XCXin Chen

Xin Chen

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Xin Chen has a total of 42 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Methylomes in Vegans versus Pescatarians and Nonvegetarians

    by Valery Filippov, Karen Jaceldo-Siegl, Alexey Eroshkin, Vasiliy Loskutov, Xin Chen, Charles Wang, Penelope J. Duerksen-Hughes

    Epigenetic studies in animal models have demonstrated that diet affects gene regulation by altering methylation patterns. We interrogated methylomes in humans who have different sources of protein in their diet. We compared methylation of DNA isolated from buffy coat in 38 vegans, 41 pescatarians and 68 nonvegetarians. Methylation data were obtained using Infinium HumanMethylation450 arrays and analyzed using the Partek Genomic software. Differences in differentially methylated sites were small, though with the use of relaxed statistical tests we did identify diet-associated differences. To further test the validity of these observations, we performed separate and independent comparisons of the methylation differences between vegans and nonvegetarians, and between vegans and pescatarians. The detected differences were then examined to determine if they were enriched in specific pathways. Pathway analysis revealed enrichment of several specific processes, including homeobox transcription and glutamate transport. The detected differences in DNA methylation patterns between vegans, pescatarians, and nonvegetarians enabled us to identify 77 CpG sites that may be sensitive to diet and/or lifestyle, though high levels of individual-specific differences were also noted.


  • Open Access

    DNA Methylation Profiles of Vegans and Non-Vegetarians in the Adventist Health Study-2 Cohort

    by Fayth L. Miles, Andrew Mashchak, Valery Filippov, Michael J. Orlich, Penelope Duerksen-Hughes, Xin Chen, Charles Wang, Kimberly Siegmund, Gary E. Fraser

    We sought to determine if DNA methylation patterns differed between vegans and non-vegetarians in the Adventist Health Study-2 cohort. Genome-wide DNA methylation derived from buffy coat was profiled in 62 vegans and 142 non-vegetarians. Using linear regression, methylation of CpG sites and genes was categorized or summarized according to various genic/intergenic regions and CpG island-related regions, as well as the promoter. Methylation of genes was measured as the average methylation of available CpG’s annotated to the nominated region of the respective gene. A permutation method defining the null distribution adapted from Storey et al. was used to adjust for false discovery. Differences in methylation of several CpG sites and genes were detected at a false discovery rate < 0.05 in region-specific and overall analyses. A vegan diet was associated predominantly with hypomethylation of genes, most notably methyltransferase-like 1 (METTL1). Although a limited number of differentially methylated features were detected in the current study, the false discovery method revealed that a much larger proportion of differentially methylated genes and sites exist, and could be detected with a larger sample size. Our findings suggest modest differences in DNA methylation in vegans and non-vegetarians, with a much greater number of detectable significant differences expected with a larger sample.


  • Open Access

    A Comprehensive Multi-Center Cross-platform Benchmarking Study of Single-cell RNA Sequencing Using Reference Samples

    by Wangqiu Chen, Yongmei Zhao, Xin Chen, Xiaojiang Xu, Zhaowei Yang, Yingtao Bi, Vicky Chen, Jing Li, Hannah Choi, Ben Ernest, et al.

    Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has become a very powerful technology for biomedical research and is becoming much more affordable as methods continue to evolve, but it is unknown how reproducible different platforms are using different bioinformatics pipelines, particularly the recently developed scRNA-seq batch correction algorithms. We carried out a comprehensive multi-center cross-platform comparison on different scRNA-seq platforms using standard reference samples. We compared six pre-processing pipelines, seven bioinformatics normalization procedures, and seven batch effect correction methods including CCA, MNN, Scanorama, BBKNN, Harmony, limma and ComBat to evaluate the performance and reproducibility of 20 scRNA-seq data sets derived from four different platforms and centers. We benchmarked scRNA-seq performance across different platforms and testing sites using global gene expression profiles as well as some cell-type specific marker genes. We showed that there were large batch effects; and the reproducibility of scRNA-seq across platforms was dictated both by the expression level of genes selected and the batch correction methods used. We found that CCA, MNN, and BBKNN all corrected the batch variations fairly well for the scRNA-seq data derived from biologically similar samples across platforms/sites. However, for the scRNA-seq data derived from or consisting of biologically distinct samples, limma and ComBat failed to correct batch effects, whereas CCA over-corrected the batch effect and misclassified the cell types and samples. In contrast, MNN, Harmony and BBKNN separated biologically different samples/cell types into correspondingly distinct dimensional subspaces; however, consistent with this algorithm’s logic, MNN required that the samples evaluated each contain a shared portion of highly similar cells. In summary, we found a great cross-platform consistency in separating two distinct samples when an appropriate batch correction method was used. We hope this large cross-platform/site scRNA-seq data set will provide a valuable resource, and that our findings will offer useful advice for the single-cell sequencing community.

