Hande Barlın

The urban heat island (UHI) effect has become a persistent climate-related challenge affecting sustainable urban development, with consequences for public health, thermal comfort, energy demand, and climate adaptation. Numerous studies have investigated UHI using diverse observational, modeling, and analytical approaches. However, existing approaches remain fragmented and lack standardized integrated assessment frameworks. This study aims to synthesize the contemporary methodologies in UHI assessment and provide an integrated framework that supports sustainable urban heat mitigation and decision-making. A PRISMA-inspired systematic review was conducted using Web of Science (WoS) and considered peer-reviewed English-language articles published between 2016 and 2026. In line with the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, studies were screened and classified into several methodological domains: urban characterization, microclimate monitoring, urban environmental indicators, spatial analysis, statistical modeling, cooling interventions, and sustainable assessment. Based on the synthesized evidence, a proposed integrated methodological framework was developed, providing a comprehensive foundation for researchers, urban planners, and decision-makers to design standardized UHI studies and support climate-resilient and sustainable urban development.

The simultaneous ageing of the workforce and rapid digitalisation of work processes present both opportunities and risks for the physical health of workers aged 50 and above. Digital tools and health programmes can support work ability, inclusion, and disease prevention, yet may also exacerbate visual strain, cardiovascular health risks, musculoskeletal disorders, and other chronic conditions through prolonged screen time, poor ergonomics, and sedentary behaviours—particularly in telework. Low digital literacy can intensify these challenges, while regular internet use and targeted digital health interventions show protective effects. Workplace noise, including from headsets, further impacts hearing, stress, and productivity, with older workers more vulnerable due to sensory decline. Mitigation requires ergonomic adaptations, promotion of active work habits, digital upskilling, and inclusive technology design. Leadership and policy should ensure accessible tools, lifelong learning opportunities, and equitable health resources, enabling older employees to remain healthy, productive, and engaged in increasingly digitalised work environments.

Introduction: The rapid digitalisation of workplaces presents both challenges and opportunities for older workers. This scoping review examines how digital technologies impact social support for older workers, focusing on emotional, informational, and instrumental support within professional environments. While social support is critical for well-being and productivity in ageing workforces, the effects of digitalisation on social support dynamics remain insufficiently understood. Methods: Following Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a comprehensive search strategy was conducted across databases like ERIH, Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed from anytime to 2023 to identify peer-reviewed studies involving digital technologies used by older workers, generally considered as workers aged 50 years or older. Covidence software facilitated the screening of over 5000 scientific papers, study selection, and data extraction, and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) assessed quality. Findings were synthesized through descriptive statistics and narrative analysis. Results: Forty-three studies met inclusion criteria. Digital technologies were found to enhance various forms of social support: remote work tools, messaging apps, and telemedicine platforms facilitated emotional connection and informational exchange. However, digitalisation also introduced barriers, some older workers reported isolation, reduced informal contact, and technostress, underscoring disparities in digital literacy and adaptation. Discussion: Digitalisation exerts a dual impact on social support for older workers: it can strengthen professional connectedness yet also heighten vulnerability to stress and exclusion. Targeted digital literacy initiatives and sustained managerial engagement are crucial to ensure that technology enhances, rather than undermines, well-being and productivity among ageing employees.

Background: Digital technologies are increasingly present in workplaces; however, their impact on the physical health of older workers remains unclear. Objective: This scoping review aims to examine and summarize the scientific evidence on how digital technology affects the physical health of older workers. Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines, we conducted a scoping review of English-language peer-reviewed studies extracted from MEDLINE, Cochrane, ProQuest, Web of Science, Scopus, APA PsycInfo, and ERIH PLUS. The review followed the population, concept, and context (PCC) framework, including studies on workers aged 50 years or older, any form of digital technology (eg, teleworking and the use of digital tools at work), and its impact on physical health (eg, vision loss and musculoskeletal disorders). Studies that focused only on mental health were excluded. A 13-member research team screened studies in 3 stages, namely title and abstract screening, full-text review, and data extraction. Each study was independently reviewed by at least 2 researchers, and disagreements were resolved through discussion. Data extraction and synthesis were conducted using the web-based systematic review platform Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation Ltd). Results: In total, 18 studies were selected, published between 2012 and 2024, with most conducted in Europe (n=8) and Asia (n=6), followed by North America (n=2), Oceania (n=1), and Africa (n=1). We identified 6 key physical health areas impacted by digital technology in older workers, including eye health, musculoskeletal health, metabolic and cardiovascular health, workplace sound levels, and user experiences of new technologies. Findings showed mixed effects, with notable negative impacts on eye strain, musculoskeletal disorders, and hearing health issues, but positive effects on weight management, cardiovascular health, physical activity, and perceived physical well-being. Conclusions: Digital technology presents both risks and benefits for the physical health of older workers. While prolonged screen use and digital work environments contribute to eye strain, musculoskeletal issues, and hearing concerns, other technologies support better weight management, cardiovascular health, and increased physical activity. These findings also underscore the need for workplace intervention to reduce health risks. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/59900

