological Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO 80639, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 15 October 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1381-1416
Transformative Experience: A Critical Review and Investigation of Individual Factors
- 15 October 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1381-1416
Transformative Experience: A Critical Review and Investigation of Individual Factors
- Open Access
- 21 May 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Education Sciences
- Vol. 13 (5) , 526
Perceived Connection to Instructor and Instructor Passion as Predictors of Transformative Experiences in Science
Transformative experience represents a deep-engagement construct and refers to experiences in which students use science content to see and experience the world in meaningful new ways outside the classroom. Such experiences are associated with deep learning (e.g., transfer) and engagement (e.g., academic and career choice) outcomes. However, research on individual factors predictive of transformative experience is limited. The current study investigated university geoscience students’ perceptions of a connection to their instructor(s) and perceptions of their instructors’ passion for the content as predictors of transformative experience. Controlling for students’ initial interest and self-efficacy in the domain, we found both these factors to be predictive of transformative experience. These results suggest science teachers may be able to support engagement in transformative experiences by connecting with students and expressing a passion for the content.
- 21 May 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Education Sciences
- Vol. 13 (5) , 526
Open AccessPerceived Connection to Instructor and Instructor Passion as Predictors of Transformative Experiences in Science
Transformative experience represents a deep-engagement construct and refers to experiences in which students use science content to see and experience the world in meaningful new ways outside the classroom. Such experiences are associated with deep learning (e.g., transfer) and engagement (e.g., academic and career choice) outcomes. However, research on individual factors predictive of transformative experience is limited. The current study investigated university geoscience students’ perceptions of a connection to their instructor(s) and perceptions of their instructors’ passion for the content as predictors of transformative experience. Controlling for students’ initial interest and self-efficacy in the domain, we found both these factors to be predictive of transformative experience. These results suggest science teachers may be able to support engagement in transformative experiences by connecting with students and expressing a passion for the content.
- 26 April 2019
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Geoscience Education
- Vol. 67 (3) , 266-284
A quantitative investigation of geoscience departmental factors associated with the recruitment and retention of female students
Women are underrepresented in many undergraduate geoscience programs. Some departments are more successful at recruiting and retaining female students than others. To understand why, we investigated potential differences between more and less successful geoscience departments in terms of social support, institutional supports, institutional barriers, perceived connection to instructors, and transformative experiences. We collected data from 2,041 undergraduate geoscience students enrolled in six geoscience departments at public, four-year institutions across the United States. We recruited two departments that were successful at graduating a high percentage of female students compared to the national average (high-success sites), two departments with a moderate percentage (medium-success sites), and two with a low percentage (low-success sites). Students at high-success sites reported greater institutional supports, greater perceived connection to instructors, and lower institutional barriers than did students at medium- and low-success sites. Nonmajors at high-success sites reported higher levels of transformative experience than nonmajors at low-success sites. No significant differences were found between medium- and low-success sites. Across all sites, female students perceived less of a connection to their instructors and endorsed a lower level of transformative experience than did male students. We did not find gender differences in terms of the other factors. We also did not find gender by site interactions, suggesting that the success of high-success sites in recruiting and retaining women was associated with supporting all students. These results suggest departments can increase effectiveness in recruiting and retaining female student by increasing institutional supports, reducing institutional barriers, connecting with students, and fostering transformative experiences.
- 26 April 2019
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Geoscience Education
- Vol. 67 (3) , 266-284
A quantitative investigation of geoscience departmental factors associated with the recruitment and retention of female students
Women are underrepresented in many undergraduate geoscience programs. Some departments are more successful at recruiting and retaining female students than others. To understand why, we investigated potential differences between more and less successful geoscience departments in terms of social support, institutional supports, institutional barriers, perceived connection to instructors, and transformative experiences. We collected data from 2,041 undergraduate geoscience students enrolled in six geoscience departments at public, four-year institutions across the United States. We recruited two departments that were successful at graduating a high percentage of female students compared to the national average (high-success sites), two departments with a moderate percentage (medium-success sites), and two with a low percentage (low-success sites). Students at high-success sites reported greater institutional supports, greater perceived connection to instructors, and lower institutional barriers than did students at medium- and low-success sites. Nonmajors at high-success sites reported higher levels of transformative experience than nonmajors at low-success sites. No significant differences were found between medium- and low-success sites. Across all sites, female students perceived less of a connection to their instructors and endorsed a lower level of transformative experience than did male students. We did not find gender differences in terms of the other factors. We also did not find gender by site interactions, suggesting that the success of high-success sites in recruiting and retaining women was associated with supporting all students. These results suggest departments can increase effectiveness in recruiting and retaining female student by increasing institutional supports, reducing institutional barriers, connecting with students, and fostering transformative experiences.
