Carlos P. Cruz
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Carlos P. Cruz has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Aliza T. Brown
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and the Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, AR
1 shared publicationChristy Capps
Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham St., Slot 520-2, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
1 shared publicationJohn F Eidt
Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham St., Slot 520-2, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
1 shared publicationJohn F. Eidt
1 shared publicationLeah Kirtley
Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham St., Slot 520-2, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
1 shared publicationM. Moursi
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and the Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System; 4301 W. Markham St, Slot 520-2, Little Rock, AR 72205-7199
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 January 2004
- Published by SAGE Publications in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
- Vol. 38 (1) , 57-62
Correlation Between Preoperative and Postoperative Duplex Vein Measurements of the Greater Saphenous Vein Used for infrainguinal Arterial Reconstruction
Vein diameter measurements using B-mode Doppler ultrasound (US) are used to assess the greater saphenous vein (GSV) for bypass operations; a 2.5–3.0 mm diameter is suggested as a minimum. Preoperative measurements are made while the vein is in the low-pressure venous system. This may not reflect the distended diameter of a vein after placement in the arterial system. This study compares preoperative and postoperative GSV diameters to identify the degree of dilatation and the minimal size adequate for use in arterial bypass operations. The GSV of 11 patients undergoing an infrainguinal arterial bypass were assessed by utilizing Doppler US. Measurements were taken every 10 cm, for 70 cm, along the course of the GSV before and 4 weeks after operation. All segments showed a percent increase in diameter from the preoperative to postoperative time points; 10 cm, 38%; 20 cm, 31%; 30 cm, 16%; 40 cm, 26%; 50 cm, 23%; 60 cm, 28%; and 70 cm, 22%. A Bonferroni post hoc analysis between the 2 time point means showed a significant increase in means for the 2 time points of 9.49 units (Bonf p value 4.1 mm. All showed a significant increase over time. Preoperative diameter measurements of the vein may not reflect the final distended diameter after bypass. Preoperative vein diameters =3.0 mm showed a significant increase of 33% to nearly 4.0 mm. This was the largest increase observed in any segment measured. A potential 16–33% increase in vein diameter should be considered in vein mapping. The rejection of small veins (=3.0 mm) in preoperative vein-mapping studies may not be warranted given the potential for a substantial increase in size when placed in the arterial system.
- 1 January 2004
- Published by SAGE Publications in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
- Vol. 38 (1) , 57-62
Correlation Between Preoperative and Postoperative Duplex Vein Measurements of the Greater Saphenous Vein Used for infrainguinal Arterial Reconstruction
Vein diameter measurements using B-mode Doppler ultrasound (US) are used to assess the greater saphenous vein (GSV) for bypass operations; a 2.5–3.0 mm diameter is suggested as a minimum. Preoperative measurements are made while the vein is in the low-pressure venous system. This may not reflect the distended diameter of a vein after placement in the arterial system. This study compares preoperative and postoperative GSV diameters to identify the degree of dilatation and the minimal size adequate for use in arterial bypass operations. The GSV of 11 patients undergoing an infrainguinal arterial bypass were assessed by utilizing Doppler US. Measurements were taken every 10 cm, for 70 cm, along the course of the GSV before and 4 weeks after operation. All segments showed a percent increase in diameter from the preoperative to postoperative time points; 10 cm, 38%; 20 cm, 31%; 30 cm, 16%; 40 cm, 26%; 50 cm, 23%; 60 cm, 28%; and 70 cm, 22%. A Bonferroni post hoc analysis between the 2 time point means showed a significant increase in means for the 2 time points of 9.49 units (Bonf p value 4.1 mm. All showed a significant increase over time. Preoperative diameter measurements of the vein may not reflect the final distended diameter after bypass. Preoperative vein diameters =3.0 mm showed a significant increase of 33% to nearly 4.0 mm. This was the largest increase observed in any segment measured. A potential 16–33% increase in vein diameter should be considered in vein mapping. The rejection of small veins (=3.0 mm) in preoperative vein-mapping studies may not be warranted given the potential for a substantial increase in size when placed in the arterial system.
- 1 November 2003
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 186 (5) , 449-454
Major lower extremity amputations at a Veterans Affairs hospital
- 1 November 2003
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 186 (5) , 449-454
Major lower extremity amputations at a Veterans Affairs hospital