Ferdinand W. N. M. Wit

Chloroquine (CQ) and Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have been proposed to be effective at treating COVID-19 patients. We, and others, have previously reported on the capacity of CQ to reduce HIV-1 replication in vitro . We tested CQ administration in post-partum mothers on influencing HIV-1 viral loads in human milk as a means of lowering mother to child transmission. A Phase I/II, randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate chloroquine administration to reduce HIV-1 RNA levels in human milk: the CHARGE study. Thirty HIV-1 positive pregnant Rwandese women (CQ n = 20; placebo n = 10) were enrolled in a 16-week study, with the treatment group receiving a 200 mg oral dose of CQ daily. Base-line plasma viral load (pVL) measurements and CD4 counts were determined prior to delivery, and pVL, breast milk VL (bmVL) and CQ levels measured during treatment. For women receiving treatment, CQ concentration was higher in breast milk compared to plasma (over 2.5-fold), with a positive correlation between the levels in the two compartments (P < 0.003). A link between high CQ concentrations in plasma and high CD4 counts ( P < 0.001) was observed. Surprisingly, we found a significant increase in pVL after CQ treatment in over half of the mothers (n=11; P < 0.001) and with no alteration to bmVL measurements. No specific amino acid alterations in the gp120 envelope sequences could be associated with CQ administration. CQ usage is associated with a significant increase to pVL in early breastfeeding mothers from Rwanda which cautions against the use of CQ in such individuals. Our results highlight a discrepancy between CQ effects on modulating HIV-1 replication in vitro versus in vivo and indicate caution when prescribing CQ to postpartum HIV-1 untreated mothers. This discrepancy should be taken into consideration when testing CQ or HCQ treatment in COVID-19 clinical trials, especially relating to the post-partum setting.

Nodding syndrome (NS) is a devastating epileptic illness of unknown aetiology mainly affecting children 5–15 years of age. Head nodding distinguishes NS from other forms of epilepsy. Other manifestations of the illness include mental and physical growth retardation. Many children die as a result of falling in fires or drowning. Recently, it was shown that NS is only one of the phenotypic presentations of onchocerciasis associated epilepsy (OAE). Despite the strong epidemiological association between epilepsy and onchocerciasis, the causal mechanism is unknown. After implementation of bi-annual community directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTi) and larviciding of rivers in northern Uganda, new cases of NS have ceased, while new cases continue to emerge in South Sudanese onchocerciasis-endemic areas with an interrupted CDTi programme. This study is designed to evaluate the potential effects of bi-annual CDTi on reducing the incidence of NS/OAE in onchocerciasis-endemic areas in South Sudan. A pre-intervention door-to-door population-based household survey will be conducted in selected onchocerciasis-endemic villages in Mundri and Maridi Counties, which have a high prevalence of epilepsy. Using a validated questionnaire, the entire village will be screened by community research assistants for suspected epilepsy cases. Suspected cases will be interviewed and examined by a trained clinical officer or medical doctor who will confirm or reject the diagnosis of epilepsy. Bi-annual CDTi will be implemented in the villages and a surveillance system for epilepsy set up. By implementing an epilepsy onchocerciasis awareness campaign we expect to obtain > 90% CDTi coverage of eligible individuals. The door-to-door survey will be repeated two years after the baseline survey. The incidence of NS/OAE will be compared before and after bi-annual CDTi. Our study is the first population-based study to evaluate the effect of bi-annual CDTi to reduce the incidence of NS/OAE. If the study demonstrates such a reduction, these findings are expected to motivate communities in onchocerciasis-endemic regions to participate in CDTi, and will encourage policy makers, funders and other stakeholders to increase their efforts to eliminate onchocerciasis.

