Takeru Honda
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Takeru Honda has a total of 12 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Hidehiro Mizusawa
Department of Neurology and Neurological Science, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8510 Tokyo, Japan
2 shared publicationsTakanori Yokota
Department of Neurology and Neurological Science, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8510 Tokyo, Japan
2 shared publicationsYuji Hashimoto
Department of Neurology and Neurological Science, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8510 Tokyo, Japan
2 shared publicationsKazuhiko Katano
KATANO TOOL SOFTWARE, Ichikawa, Chiba, Japan
1 shared publicationKazumasa Soga
Department of Neurology and Neurological Science, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan
1 shared publicationKen Matsumura
Department of Neurology and Neurological Science, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 25 June 2018
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 115 (28) , 7428-7433
Tandem internal models execute motor learning in the cerebellum
Significance: The formation and dissolution of internal models of the human body occur in the cerebellum, and their logical organization is essential for normal motor learning. Here, we propose that the two known types of internal models, forward and inverse, are combined into one tandem model. We analyzed human motor learning, theoretically and experimentally, in a prism-adaptation hand-reaching task. Remarkably, the behavioral analyses and computational modeling converged to support the existence of a tandem model and reveal its unique features in cerebellum-based motor learning. For example, intentional misreaching induced covert learning in the tandem model. Finally, the tandem model was used to index the nature and degree of cerebellar damage in patients.
- 25 June 2018
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 115 (28) , 7428-7433
Open AccessTandem internal models execute motor learning in the cerebellum
Significance: The formation and dissolution of internal models of the human body occur in the cerebellum, and their logical organization is essential for normal motor learning. Here, we propose that the two known types of internal models, forward and inverse, are combined into one tandem model. We analyzed human motor learning, theoretically and experimentally, in a prism-adaptation hand-reaching task. Remarkably, the behavioral analyses and computational modeling converged to support the existence of a tandem model and reveal its unique features in cerebellum-based motor learning. For example, intentional misreaching induced covert learning in the tandem model. Finally, the tandem model was used to index the nature and degree of cerebellar damage in patients.
- Open Access
- 18 March 2015
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 10 (3) , e0119376
Quantitative Evaluation of Human Cerebellum-Dependent Motor Learning through Prism Adaptation of Hand-Reaching Movement
The cerebellum plays important roles in motor coordination and learning. However, motor learning has not been quantitatively evaluated clinically. It thus remains unclear how motor learning is influenced by cerebellar diseases or aging, and is related with incoordination. Here, we present a new application for testing human cerebellum-dependent motor learning using prism adaptation. In our paradigm, the participant wearing prism-equipped goggles touches their index finger to the target presented on a touchscreen in every trial. The whole test consisted of three consecutive sessions: (1) 50 trials with normal vision (BASELINE), (2) 100 trials wearing the prism that shifts the visual field 25° rightward (PRISM), and (3) 50 trials without the prism (REMOVAL). In healthy subjects, the prism-induced finger-touch error, i.e., the distance between touch and target positions, was decreased gradually by motor learning through repetition of trials. We found that such motor learning could be quantified using the “adaptability index (AI)”, which was calculated by multiplying each probability of [acquisition in the last 10 trials of PRISM], [retention in the initial five trials of REMOVAL], and [extinction in the last 10 trials of REMOVAL]. The AI of cerebellar patients less than 70 years old (mean, 0.227; n = 62) was lower than that of age-matched healthy subjects (0.867, n = 21; p < 0.0001). While AI did not correlate with the magnitude of dysmetria in ataxic patients, it declined in parallel with disease progression, suggesting a close correlation between the impaired cerebellar motor leaning and the dysmetria. Furthermore, AI decreased with aging in the healthy subjects over 70 years old compared with that in the healthy subjects less than 70 years old. We suggest that our paradigm of prism adaptation may allow us to quantitatively assess cerebellar motor learning in both normal and diseased conditions.
- 18 March 2015
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 10 (3) , e0119376
Open AccessQuantitative Evaluation of Human Cerebellum-Dependent Motor Learning through Prism Adaptation of Hand-Reaching Movement
The cerebellum plays important roles in motor coordination and learning. However, motor learning has not been quantitatively evaluated clinically. It thus remains unclear how motor learning is influenced by cerebellar diseases or aging, and is related with incoordination. Here, we present a new application for testing human cerebellum-dependent motor learning using prism adaptation. In our paradigm, the participant wearing prism-equipped goggles touches their index finger to the target presented on a touchscreen in every trial. The whole test consisted of three consecutive sessions: (1) 50 trials with normal vision (BASELINE), (2) 100 trials wearing the prism that shifts the visual field 25° rightward (PRISM), and (3) 50 trials without the prism (REMOVAL). In healthy subjects, the prism-induced finger-touch error, i.e., the distance between touch and target positions, was decreased gradually by motor learning through repetition of trials. We found that such motor learning could be quantified using the “adaptability index (AI)”, which was calculated by multiplying each probability of [acquisition in the last 10 trials of PRISM], [retention in the initial five trials of REMOVAL], and [extinction in the last 10 trials of REMOVAL]. The AI of cerebellar patients less than 70 years old (mean, 0.227; n = 62) was lower than that of age-matched healthy subjects (0.867, n = 21; p < 0.0001). While AI did not correlate with the magnitude of dysmetria in ataxic patients, it declined in parallel with disease progression, suggesting a close correlation between the impaired cerebellar motor leaning and the dysmetria. Furthermore, AI decreased with aging in the healthy subjects over 70 years old compared with that in the healthy subjects less than 70 years old. We suggest that our paradigm of prism adaptation may allow us to quantitatively assess cerebellar motor learning in both normal and diseased conditions.