BACKGROUND Digital technologies are increasingly present in workplaces; however, their impact on the physical health of older workers remains unclear. OBJECTIVE This scoping review aims to examine and summarize the scientific evidence on how digital technology affects the physical health of older workers. METHODS Following PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines, we conducted a scoping review of English-language peer-reviewed studies extracted from MEDLINE, Cochrane, ProQuest, Web of Science, Scopus, APA PsycInfo, and ERIH PLUS. The review followed the population, concept, and context (PCC) framework, including studies on workers aged 50 years or older, any form of digital technology (eg, teleworking and the use of digital tools at work), and its impact on physical health (eg, vision loss and musculoskeletal disorders). Studies that focused only on mental health were excluded. A 13-member research team screened studies in 3 stages, namely title and abstract screening, full-text review, and data extraction. Each study was independently reviewed by at least 2 researchers, and disagreements were resolved through discussion. Data extraction and synthesis were conducted using the web-based systematic review platform Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation Ltd). RESULTS In total, 18 studies were selected, published between 2012 and 2024, with most conducted in Europe (n=8) and Asia (n=6), followed by North America (n=2), Oceania (n=1), and Africa (n=1). We identified 6 key physical health areas impacted by digital technology in older workers, including eye health, musculoskeletal health, metabolic and cardiovascular health, workplace sound levels, and user experiences of new technologies. Findings showed mixed effects, with notable negative impacts on eye strain, musculoskeletal disorders, and hearing health issues, but positive effects on weight management, cardiovascular health, physical activity, and perceived physical well-being. CONCLUSIONS Digital technology presents both risks and benefits for the physical health of older workers. While prolonged screen use and digital work environments contribute to eye strain, musculoskeletal issues, and hearing concerns, other technologies support better weight management, cardiovascular health, and increased physical activity. These findings also underscore the need for workplace intervention to reduce health risks. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR2-10.2196/59900

Background: as part of the larger European WELLBASED project an urban program focusing on transitions in heating to tackle energy poverty, is implemented in 4 disadvantaged, predominantly Roma neighborhoods of Edirne, Türkiye. These neighborhoods have high levels of vulnerability, aid dependency, and energy poverty. This study investigated the impact on perceived wellbeing of implementing the heating system transition. Methods: A qualitative methodology was applied; data was collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews among participants in the intervention group of the larger WELLBASED evaluation study. Diversity was ensured regarding gender, age, education level, and working status. Participants were 13 individuals from 13 households in which energy-efficient heating systems were installed. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcript verbatim and coded; thematic analysis was conducted. Results: 3 main themes and 7 sub-themes (st) emerged in the preliminary analysis with regard to impact on well-being: perceived changes in living conditions (st: physical changes, financial implications, domestic burden), perceived effects on health (st. mental health, physical health), and expectations versus reality (st. insulation, efficiency). Experiences differed as per housing condition, type of energy used, usage proficiency, and income level. Conclusions: Energy efficient heating system transition to tackle energy poverty at homes may not be sufficient to realize impact on perceived wellbeing. Housing conditions (ie. insulation), supported energy sources and management of expectations need to be considered as part of the program.

Background: Digital technologies have penetrated most workplaces. However, it is unclear how such digital technologies affect the physical health of older workers. Objective: This scoping review aims to examine and summarize the evidence from scientific literature concerning the impact of digital technology on the physical health of older workers. Methods: This scoping review will be conducted following recommendations outlined by Levac et al and will adhere to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines for reporting. Peer-reviewed papers written in English will be searched in the following databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane, ProQuest, Web of Science, Scopus, APA PsycInfo, and ERIH PLUS. The web-based systematic review platform Covidence will be used to create a data extraction template. It will cover the following items: study and participant characteristics, health measures, digital tool characteristics and usage, and research findings. Following the Population, Concept, and Context (PCC) framework, our review will focus on studies involving older workers aged 50 years or older, any form of digital technology (including teleworking and the use of digital tools at work), and how digital technologies affect physical health (such as vision loss, musculoskeletal disorders, and migraines). Studies that focus only on mental health will be excluded. Study selection based on title and abstract screening (first stage), full-text review (second stage), and data extraction (third stage) will be performed by a group of researchers, whereby each paper will be reviewed by at least 2 people. Any conflict regarding the inclusion or exclusion of a study and the data extraction will be resolved by discussion between the researchers who evaluated the papers; a third researcher will be involved if consensus is not reached. Results: A preliminary search of MEDLINE, Epistemonikos, Cochrane, PROSPERO, and JBI Evidence Synthesis was conducted, and no current or ongoing systematic reviews or scoping reviews on the topic were identified. The results of the study are expected in April 2025. Conclusions: Our scoping review will seek to provide an overview of the available evidence and identify research gaps regarding the effect of digital technology and the use of digital tools in the work environment on the physical health of older workers. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/59900

