Koji Oishi
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Koji Oishi has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Kazunori Nakajima
Department of Anatomy, Keio University School of Medicine
2 shared publications Michihiko Aramaki
Department of Anatomy, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
2 shared publicationsKashiko Tachikawa
Department of Anatomy, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
1 shared publicationNao Nakagawa
Division of Visual Information Processing, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, National Institutes for Natural Sciences, Okazaki, Japan
1 shared publication- Nobuhiko Yamamoto
Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan; Institute of Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518132, China
1 shared publication Shinji Hirano
Department of Cell Biology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 7 March 2016
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 113 (12) , 3371-3376
Mutually repressive interaction between Brn1/2 and Rorb contributes to the establishment of neocortical layer 2/3 and layer 4
Although several molecules have been shown to play important roles in subtype specification of neocortical neurons, the entire mechanism involved in the specification, in particular, of upper cortical plate (UCP) neurons still remains unclear. The UCP, which is responsible for intracortical connections in the neocortex, comprises histologically, functionally, and molecularly different layer 2/3 (L2/3) and L4. Here, we report the essential interactions between two types of transcription factors, Rorb (RAR-related orphan receptor beta) and Brn1/2 (Brain-1/Brain-2), for UCP specification. We found that Brn2 expression was detected in all upper layers in the immature UCP, but was subsequently restricted to L2/3, accompanied by up-regulation of Rorb in L4, suggesting demarcation of L2/3 and L4 during cortical maturation. Rorb indeed inhibited Brn2 expression and the expression of other L2/3 characteristics, revealed by ectopic expression and knockdown studies. Moreover, this inhibition occurred through direct binding of Rorb to the Brn2 locus. Conversely, Brn1/2 also inhibited Rorb expression and the expression of several L4 characteristics. Together, these results suggest that a mutually repressive mechanism exists between Brn1/2 and Rorb expression and that the established expression of Brn1/2 and Rorb further specifies those neurons into L2/3 and L4, respectively, during UCP maturation.
- 7 March 2016
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 113 (12) , 3371-3376
Mutually repressive interaction between Brn1/2 and Rorb contributes to the establishment of neocortical layer 2/3 and layer 4
Although several molecules have been shown to play important roles in subtype specification of neocortical neurons, the entire mechanism involved in the specification, in particular, of upper cortical plate (UCP) neurons still remains unclear. The UCP, which is responsible for intracortical connections in the neocortex, comprises histologically, functionally, and molecularly different layer 2/3 (L2/3) and L4. Here, we report the essential interactions between two types of transcription factors, Rorb (RAR-related orphan receptor beta) and Brn1/2 (Brain-1/Brain-2), for UCP specification. We found that Brn2 expression was detected in all upper layers in the immature UCP, but was subsequently restricted to L2/3, accompanied by up-regulation of Rorb in L4, suggesting demarcation of L2/3 and L4 during cortical maturation. Rorb indeed inhibited Brn2 expression and the expression of other L2/3 characteristics, revealed by ectopic expression and knockdown studies. Moreover, this inhibition occurred through direct binding of Rorb to the Brn2 locus. Conversely, Brn1/2 also inhibited Rorb expression and the expression of several L4 characteristics. Together, these results suggest that a mutually repressive mechanism exists between Brn1/2 and Rorb expression and that the established expression of Brn1/2 and Rorb further specifies those neurons into L2/3 and L4, respectively, during UCP maturation.
- Open Access
- 12 February 2016
- Published by eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd in eLife
- Vol. 5
Identity of neocortical layer 4 neurons is specified through correct positioning into the cortex
Many cell-intrinsic mechanisms have been shown to regulate neuronal subtype specification in the mammalian neocortex. However, how much cell environment is crucial for subtype determination still remained unclear. Here, we show that knockdown of Protocadherin20 (Pcdh20), which is expressed in post-migratory neurons of layer 4 (L4) lineage, caused the cells to localize in L2/3. The ectopically positioned “future L4 neurons” lost their L4 characteristics but acquired L2/3 characteristics. Knockdown of a cytoskeletal protein in the future L4 neurons, which caused random disruption of positioning, also showed that those accidentally located in L4 acquired the L4 characteristics. Moreover, restoration of positioning of the Pcdh20-knockdown neurons into L4 rescued the specification failure. We further suggest that the thalamocortical axons provide a positional cue to specify L4 identity. These results suggest that the L4 identity is not completely determined at the time of birth but ensured by the surrounding environment after appropriate positioning.
- 12 February 2016
- Published by eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd in eLife
- Vol. 5
Open AccessIdentity of neocortical layer 4 neurons is specified through correct positioning into the cortex
Many cell-intrinsic mechanisms have been shown to regulate neuronal subtype specification in the mammalian neocortex. However, how much cell environment is crucial for subtype determination still remained unclear. Here, we show that knockdown of Protocadherin20 (Pcdh20), which is expressed in post-migratory neurons of layer 4 (L4) lineage, caused the cells to localize in L2/3. The ectopically positioned “future L4 neurons” lost their L4 characteristics but acquired L2/3 characteristics. Knockdown of a cytoskeletal protein in the future L4 neurons, which caused random disruption of positioning, also showed that those accidentally located in L4 acquired the L4 characteristics. Moreover, restoration of positioning of the Pcdh20-knockdown neurons into L4 rescued the specification failure. We further suggest that the thalamocortical axons provide a positional cue to specify L4 identity. These results suggest that the L4 identity is not completely determined at the time of birth but ensured by the surrounding environment after appropriate positioning.