- 8 March 2017
- Published by Wiley in Science Education
- Vol. 101 (3) , 369-398
Profiles of Transformative Engagement: Identification, Description, and Relation to Learning and Instruction
Transformative experience refers to learning episodes in which students use ideas from the science classroom to see and experience the world differently in their everyday lives. The construct is defined by three characteristics: (1) motivated use (application of learning in “free‐choice” contexts), (2) expansion of perception (seeing objects, events, or issues through the lens of the content), and (3) experiential value (valuing content for how it enriches everyday experience). To enhance conceptions of engagement in science, the current study sought to identify and describe profiles oftransformativeengagement by investigating levels and combinations of the three characteristics of transformative experience. In addition, it examined how learning and instruction relate to these profiles. Sixty‐five middle school science students were interviewed and responses were coded for the three characteristics of transformative experience. Scores on these characteristics were used as variables in cluster analysis and representative clusters were identified. Profiles of transformative engagement were developed and described based on these clusters. Profiles representing greater transformative engagement were associated with greater learning. Relative to a comparison condition, instruction designed to foster transformative experience yielded a higher percentage of students in the profile reflecting engagement in a genuine transformative experience.
- 8 March 2017
- Published by Wiley in Science Education
- Vol. 101 (3) , 369-398
Profiles of Transformative Engagement: Identification, Description, and Relation to Learning and Instruction
Transformative experience refers to learning episodes in which students use ideas from the science classroom to see and experience the world differently in their everyday lives. The construct is defined by three characteristics: (1) motivated use (application of learning in “free‐choice” contexts), (2) expansion of perception (seeing objects, events, or issues through the lens of the content), and (3) experiential value (valuing content for how it enriches everyday experience). To enhance conceptions of engagement in science, the current study sought to identify and describe profiles oftransformativeengagement by investigating levels and combinations of the three characteristics of transformative experience. In addition, it examined how learning and instruction relate to these profiles. Sixty‐five middle school science students were interviewed and responses were coded for the three characteristics of transformative experience. Scores on these characteristics were used as variables in cluster analysis and representative clusters were identified. Profiles of transformative engagement were developed and described based on these clusters. Profiles representing greater transformative engagement were associated with greater learning. Relative to a comparison condition, instruction designed to foster transformative experience yielded a higher percentage of students in the profile reflecting engagement in a genuine transformative experience.
- 8 December 2016
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Experimental Education
- Vol. 85 (4) , 629-657
Supporting Deep Engagement: The Teaching for Transformative Experiences in Science (TTES) Model
The Teaching for Transformative Experiences in Science (TTES) model was designed to facilitate the application of academic learning in students' everyday experiences. In the current study, we describe a 2-year design-based intervention that aimed to further develop and evaluate the TTES model. In the first year, a teacher implemented the TTES model in two of his four classes. The findings indicated enhanced engagement and learning, but primarily among students with higher prior engagement and learning. Insights led to revision of the TTES model. In the second year, the revised TTES model was implemented in all the teacher's classes, with another teacher's classes used for comparison. Intervention students demonstrated significantly greater learning and reported significantly higher levels of transformative experience than the comparison students.
- 8 December 2016
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Experimental Education
- Vol. 85 (4) , 629-657
Supporting Deep Engagement: The Teaching for Transformative Experiences in Science (TTES) Model
The Teaching for Transformative Experiences in Science (TTES) model was designed to facilitate the application of academic learning in students' everyday experiences. In the current study, we describe a 2-year design-based intervention that aimed to further develop and evaluate the TTES model. In the first year, a teacher implemented the TTES model in two of his four classes. The findings indicated enhanced engagement and learning, but primarily among students with higher prior engagement and learning. Insights led to revision of the TTES model. In the second year, the revised TTES model was implemented in all the teacher's classes, with another teacher's classes used for comparison. Intervention students demonstrated significantly greater learning and reported significantly higher levels of transformative experience than the comparison students.
- 17 December 2015
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Experimental Education
- Vol. 84 (4) , 764-786
Effects of Problem-Based Learning on Recognition Learning and Transfer Accounting for GPA and Goal Orientation
Conflicting research results have stirred controversy over the effectiveness of problem-based learning (PBL) compared to direct instruction at fostering content learning, particularly for novices. We addressed this by investigating effectiveness with respect to recognition learning and transfer and conducting an aptitude-treatment interaction analysis. We also examined how students' goal orientations may moderate learning in PBL and lecture/discussion environments. Participants included 197 preservice teachers in an undergraduate educational psychology course. Controlling for GPA, students in the PBL condition performed significantly better than students in the lecture/discussion condition on a transfer measure (p <.001, partial η2 =.271) and equally on a recognition learning measure (p =.530). We also found an aptitude-treatment interaction for recognition learning (p =.012, partial η2 =.034) but not transfer (p =.088). Results of goal orientation on learning outcomes were inconclusive.
- 17 December 2015
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Experimental Education
- Vol. 84 (4) , 764-786
Effects of Problem-Based Learning on Recognition Learning and Transfer Accounting for GPA and Goal Orientation
Conflicting research results have stirred controversy over the effectiveness of problem-based learning (PBL) compared to direct instruction at fostering content learning, particularly for novices. We addressed this by investigating effectiveness with respect to recognition learning and transfer and conducting an aptitude-treatment interaction analysis. We also examined how students' goal orientations may moderate learning in PBL and lecture/discussion environments. Participants included 197 preservice teachers in an undergraduate educational psychology course. Controlling for GPA, students in the PBL condition performed significantly better than students in the lecture/discussion condition on a transfer measure (p <.001, partial η2 =.271) and equally on a recognition learning measure (p =.530). We also found an aptitude-treatment interaction for recognition learning (p =.012, partial η2 =.034) but not transfer (p =.088). Results of goal orientation on learning outcomes were inconclusive.