Alberto Pisacane
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Alberto Pisacane has a total of 51 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alessandra Merlini
Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
2 shared publications - Alice Borsano
Unit of Surgical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, Fondazione del Piemonte per l’Oncologia—IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy
2 shared publications - Dario Sangiolo
Dipartimento di Oncologia, Università di Torino, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Viale della Ricerca 7, 10060 Candiolo, Turin, Italy
2 shared publications - Enrico Berrino
Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy
2 shared publications - Giovanni Grignani
Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS Strada Provinciale 142 Km 3.95 10060 Candiolo TO Italy
2 shared publications - Manuela Robella
Department of Surgery, IRCCS Istituto di Candiolo, Candiolo, Italy
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 8 September 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Vol. 23 (18) , 10368
Integrated Antitumor Activities of Cellular Immunotherapy with CIK Lymphocytes and Interferons against KIT/PDGFRA Wild Type GIST
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare, mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, characterized by either KIT or PDGFRA mutation in about 85% of cases. KIT/PDGFRA wild type gastrointestinal stromal tumors (wtGIST) account for the remaining 15% of GIST and represent an unmet medical need: their prevalence and potential medical vulnerabilities are not completely defined, and effective therapeutic strategies are still lacking. In this study we set a patient-derived preclinical model of wtGIST to investigate their phenotypic features, along with their susceptibility to cellular immunotherapy with cytokine-induced killer lymphocytes (CIK) and interferons (IFN). We generated 11 wtGIST primary cell lines (wtGISTc). The main CIK ligands (MIC A/B; ULBPs), along with PD-L1/2, were expressed by wtGISTc and the expression of HLA-I molecules was preserved. Patient-derived CIK were capable of intense killing in vitro against wtGISTc resistant to both imatinib and sunitinib. We found that CIK produce a high level of granzyme B, IFNα and IFNγ. CIK-conditioned supernatant was responsible for part of the observed tumoricidal effect, along with positive bystander modulatory activities enhancing the expression of PD-L1/2 and HLA-I molecules. IFNα, but not In, had direct antitumor effects on 50% (4/8) of TKI-resistant wtGISTc, positively correlated with the tumor expression of IFN receptors. wtGIST cells that survived IFNα were still sensitive to CIK immunotherapy. Our data support the exploration of CIK immunotherapy in clinical studies for TKI-resistant wtGIST, proposing reevaluation for IFNα within this challenging setting.
- 8 September 2022
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Vol. 23 (18) , 10368
Open AccessIntegrated Antitumor Activities of Cellular Immunotherapy with CIK Lymphocytes and Interferons against KIT/PDGFRA Wild Type GIST
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare, mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, characterized by either KIT or PDGFRA mutation in about 85% of cases. KIT/PDGFRA wild type gastrointestinal stromal tumors (wtGIST) account for the remaining 15% of GIST and represent an unmet medical need: their prevalence and potential medical vulnerabilities are not completely defined, and effective therapeutic strategies are still lacking. In this study we set a patient-derived preclinical model of wtGIST to investigate their phenotypic features, along with their susceptibility to cellular immunotherapy with cytokine-induced killer lymphocytes (CIK) and interferons (IFN). We generated 11 wtGIST primary cell lines (wtGISTc). The main CIK ligands (MIC A/B; ULBPs), along with PD-L1/2, were expressed by wtGISTc and the expression of HLA-I molecules was preserved. Patient-derived CIK were capable of intense killing in vitro against wtGISTc resistant to both imatinib and sunitinib. We found that CIK produce a high level of granzyme B, IFNα and IFNγ. CIK-conditioned supernatant was responsible for part of the observed tumoricidal effect, along with positive bystander modulatory activities enhancing the expression of PD-L1/2 and HLA-I molecules. IFNα, but not In, had direct antitumor effects on 50% (4/8) of TKI-resistant wtGISTc, positively correlated with the tumor expression of IFN receptors. wtGIST cells that survived IFNα were still sensitive to CIK immunotherapy. Our data support the exploration of CIK immunotherapy in clinical studies for TKI-resistant wtGIST, proposing reevaluation for IFNα within this challenging setting.
