Hao Long
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Hao Long has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Guo-Wei Ma
The Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
1 shared publication - Lanjun Zhang
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat‑sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P.R. China
1 shared publication - Qilong Ma
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, 651 Dongfengdong Road, 510060, Guangzhou, China.
1 shared publication - Tiehua Rong
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
1 shared publication - Wengao Liu
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, 651 Dongfengdong Road, 510060, Guangzhou, China.
1 shared publication - Yongbin Lin
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 18 September 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
- Vol. 10 (1) , 123
Right versus left transthoracic approach for lymph node-negative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
To compare the right and left transthoracic approach on the post-operative survival of patients with lymph node-negative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Six hundred and ninety-five ESCC patients who underwent esophagectomy between 1990 and 2005 were retrospectively enrolled in the present study and were confirmed by histology to be of no lymph node metastasis. Those who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy were excluded from the study. Patients were divided into two groups, the left (n = 545) and right (n = 150) transthoracic groups. The follow-up duration ranged from 1 to 20 years with a mean of 7 years. Kaplan–Meier and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards were used for analysis. 3- and 5-year CSS rates were 62.0 % and 44.0 % in the left group, while the corresponding figures in the right group were 56.0 % and 40.0 %(P < 0.05). The overall survival for the two groups was significantly different (P = 0.045). Survival analyses were stratified by stages, which found that the favorable survival advantage was not present. When the survival curves were stratified by tumor locations, a significant difference was not revealed. Surgical approaches were regarded as one of the prognostic factors in the univariate analysis (P = 0.019). However, this significance could not be confirmed in multivariate Cox regression analysis (P = 0.193). The left transthoracic approach is superior in some aspects to the right transthoracic approach regarding surgical and oncological outcomes in the treatment of lymph node negative ESCC.
- 18 September 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
- Vol. 10 (1) , 123
Open AccessRight versus left transthoracic approach for lymph node-negative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
To compare the right and left transthoracic approach on the post-operative survival of patients with lymph node-negative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Six hundred and ninety-five ESCC patients who underwent esophagectomy between 1990 and 2005 were retrospectively enrolled in the present study and were confirmed by histology to be of no lymph node metastasis. Those who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy were excluded from the study. Patients were divided into two groups, the left (n = 545) and right (n = 150) transthoracic groups. The follow-up duration ranged from 1 to 20 years with a mean of 7 years. Kaplan–Meier and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards were used for analysis. 3- and 5-year CSS rates were 62.0 % and 44.0 % in the left group, while the corresponding figures in the right group were 56.0 % and 40.0 %(P < 0.05). The overall survival for the two groups was significantly different (P = 0.045). Survival analyses were stratified by stages, which found that the favorable survival advantage was not present. When the survival curves were stratified by tumor locations, a significant difference was not revealed. Surgical approaches were regarded as one of the prognostic factors in the univariate analysis (P = 0.019). However, this significance could not be confirmed in multivariate Cox regression analysis (P = 0.193). The left transthoracic approach is superior in some aspects to the right transthoracic approach regarding surgical and oncological outcomes in the treatment of lymph node negative ESCC.