Shivaani Kummar
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Shivaani Kummar has a total of 33 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Erin A. Donovan
Medical Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10/12N226, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States
2 shared publicationsAlice Chen
Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland and
1 shared publicationAnthony J. Murgo
Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland and
1 shared publicationAustin Duffy
Medical Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
1 shared publicationBarbara Conley
Medical Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research and
1 shared publication- Bevin C. English
Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 14 July 2010
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 29 (1) , 1-8
Hypertension and hand-foot skin reactions related to VEGFR2 genotype and improved clinical outcome following bevacizumab and sorafenib
Background: Hypertension (HT) and hand-foot skin reactions (HFSR) may be related to the activity of bevacizumab and sorafenib. We hypothesized that these toxicities would correspond to favorable outcome in these drugs, that HT and HFSR would coincide, and thatVEGFR2genotypic variation would be related to toxicity and clinical outcomes.Methods: Toxicities (≥ grade 2 HT or HFSR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) following treatment initiation were evaluated. Toxicity incidence and VEGFR2 H472Q and V297I status were compared to clinical outcomes.Results: Individuals experiencing HT had longer PFS following bevacizumab therapy than those without this toxicity in trials utilizing bevacizumab in patients with prostate cancer (31.5 vs 14.9 months,n= 60,P= 0.0009), and bevacizumab and sorafenib in patients with solid tumors (11.9 vs. 3.7 months,n= 27,P= 0.052). HT was also linked to a > 5-fold OS benefit after sorafenib and bevacizumab cotherapy (5.7 versus 29.0 months,P= 0.0068). HFSR was a marker for prolonged PFS during sorafenib therapy (6.1 versus 3.7 months respectively,n= 113,P= 0.0003). HT was a risk factor for HFSR in patients treated with bevacizumab and/or sorafenib (OR(95%CI) = 3.2(1.5-6.8),P= 0.0024). Carriers of variant alleles at VEGFR2 H472Q experienced greater risk of developing HT (OR(95%CI) = 2.3(1.2 - 4.6),n= 170,P= 0.0154) and HFSR (OR(95%CI) = 2.7(1.3 - 5.6),n= 170,P= 0.0136).Conclusions: This study suggests that HT and HFSR may be markers for favorable clinical outcome, HT development may be a marker for HFSR, andVEGFR2alleles may be related to the development of toxicities during therapy with bevacizumab and/or sorafenib.
- 14 July 2010
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 29 (1) , 1-8
Open AccessHypertension and hand-foot skin reactions related to VEGFR2 genotype and improved clinical outcome following bevacizumab and sorafenib
Background: Hypertension (HT) and hand-foot skin reactions (HFSR) may be related to the activity of bevacizumab and sorafenib. We hypothesized that these toxicities would correspond to favorable outcome in these drugs, that HT and HFSR would coincide, and thatVEGFR2genotypic variation would be related to toxicity and clinical outcomes.Methods: Toxicities (≥ grade 2 HT or HFSR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) following treatment initiation were evaluated. Toxicity incidence and VEGFR2 H472Q and V297I status were compared to clinical outcomes.Results: Individuals experiencing HT had longer PFS following bevacizumab therapy than those without this toxicity in trials utilizing bevacizumab in patients with prostate cancer (31.5 vs 14.9 months,n= 60,P= 0.0009), and bevacizumab and sorafenib in patients with solid tumors (11.9 vs. 3.7 months,n= 27,P= 0.052). HT was also linked to a > 5-fold OS benefit after sorafenib and bevacizumab cotherapy (5.7 versus 29.0 months,P= 0.0068). HFSR was a marker for prolonged PFS during sorafenib therapy (6.1 versus 3.7 months respectively,n= 113,P= 0.0003). HT was a risk factor for HFSR in patients treated with bevacizumab and/or sorafenib (OR(95%CI) = 3.2(1.5-6.8),P= 0.0024). Carriers of variant alleles at VEGFR2 H472Q experienced greater risk of developing HT (OR(95%CI) = 2.3(1.2 - 4.6),n= 170,P= 0.0154) and HFSR (OR(95%CI) = 2.7(1.3 - 5.6),n= 170,P= 0.0136).Conclusions: This study suggests that HT and HFSR may be markers for favorable clinical outcome, HT development may be a marker for HFSR, andVEGFR2alleles may be related to the development of toxicities during therapy with bevacizumab and/or sorafenib.
- 1 January 2010
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Therapeutics
- Vol. 17 (1) , 79-85
Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Current Standards, Future Directions
Pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer death in the United States. In the landmark study in 1997, which established the central although modest role of gemcitabine in this disease, progress has been incremental. Significant developments have been an increased acceptance for combination chemotherapy in patients with good performance status in addition to an increased understanding of tumorigenesis. The parallel technologic and engineering developments that have occurred hold the promise of exploiting this understanding. This review attempts to summarize the standard therapeutic approach to metastatic pancreatic cancer and point to areas that hold promise for the future.