- Open Access
PARP1 Inhibitor and Trabectedin Combination Does Not Increase Tumor Mutational Burden in Advanced Sarcomas—A Preclinical and Translational Study
Drug-induced tumor mutational burden (TMB) may contribute to unleashing the immune response in relatively “immune-cold” tumors, such as sarcomas. We previously showed that PARP1 inhibition perpetuates the DNA damage induced by the chemotherapeutic agent trabectedin in both preclinical models and sarcoma patients. In the present work, we explored acquired genetic changes in DNA repair genes, mutational signatures, and TMB in a translational platform composed of cell lines, xenografts, and tumor samples from patients treated with trabectedin and olaparib combination, compared to cells treated with temozolomide, an alkylating agent that induces hypermutation. Whole-exome and targeted panel sequencing data analyses revealed that three cycles of trabectedin and olaparib combination neither affected the mutational profiles, DNA repair gene status, or copy number alterations, nor increased TMB both in homologous recombinant-defective and proficient cells or in xenografts. Moreover, TMB was not increased in tumor specimens derived from trabectedin- and olaparib-treated patients (5–6 cycles) when compared to pre-treatment biopsies. Conversely, repeated treatments with temozolomide induced a massive TMB increase in the SJSA-1 osteosarcoma model. In conclusion, a trabectedin and olaparib combination did not show mutagenic effects and is unlikely to prime subsequent immune-therapeutic interventions based on TMB increase. On the other hand, these findings are reassuring in the increasing warning of treatment-induced hematologic malignancies correlated to PARP1 inhibitor use.
Open AccessPARP1 Inhibitor and Trabectedin Combination Does Not Increase Tumor Mutational Burden in Advanced Sarcomas—A Preclinical and Translational Study
Drug-induced tumor mutational burden (TMB) may contribute to unleashing the immune response in relatively “immune-cold” tumors, such as sarcomas. We previously showed that PARP1 inhibition perpetuates the DNA damage induced by the chemotherapeutic agent trabectedin in both preclinical models and sarcoma patients. In the present work, we explored acquired genetic changes in DNA repair genes, mutational signatures, and TMB in a translational platform composed of cell lines, xenografts, and tumor samples from patients treated with trabectedin and olaparib combination, compared to cells treated with temozolomide, an alkylating agent that induces hypermutation. Whole-exome and targeted panel sequencing data analyses revealed that three cycles of trabectedin and olaparib combination neither affected the mutational profiles, DNA repair gene status, or copy number alterations, nor increased TMB both in homologous recombinant-defective and proficient cells or in xenografts. Moreover, TMB was not increased in tumor specimens derived from trabectedin- and olaparib-treated patients (5–6 cycles) when compared to pre-treatment biopsies. Conversely, repeated treatments with temozolomide induced a massive TMB increase in the SJSA-1 osteosarcoma model. In conclusion, a trabectedin and olaparib combination did not show mutagenic effects and is unlikely to prime subsequent immune-therapeutic interventions based on TMB increase. On the other hand, these findings are reassuring in the increasing warning of treatment-induced hematologic malignancies correlated to PARP1 inhibitor use.
- Open Access
Improved Outcome Prediction for Appendiceal Pseudomyxoma Peritonei by Integration of Cancer Cell and Stromal Transcriptional Profiles
In recent years, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have substantially improved the clinical outcome of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) originating from mucinous appendiceal cancer. However, current histopathological grading of appendiceal PMP frequently fails in predicting disease outcome. We recently observed that the integration of cancer cell transcriptional traits with those of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) improves prognostic prediction for tumors of the large intestine. We therefore generated global expression profiles on a consecutive series of 24 PMP patients treated with CRS plus HIPEC. Multiple lesions were profiled for nine patients. We then used expression data to stratify the samples by a previously published “high-risk appendiceal cancer” (HRAC) signature and by a CAF signature that we previously developed for colorectal cancer, or by a combination of both. The prognostic value of the HRAC signature was confirmed in our cohort and further improved by integration of the CAF signature. Classification of cases profiled for multiple lesions revealed the existence of outlier samples and highlighted the need of profiling multiple PMP lesions to select representative samples for optimal performances. The integrated predictor was subsequently validated in an independent PMP cohort. These results provide new insights into PMP biology, revealing a previously unrecognized prognostic role of the stromal component and supporting integration of standard pathological grade with the HRAC and CAF transcriptional signatures to better predict disease outcome.