  • Open Access

    Hypermethylation of Synphilin-1, Alpha-Synuclein-Interacting Protein (SNCAIP) Gene in the Cerebral Cortex of Patients with Sporadic Parkinson’s Disease

    by Khashayar Dashtipour, Ali Tafreshi, Charles Adler, Thomas Beach, Xin Chen, Geidy Serrano, Stephanie Tashiro, Charles Wang

    Objective: To determine and compare DNA methylation patterns between patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and age- and sex-similar matched non-PD controls. Background: Epigenetic regulation is one of the major mechanisms for an organism to respond to the environment through changes in gene expression and has been implicated in numerous disease processes. We would like to examine epigenetic modification patterns that may predispose or protect against PD. Methods: Frozen tissue samples of the human cerebral cortex from 12 PD patients and 12 subjects without PD pathology were obtained. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling was performed using the Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip array. Differential methylation was defined as a mean methylation level difference (delta β) of at least 0.20 (Δβ ≥ 0.20). Methylation regions with an absolute delta β value ≥ 0.20 were selected for further gene function studies. Results: We identified 2795 differentially methylated CpG sites in the frontal cortex of PD cases with a detection p-value of ≤ 0.01 and 328 differentially methylated CpG sites with a detection p-value of ≤ 0.001. A pattern of robust hypermethylation of synphilin-1, α-synuclein-interacting protein (SNCAIP) gene was found in the brain of PD cases (p = 4.93 × 10−7 and delta β = 0.60). Conclusion: Our findings support a link between SNCAIP methylation and PD risk. Hypomethylation of SNCAIP may function to protect against PD. The current results may suggest that the methylation status of SNCAIP could be useful as a marker in PD diagnosis and treatment and warrants further investigation.


  • Open Access

    The identification of trans-associations between prostate cancer GWAS SNPs and RNA expression differences in tumor-adjacent stroma

    by Xin Chen, Michael McClelland, Zhenyu Jia, Farah B. Rahmatpanah, Anne Sawyers, Jeffrey Trent, David Duggan, Dan Mercola

    // <![CDATA[ $('.header-date').hide();$('#titleAuthors').hide();$('#abstractHeader').hide(); // ]]> Xin Chen1, Michael McClelland2, 3, Zhenyu Jia2, 4, 5, Farah B. Rahmatpanah2, Anne Sawyers2, Jeffrey Trent6, David Duggan7, Dan Mercola2 1Genomics Center, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, 92354, United States of America 2Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California, 92697, United States of America 3Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Irvine, California, 92697, United States of America 4Department of Statistics, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, 44325, United States of America 5Department of Family & Community Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio, 44272, United States of America 6Genetic Basis of Human Disease Division, The Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, 85004, United States of America 7Integrated Cancer Genomics Division, The Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, 85004, United States of America Correspondence to: Xin Chen, e-mail: xchen@llu.edu Dan Mercola, e-mail: dmercola@uci.edu Keywords: SNPs, eQTL, prostate cancer Received: August 14, 2014 Accepted: November 17, 2014 Published: February 09, 2015 ABSTRACT Here we tested the hypothesis that SNPs associated with prostate cancer risk, might differentially affect RNA expression in prostate cancer stroma. The most significant 35 SNP loci were selected from Genome Wide Association (GWA) studies of ~40,000 patients. We also selected 4030 transcripts previously associated with prostate cancer diagnosis and prognosis. eQTL analysis was carried out by a modified BAYES method to analyze the associations between the risk variants and expressed transcripts jointly in a single model. We observed 47 significant associations between eight risk variants and the expression patterns of 46 genes. This is the first study to identify associations between multiple SNPs and multiple in trans gene expression differences in cancer stroma. Potentially, a combination of SNPs and associated expression differences in prostate stroma may increase the power of risk assessment for individuals, and for cancer progression.