Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Vaidyanath Ramakrishnan has a total of 12 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Designing the next generation of polymers with machine learning and physics-based models

    by Alex K Chew, Mohammad Atif Faiz Afzal, Anand Chandrasekaran, Jan Henk Kamps, Vaidya Ramakrishnan

    The development of next-generation polymers necessitates optimizing several key properties simultaneously, a task that is expensive and infeasible using traditional trial-and-error experimental approaches. A promising alternative is employing a combination of machine learning and physics-based tools to rapidly screen the polymer design space and provide suggestions of new polymers that meet the critical properties required for industrial applications. In this study, we introduce a comprehensive workflow that utilizes machine learning and molecular modeling approaches to design new polymers with the focus on improving five polymer properties: (1) glass transition temperature, (2) dielectric constant, (3) refractive index, (4) stress optic coefficient, and (5) linear coefficient of thermal expansion. Using a small dataset ( < 200 unique polymers), we developed quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPRs) models to accurately predict the experimental polymer properties for both homo- and co-polymer systems. We tested several ML algorithms and identified the best models for predicting these polymer properties, achieving test set R 2 greater than 0.77 across all properties. We then explored new polymers by creating a library of over ∼10 000 homopolymers using R-group enumeration tools and applied the trained QSPR models to rapidly predict the five polymer properties. The predictions of QSPR models were used to create a multi-parameter optimization score, which helped downselect the large polymer space to ∼10 promising candidates. The properties of these selected polymer candidates were subsequently validated with classical molecular dynamics simulations and density functional theory, revealing a strong correlation with the QSPR model predictions. Finally, one of the top candidates was validated by experiments, which showed good agreement against QSPR and physics-based models. Our workflow underscores the power of combining data-driven and theoretical methods in the polymer design process given a small dataset size, offering a valuable resource for experimentalists looking to leverage computer-aided strategies in materials innovation.


  • Experimental investigation of anomalous molecular probe diffusion in entangled polymer melts

    by D. Nieto Simavilla, V. Ramakrishnan, S. K. Smoukov, D. C. Venerus

    Diffusion coefficientD, scaled using the Stokes–Einstein relation, for the dye AB540 in several polymer meltsversusratio of polymer relaxation timeτpto characteristic diffusion timeτD. Inset shows schematic of a particle with radiusRin a polymer melt with tube diametera.


  • Open Access

    Anomalous Terminal Shear Viscosity Behavior of Polycarbonate Nanocomposites Containing Grafted Nanosilica Particles

    by Vaidyanath Ramakrishnan, Johannes G. P. Goossens, Theodorus L. Hoeks, Gerrit W. M. Peters

    Viscosity controls an important issue in polymer processing. This paper reports on the terminal viscosity behavior of a polymer melt containing grafted nanosilica particles. The melt viscosity behavior of the nanocomposites was found to depend on the interaction between the polymer matrix and the nanoparticle surface. In the case of polycarbonate (PC) nanocomposites, the viscosity decreases by approximately 25% at concentrations below 0.7 vol% of nanosilica, followed by an increase at higher concentrations. Chemical analysis shows that the decrease in viscosity can be attributed to in situ grafting of PC on the nanosilica surface, leading to a lower entanglement density around the nanoparticle. The thickness of the graft layer was found to be of the order of the tube diameter, with the disentangled zone being approximately equal to the radius of gyration (Rg) polymer chain. Furthermore, it is shown that the grafting has an effect on the motion of the PC chains at all timescales. Finally, the viscosity behavior in the PC nanocomposites was found to be independent of the molar mass of PC. The PC data are compared with polystyrene nanocomposites, for which the interaction between the polymer and nanoparticles is absent. The results outlined in this paper can be utilized for applications with low shear processing conditions, e.g., rotomolding, 3D printing, and multilayer co-extrusion.


  • The effect of molecular structure on the secondary transitions and their influence on the decoloration kinetics of photochromic dyes in co‐polycarbonates

    by Fabrizio Micciche, Vaidyanath Ramakrishnan, Theodorus L. Hoeks

    Photochromic dyes have restricted use in rigid polycarbonates because of slow coloration and decoloration kinetics. In this study, it is shown that the decoloration kinetics of two photochromic dyes can be controlled by tuning the chain stiffness and free volume of the host matrix. The introduction of flexible moieties in rigid BPA‐based polycarbonate chain accelerates the decoloration of these dyes whereas a rigid co‐monomer delays the decoloration kinetics. Although Tg might be used as a parameter to improve photochromism in polymer matrices, dynamic mechanical analysis demonstrates that the decoloration kinetics of the dyes in host polymer matrices having similar Tg depends primarily on the secondary relaxations and, thus, on the polymer architecture. The effect of the co‐monomer type on the characteristic ratio is also discussed underlining the potential relationship between the free volume and chain stiffness. These results open the possibility to develop transparent or semitransparent photochromic materials based on tailor‐made co‐polycarbonates. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2016, 54, 1593–1601