Open AccessImproved Outcome Prediction for Appendiceal Pseudomyxoma Peritonei by Integration of Cancer Cell and Stromal Transcriptional Profiles
In recent years, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have substantially improved the clinical outcome of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) originating from mucinous appendiceal cancer. However, current histopathological grading of appendiceal PMP frequently fails in predicting disease outcome. We recently observed that the integration of cancer cell transcriptional traits with those of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) improves prognostic prediction for tumors of the large intestine. We therefore generated global expression profiles on a consecutive series of 24 PMP patients treated with CRS plus HIPEC. Multiple lesions were profiled for nine patients. We then used expression data to stratify the samples by a previously published “high-risk appendiceal cancer” (HRAC) signature and by a CAF signature that we previously developed for colorectal cancer, or by a combination of both. The prognostic value of the HRAC signature was confirmed in our cohort and further improved by integration of the CAF signature. Classification of cases profiled for multiple lesions revealed the existence of outlier samples and highlighted the need of profiling multiple PMP lesions to select representative samples for optimal performances. The integrated predictor was subsequently validated in an independent PMP cohort. These results provide new insights into PMP biology, revealing a previously unrecognized prognostic role of the stromal component and supporting integration of standard pathological grade with the HRAC and CAF transcriptional signatures to better predict disease outcome.
- Open Access
- 30 April 2020
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomedicines
- Vol. 8 (5) , 102
Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) with Oxaliplatin, Cisplatin, and Doxorubicin in Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Clinical Trial
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is an innovative approach for treating peritoneal carcinomatosis that applies chemotherapeutic drugs into the peritoneal cavity as an under-pressure airflow. It improves local bioavailability of cytostatic drugs as compared to conventional intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The aim of this study is to prove feasibility, efficacy and safety of this new treatment. Patients included in the analysis underwent at least two single port PIPAC procedures; drugs used were Oxaliplatin for colorectal cancers and Cisplatin + Doxorubicin for ovarian, gastric, and primary peritoneal cancers. The primary endpoint was the Disease Control Rate according to the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria. Secondary significant endpoints were overall and progression free survival, tumor regression on histology, and quality of life. Safety and tolerability were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4. Sixty-three patients were enrolled in this trial. Forty patients (100 PIPAC) were eligible for analysis. Twenty patients were undergoing systemic chemotherapy. Fourteen patients reported an objective response (35%). Median overall survival was 18.1 months; median progression-free survival was 7.4 months. Minor morbidity was observed in seven procedures. Grade 3 complications occurred in two patients, and grade 4 in one patient submitted to reoperation. Single-port PIPAC is feasible, safe, and easy to perform. The combined treatment based on systemic chemotherapy and PIPAC does not induce significant hepatic and renal toxicity and can be considered a valid therapeutic option in patients with advanced peritoneal disease. Further studies on the use of PIPAC alone, possibly with different drug dosages, may define the real effectiveness of the procedure.