BACKGROUND Digital technologies have penetrated most workplaces. However, it is unclear how such digital technologies affect the physical health of older workers. OBJECTIVE This scoping review aims to examine and summarize the evidence from scientific literature concerning the impact of digital technology on the physical health of older workers. METHODS This scoping review will be conducted following recommendations outlined by Levac et al and will adhere to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines for reporting. Peer-reviewed papers written in English will be searched in the following databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane, ProQuest, Web of Science, Scopus, APA PsycInfo, and ERIH PLUS. The web-based systematic review platform Covidence will be used to create a data extraction template. It will cover the following items: study and participant characteristics, health measures, digital tool characteristics and usage, and research findings. Following the Population, Concept, and Context (PCC) framework, our review will focus on studies involving older workers aged 50 years or older, any form of digital technology (including teleworking and the use of digital tools at work), and how digital technologies affect physical health (such as vision loss, musculoskeletal disorders, and migraines). Studies that focus only on mental health will be excluded. Study selection based on title and abstract screening (first stage), full-text review (second stage), and data extraction (third stage) will be performed by a group of researchers, whereby each paper will be reviewed by at least 2 people. Any conflict regarding the inclusion or exclusion of a study and the data extraction will be resolved by discussion between the researchers who evaluated the papers; a third researcher will be involved if consensus is not reached. RESULTS A preliminary search of MEDLINE, Epistemonikos, Cochrane, PROSPERO, and JBI Evidence Synthesis was conducted, and no current or ongoing systematic reviews or scoping reviews on the topic were identified. The results of the study are expected in April 2025. CONCLUSIONS Our scoping review will seek to provide an overview of the available evidence and identify research gaps regarding the effect of digital technology and the use of digital tools in the work environment on the physical health of older workers. CLINICALTRIAL INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT PRR1-10.2196/59900

Suriye İç Savaşının 2011 yılında başlamasından sonra Suriyeliler Türkiye’ye yoğun bir şekilde göç etmişlerdir. Suriyelilerin göç hareketinin ev sahibi ülkeler üzerindeki etkileri akademik yazında yoğun olarak incelenen konular arasındadır. Bahse konu niceliksel yöntem kullanan çalışmaların önemli bir kısmı Suriyeli göçünün ekonomik etkilerine odaklanmaktadır. Suriyelilerin göçünün evlilik ve boşanma üzerindeki etkisi, niceliksel yöntemler kullanılarak şimdiye kadar hiç incelenmemiştir. Literatürdeki bu açığı kapatmak amacıyla çalışmada 2008-2020 yılları arasında Türkiye’deki illerde Suriyeli sayısındaki değişimlerin, Türkiye’deki evlilik ve boşanmalar üzerindeki etkilerini incelenmektir. Analiz için akademik yazında nedenselliği ölçmeye yönelik sıklıkla tercih edilen Farkların Farkı yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonuçları, 25-29 ve 30-34 yaşlarındaki yerli erkeklerin yanı sıra 20-24, 25-29, 40-44 ve 45-49 yaşlarındaki yerli kadınların evlilik oranlarının Suriyeli akınından etkilendiğini ortaya koymaktadır. 20-24 yaş arası yerli kadınların ve 25-29 yaş arası yerli erkeklerin, diğer gruplardaki yaşıtlarına göre daha fazla etkilendikleri görülmektedir. Ayrıca, 20-24 ve 60 ve üstü yaş gruplarındaki erkeklerin evlenme hızında düşüş olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Öte yandan, Suriyeli akınının Türkiye’de hem erkeklerde hem de kadınlarda 25-29 ve 30-34 yaş grupları arasında; erkeklerde 35-39 ve kadınlarda 20-24 yaş arasındaki bireylerin boşanma oranlarını artırdığı bulunmuştur.

This study investigates the impact of the massive and unexpected influx of Syrian refugees on the job vacancy rates (JVRs) and job-finding rates (JFRs) in Turkey between 2009–2015 and 2009–2018. We employed the instrumental variable approach to address potential endogeneity issues. While we found no significant causal impact of the Syrian refugees on JVR, they decreased JFR between 2009 and 2018. A reduction in JFR indicates that the Beveridge Curve shifted inwards, thereby raising matching efficiency and facilitating an improvement in labour market conditions. Furthermore, our research indicated differences in coefficients and significance in JVR and JFR across occupations, as well as different effects in these areas between the short and long term. However, the results demonstrate that the rapid and unexpected influx of Syrian refugees alleviated JVR and JFR in most of the occupation groups.