Recommendations that nevirapine (NVP) should be avoided in female individuals with CD4 cell counts >250 cells/microL and in male individuals with CD4 cell counts >400 cells/microL are based on findings in treatment-naive patients. It is unclear whether these guidelines also apply to treatment-experienced patients switching to NVP-based combination therapy. Patients in the ATHENA cohort study who had used NVP-based combination therapy were included. We identified patients who discontinued NVP-based combination therapy because of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs; rash and/or hepatotoxicity) within 18 weeks after starting such therapy. We grouped patients according to their CD4 cell count at the start of NVP-based combination therapy (current CD4 cell count) as having a high CD4 cell count (for female patients, >250 cells/microL; for male patients, >400 cells/microL) or a low CD4 cell count. Treatment-experienced patients were further subdivided according to the last available CD4 cell count before first receipt of antiretroviral therapy (ART; pre-ART CD4 cell count) using the same criteria. Risk factors for HSR were assessed using multivariate logistic regression. Of 3752 patients receiving NVP-based combination therapy, 231 patients (6.2%) discontinued NVP therapy because of HSRs. Independent risk factors included female sex and Asian ethnicity. Having an undetectable viral load (VL) at the start of NVP therapy was associated with reduced risk of developing an HSR (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.71). Pretreated patients with low pre-ART and high current CD4 cell counts and a detectable VL when switching to NVP-based combination therapy had a significantly higher risk of developing an HSR, compared with treatment-naive patients who started NVP therapy with low CD4 cell counts (adjusted OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.11-3.12); pretreated patients with low pre-ART CD4 cell counts who switched to NVP therapy with a high current CD4 cell count and an undetectable VL did not have an increased risk of developing an HSR (adjusted OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.66-1.61). Treatment-experienced patients who start NVP-based combination therapy with low pre-ART and high current CD4 cell counts and an undetectable VL have a similar likelihood for discontinuing NVP therapy because of HSRs, compared with treatment-naive patients with low CD4 cell counts. This suggests that NVP-based combination therapy may be safely initiated in such patients. However, in similar patients with a detectable VL, it is prudent to continue to adhere to current CD4 cell count thresholds.

Although antiretroviral combination therapy has greatly improved the life expectancy of HIV-infected individuals, its use is hampered by considerable toxicity, the need for life-long near-perfect adherence to strict dosing regimens in order to avoid the emergence of drug resistance, and high cost. In this paper we review current understanding of when to best initiate antiretroviral therapy and what regimen to start with. The limitations of antiretroviral combination therapy are increasingly clear, and this has led to the current tendency to delay the initiation of therapy until CD4 cell counts have consistently dropped toward the 200 cells/mm3 mark, or until plasma HIV-1 RNA has increased to above 100,000 copies/mL. The need for optimal adherence also implies a "readiness" on the part of the patient to start treatment. Once the decision to commence therapy has been reached, what particular combinations of drugs to start with increasingly demands an individualized approach.

To investigate the influence of the CC chemokine receptor 2 64I and CC chemokine receptor 5 Δ32 polymorphisms on the virologic and immunologic response of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)–infected patients to highly active antiretroviral therapy, data from 4 clinical studies were pooled. The prevalence of the CCR5 Δ32 polymorphism was 21% (27 of 130 subjects), and the prevalence of the CCR2 64I polymorphism was 15% (19 of 130 subjects). There were no major differences between subjects with and without polymorphisms in the CCR5 and/or CCR2 genes with respect to the rate of initial viral clearance, proportion of subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels below the lower limit of quantification, rate of virologic treatment failure, immunologic responses, and disease progression during 96 weeks of follow-up

This retrospective cohort study investigated whether particular antiretroviral agents are associated with a higher risk for developing grade 4 liver

Objective: To assess the tolerability, virological, immunological and clinical effects of nevirapine in the setting of a compassionate use programme in pretreated HIV-infected individuals. Design: Retrospective observational cohort-study in 13 HIV-outpatient clinics in The Netherlands. Methods: Main outcome measures: plasma HIV-1 RNA levels; CD4 cell counts; incidence of new AIDS-defining diseases; multivariate analysis of predictors for virological success; incidence of skin rashes. Results: 187 HIV-infected individuals treated with nevirapine in the Nevirapine Named Patient Programme in The Netherlands were included. After 48 weeks, 38% of patients had an HIV-1 RNA level below 1000 copies/ml. In multivariate regression analysis, prior treatment with three or less nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and a higher baseline CD4 cell count was predictive of virological success. The median CD4 cell count remained stable over the 48 weeks. Eleven patients experienced a new AIDS-defining event. The total incidence of rash (including rash not leading to discontinuation of nevirapine) was 13.9 and 6.4% of the patients discontinued nevirapine because of rash. None of the 28 patients with undetectable HIV-1 RNA levels at baseline developed a rash. Conclusions: We conclude that nevirapine when used as part of salvage therapy, is safe and most likely to give sustained suppression of HIV-1 in patients that have been less extensively pretreated. CD4 cell counts remained stable despite the low rate of virological success, this also occurred in patients not concurrently using protease inhibitors (PIs). The incidence of nevirapine-related rash in PI-pretreated patients and especially in patients with undetectable HIV-1 RNA levels at the start of nevirapine treatment, is considerably lower than previously reported for antiretroviral-naive patients.

The outcome and predictors of virologic treatment failure of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) were determined for 271 human immunodeficie