- 30 April 2020
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomedicines
- Vol. 8 (5) , 102
Open AccessPressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) with Oxaliplatin, Cisplatin, and Doxorubicin in Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Clinical Trial
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is an innovative approach for treating peritoneal carcinomatosis that applies chemotherapeutic drugs into the peritoneal cavity as an under-pressure airflow. It improves local bioavailability of cytostatic drugs as compared to conventional intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The aim of this study is to prove feasibility, efficacy and safety of this new treatment. Patients included in the analysis underwent at least two single port PIPAC procedures; drugs used were Oxaliplatin for colorectal cancers and Cisplatin + Doxorubicin for ovarian, gastric, and primary peritoneal cancers. The primary endpoint was the Disease Control Rate according to the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria. Secondary significant endpoints were overall and progression free survival, tumor regression on histology, and quality of life. Safety and tolerability were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4. Sixty-three patients were enrolled in this trial. Forty patients (100 PIPAC) were eligible for analysis. Twenty patients were undergoing systemic chemotherapy. Fourteen patients reported an objective response (35%). Median overall survival was 18.1 months; median progression-free survival was 7.4 months. Minor morbidity was observed in seven procedures. Grade 3 complications occurred in two patients, and grade 4 in one patient submitted to reoperation. Single-port PIPAC is feasible, safe, and easy to perform. The combined treatment based on systemic chemotherapy and PIPAC does not induce significant hepatic and renal toxicity and can be considered a valid therapeutic option in patients with advanced peritoneal disease. Further studies on the use of PIPAC alone, possibly with different drug dosages, may define the real effectiveness of the procedure.
- 27 October 2019
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 26-29
Angiosarcoma of the Breast
- 31 July 2018
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1-3
Angiosarcoma of the Breast
- Open Access
- 1 January 2007
- Published by Wiley in Analytical Cellular Pathology
- Vol. 29 (1) , 59-66
CD31 and CD34 Expression as Immunohistochemical Markers of Endothelial Transdifferentiation in Human Cutaneous Melanoma
Introduction: Vasculogenic mimicry, as previously described in aggressive melanoma, is characterized by the de novo generation of intratumoral patterned vascular channels, composed of PAS‐positive basement membrane in the absence of endothelial cells, providing additional microcirculation, in support to the classic tumoral angiogenesis. Methods: We investigated the immunohistochemical expression of two endothelial markers, CD31 and CD34, in tumoral cells of 60 melanomas (45 primary cutaneous and 15 metastatic) as possible evidence of vasculogenic mimicry. In addition we investigated the relationship between CD31 and CD34 expression and three pathological markers such as Clark’s level, and skin ulceration, predictive of melanoma’s aggressive behaviour, and mitotic index. Results: No cases of common melanocytic nevi immunoreacted with CD31 or CD34. Random CD31 immunoreactivity was present in 6% of Clark’s level I/II, 50% of Clark′s level III and 80% Clark′s level IV/V. CD34 was negative in Clark′s level I/II but randomly stained the 20% and 55% of level III and IV/V respectively. 66% (10/15) of metastatic melanomas were CD31 positive showing a canalicular immunostaining pattern, conversely CD34 expression was never found. 7/8 cutaneous ulcerated melanomas immunostained for CD31 and 4/8 for CD34. CD31 immunostained 88% high/intermediate MI, and 53% of low MI melanomas. CD34 decorated the 29% of high/intermediate and 38% of low MI melanomas. Conclusions: CD31 and CD34 immunoreactivity closely parallel both the different morphologic steps of melanocytic tumor progression and the presence of histological parameters related to the aggressive behaviour. Their expression could be related to endothelial transdifferentiation of melanoma cells although a consequent functional role has not been demonstrated yet.
- 1 January 2007
- Published by Wiley in Analytical Cellular Pathology
- Vol. 29 (1) , 59-66
Open AccessCD31 and CD34 Expression as Immunohistochemical Markers of Endothelial Transdifferentiation in Human Cutaneous Melanoma
Introduction: Vasculogenic mimicry, as previously described in aggressive melanoma, is characterized by the de novo generation of intratumoral patterned vascular channels, composed of PAS‐positive basement membrane in the absence of endothelial cells, providing additional microcirculation, in support to the classic tumoral angiogenesis. Methods: We investigated the immunohistochemical expression of two endothelial markers, CD31 and CD34, in tumoral cells of 60 melanomas (45 primary cutaneous and 15 metastatic) as possible evidence of vasculogenic mimicry. In addition we investigated the relationship between CD31 and CD34 expression and three pathological markers such as Clark’s level, and skin ulceration, predictive of melanoma’s aggressive behaviour, and mitotic index. Results: No cases of common melanocytic nevi immunoreacted with CD31 or CD34. Random CD31 immunoreactivity was present in 6% of Clark’s level I/II, 50% of Clark′s level III and 80% Clark′s level IV/V. CD34 was negative in Clark′s level I/II but randomly stained the 20% and 55% of level III and IV/V respectively. 66% (10/15) of metastatic melanomas were CD31 positive showing a canalicular immunostaining pattern, conversely CD34 expression was never found. 7/8 cutaneous ulcerated melanomas immunostained for CD31 and 4/8 for CD34. CD31 immunostained 88% high/intermediate MI, and 53% of low MI melanomas. CD34 decorated the 29% of high/intermediate and 38% of low MI melanomas. Conclusions: CD31 and CD34 immunoreactivity closely parallel both the different morphologic steps of melanocytic tumor progression and the presence of histological parameters related to the aggressive behaviour. Their expression could be related to endothelial transdifferentiation of melanoma cells although a consequent functional role has not been demonstrated yet.