- 1 January 2010
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Therapeutics
- Vol. 17 (1) , 79-85
Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Current Standards, Future Directions
Pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer death in the United States. In the landmark study in 1997, which established the central although modest role of gemcitabine in this disease, progress has been incremental. Significant developments have been an increased acceptance for combination chemotherapy in patients with good performance status in addition to an increased understanding of tumorigenesis. The parallel technologic and engineering developments that have occurred hold the promise of exploiting this understanding. This review attempts to summarize the standard therapeutic approach to metastatic pancreatic cancer and point to areas that hold promise for the future.
- 1 May 2008
- Published by Elsevier in Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
- Vol. 66 (2) , 91-98
Role of insulin-like growth factor-1R system in colorectal carcinogenesis
- 1 May 2008
- Published by Elsevier in Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
- Vol. 66 (2) , 91-98
Role of insulin-like growth factor-1R system in colorectal carcinogenesis
- 15 September 2007
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 13 (18) , 5411-5417
Phase I Trial of MS-275, a Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor, Administered Weekly in Refractory Solid Tumors and Lymphoid Malignancies
Purpose: MS-275 is a histone deacetylase inhibitor that has shown potent and unique anticancer activity in preclinical models. The aims of this phase I trial were to determine the dose-limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated dose of oral MS-275 in humans administered with food on a once weekly schedule and to study the pharmacokinetics of oral MS-275. Experimental Design: Patients with refractory solid tumors and lymphoid malignancies were treated with oral MS-275 on a once weekly schedule for 4 weeks of a 6-week cycle. Samples for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses were collected during cycle 1. Protein acetylation in subpopulations of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was measured using a multivariable flow cytometry assay. Results: A total of 22 patients were enrolled, and 19 were considered evaluable for toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose was 6 mg/m2. No National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 4 toxicities were observed. Dose-limiting grade 3 toxicities were reversible and consisted of hypophosphatemia, hyponatremia, and hypoalbuminemia. Non–dose-limiting grade 3 myelosuppression was also observed. The mean terminal half-life of MS-275 was 33.9 ± 26.2 and the Tmax ranged from 0.5 to 24 h. Although there was considerable interpatient variability in pharmacokinetics, the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve increased linearly with dose. Conclusions: MS-275 is well tolerated at a dose of 6 mg/m2 administered weekly with food for 4 weeks every 6 weeks. Drug exposure increases linearly with dose, and protein acetylation increased in all the subpopulations of peripheral blood mononuclear cells following MS-275 administration.
- 15 September 2007
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 13 (18) , 5411-5417
Phase I Trial of MS-275, a Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor, Administered Weekly in Refractory Solid Tumors and Lymphoid Malignancies
Purpose: MS-275 is a histone deacetylase inhibitor that has shown potent and unique anticancer activity in preclinical models. The aims of this phase I trial were to determine the dose-limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated dose of oral MS-275 in humans administered with food on a once weekly schedule and to study the pharmacokinetics of oral MS-275. Experimental Design: Patients with refractory solid tumors and lymphoid malignancies were treated with oral MS-275 on a once weekly schedule for 4 weeks of a 6-week cycle. Samples for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses were collected during cycle 1. Protein acetylation in subpopulations of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was measured using a multivariable flow cytometry assay. Results: A total of 22 patients were enrolled, and 19 were considered evaluable for toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose was 6 mg/m2. No National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 4 toxicities were observed. Dose-limiting grade 3 toxicities were reversible and consisted of hypophosphatemia, hyponatremia, and hypoalbuminemia. Non–dose-limiting grade 3 myelosuppression was also observed. The mean terminal half-life of MS-275 was 33.9 ± 26.2 and the Tmax ranged from 0.5 to 24 h. Although there was considerable interpatient variability in pharmacokinetics, the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve increased linearly with dose. Conclusions: MS-275 is well tolerated at a dose of 6 mg/m2 administered weekly with food for 4 weeks every 6 weeks. Drug exposure increases linearly with dose, and protein acetylation increased in all the subpopulations of peripheral blood mononuclear cells following MS-275 administration.
- 28 February 2006
- Published by Elsevier in Current Problems in Cancer
- Vol. 30 (1) , 7-32
Targeting VEGF in Cancer Therapy
- 28 February 2006
- Published by Elsevier in Current Problems in Cancer
- Vol. 30 (1) , 7-32
Targeting VEGF in Cancer Therapy