- 1 February 2005
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Melanoma Research
- Vol. 15 (1) , 39-43
VEGF and VEGFR-2 immunohistochemistry in human melanocytic naevi and cutaneous melanomas
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) play a key role in vasculogenesis and angiogenic sprouting, which are crucial for tumour development and metastasis. In order to determine their possible role in the acquisition of metastatic potential throughout melanocytic tumour progression, VEGF and VEGFR-2 immunohistochemical expression were evaluated in 36 human melanocytic tumours of the skin (24 malignant melanomas and 12 common naevi). Different VEGFR-2 immunostaining patterns were detected in the vast majority of melanomas (21/24; 88%). A nuclear membrane-like pattern was mainly associated with in situ and microinvasive melanomas, whereas a combined cytoplasmic membrane and nuclear membrane-like pattern was seen in invasive melanomas. A nuclear membrane-like pattern was also observed in 83% (10/12) of common naevi. Cytoplasmic immunostaining for VEGF was observed in 72% (8/11) of in situ/microinvasive melanomas, 84% (11/13) of invasive melanomas and 91% (11/12) of naevi. CD31 was also investigated as an immunohistochemical marker for microvessel density (MVD) evaluation. No associations were found between MVD and VEGF/VEGFR-2 expression. Taken together, these data indicate that VEGF production is a common event in benign melanocytic tumours, whereas VEGFR-2 expression, co-localized in the cytoplasmic and nuclear membrane, is associated with progression towards invasive melanoma. The role exerted by VEGF/VEGFR-2, however, seems to be independent of the development of a tumour-related capillary network.
- 1 February 2005
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Melanoma Research
- Vol. 15 (1) , 39-43
VEGF and VEGFR-2 immunohistochemistry in human melanocytic naevi and cutaneous melanomas
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) play a key role in vasculogenesis and angiogenic sprouting, which are crucial for tumour development and metastasis. In order to determine their possible role in the acquisition of metastatic potential throughout melanocytic tumour progression, VEGF and VEGFR-2 immunohistochemical expression were evaluated in 36 human melanocytic tumours of the skin (24 malignant melanomas and 12 common naevi). Different VEGFR-2 immunostaining patterns were detected in the vast majority of melanomas (21/24; 88%). A nuclear membrane-like pattern was mainly associated with in situ and microinvasive melanomas, whereas a combined cytoplasmic membrane and nuclear membrane-like pattern was seen in invasive melanomas. A nuclear membrane-like pattern was also observed in 83% (10/12) of common naevi. Cytoplasmic immunostaining for VEGF was observed in 72% (8/11) of in situ/microinvasive melanomas, 84% (11/13) of invasive melanomas and 91% (11/12) of naevi. CD31 was also investigated as an immunohistochemical marker for microvessel density (MVD) evaluation. No associations were found between MVD and VEGF/VEGFR-2 expression. Taken together, these data indicate that VEGF production is a common event in benign melanocytic tumours, whereas VEGFR-2 expression, co-localized in the cytoplasmic and nuclear membrane, is associated with progression towards invasive melanoma. The role exerted by VEGF/VEGFR-2, however, seems to be independent of the development of a tumour-related capillary network.