Kapil K. Saharia

Background: Critical illness in coronavirus disease 2019 may require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. We quantified immunothrombotic markers in patients with COVID-19 receiving ECMO and evaluated their predictive capacity for death. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 74 consecutive patients with COVID-19 on ECMO at a single academic medical center between March 2020 and February 2021. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 nucleocapsid RNA and 16 immunothrombotic biomarkers were longitudinally quantified and their trajectories were used to predict death and decannulation across multiple models. Results: Male sex, smoking, serum bilirubin levels, and low partial arterial oxygen pressure–fraction of inspired oxygen ratio were associated with increased risk of death. Plasma levels of 10 immunothrombotic markers were significantly elevated in fatal cases and some were associated with an increased hazard of death (eg, interleukin 8, von Willebrand factor) or decreased hazard for decannulation (eg, angiopoietin 2, interleukin 1β) when adjusting for sex, smoking status, and time to cannulation. Predictive models incorporating biomarkers were superior to demographics alone and equivalent to models including clinical information. Conclusions: We found that male sex, smoking, and select clinical variables and immunothrombotic markers were risk factors for death in patients with COVID-19 on ECMO informing pathogenesis and prognostication of severe COVID-19.

The landscape of transplant infectious diseases (TID) is changing rapidly, with many new and exciting ideas on the horizon. A live #TxIDChat on the social media platform Bluesky by the TID Early Career Network was conducted on hot topics in TID to explore these innovations. Based on these discussions and expert opinion, this article examines the use of artificial intelligence, xenotransplantation, personalized medicine, advanced diagnostics, novel education models, and the use of social media in TID. In addition, the authors highlight the challenges that limit the application of some of these advancements, as well as opportunities for future development in these areas.

Background/Objectives: Individuals with immunocompromising conditions are at high risk of developing severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) illness. This phase 3, single-arm study assessed the safety and immunogenicity of the bivalent RSV prefusion F protein−based (RSVpreF) 120-µg vaccine in immunocompromised and renally impaired adults. Methods: Participants were stratified by age group (18−<60-year-olds; ≥60-year-olds) and received two RSVpreF doses 1 month apart (i.e., Dose 1 and Dose 2, respectively). Reactogenicity events were collected for 7 days after each dose; adverse events through 1 month after the last dose; and serious adverse events, adverse events of special interest, and newly diagnosed chronic medical conditions throughout the study. Results: One month after Dose 1, RSVpreF elicited robust immune responses overall and across age and immunocompromised subgroups. Overall, geometric mean fold rises from before to 1 month after Dose 1 were high for RSV A and RSV B (8.3 and 9.0, respectively); no additional increases 1 month after Dose 2 (7.5 and 7.8) were observed. The most frequent local reaction was pain at the injection site, which was more common after Dose 2 than after Dose 1. The most frequent systemic event after any dose was fatigue. Most local reactions and systemic events were mild or moderate in severity. Adverse event and serious adverse event rates were 13.5% and 7.3% among 18−<60-year-olds and 22.4% and 14.0% among ≥60-year-olds, respectively. Conclusions: A single dose of the RSVpreF vaccine conferred robust immune responses in immunocompromised and renally impaired adults with no safety concerns. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05842967).

Following our previous experience with cardiac xenotransplantation of a genetically modified porcine heart into a live human, we sought to achieve improved results by selecting a healthier recipient and through more sensitive donor screening for potential zoonotic pathogens. Here we transplanted a 10-gene-edited pig heart into a 58-year-old man with progressive, debilitating inotrope-dependent heart failure due to ischemic cardiomyopathy who was not a candidate for standard advanced heart failure therapies. He was maintained on a costimulation (anti-CD40L, Tegoprubart) blockade-based immunomodulatory regimen. The xenograft initially functioned well, with excellent systolic and diastolic function during the first several weeks posttransplantation. Subsequently, the xenograft developed rapidly progressing diastolic heart failure, biventricular wall thickening and, ultimately, near-complete loss of systolic function necessitating initiation of extracorporeal membranous oxygenation on day 31. Given these setbacks, the patient chose to transition to comfort care after 40 days. As with our first patient, histology did not reveal substantial immune cell infiltration but suggested capillary endothelial injury with interstitial edema and early fibrosis. No evidence of porcine cytomegalovirus replication in the xenograft was observed. Strategies to overcome the obstacle of antibody-mediated rejection are needed to advance the field of xenotransplantation.

Background: The purpose of this study was to understand how transplant infectious disease (TID) physicians assess a potential donor with known or suspected infection and describe posttransplant management. Methods: We designed a survey of 10 organ offer scenarios and asked questions pertaining to organ acceptability for transplantation and management posttransplant. The survey was distributed to TID clinicians via transplant society listservs and email. Responses were recorded in REDCap, and descriptive statistics were employed. Results: One hundred thirteen infectious disease physicians responded to the survey, of whom 85 completed all cases. Respondents were generally in agreement regarding organ acceptability, although some divergence was seen when evaluating lungs from donors with influenza, tuberculosis, or multidrug‐resistant Acinetobacter infection. Posttransplant management showed more variation. Areas of optimization were identified: (1) Further understanding of where risk‐mitigation strategies within the donor offer process may improve donor acceptability and therefore organ utilization; (2) importance of recipient considerations in assessing degree of infectious risk; and (3) gaps in evidenced‐based data regarding optimal posttransplant management of recipients. Conclusion: Evaluation of donor offers by TID clinicians is a complex process. Although the survey does not itself serve to make recommendations regarding best practices, it highlights areas where generation of data to inform acceptance and management practices may allow for improved organ utilization and recipient management. image

In this clinicopathological conference, invited experts discussed a previously published case of a patient with nonischemic cardiomyopathy who underwent heart transplantation from a genetically modified pig source animal. His complex course included detection of porcine cytomegalovirus by plasma microbial cell‐free DNA and eventual xenograft failure. The objectives of the session included discussion of selection of immunosuppressive regimens and prophylactic antimicrobials for human xenograft recipients, description of infectious disease risk assessment and mitigation in potential xenograft donors and understanding of screening and therapeutic strategies for potential xenograft‐related infections. image

Bacterial and fungal co-infections are reported complications of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in critically ill patients but may go unrecognized premortem due to diagnostic limitations. We compared the premortem with the postmortem detection of pulmonary co-infections in 55 fatal COVID-19 cases from March 2020 to March 2021. The concordance in the premortem versus the postmortem diagnoses and the pathogen identification were evaluated. Premortem pulmonary co-infections were extracted from medical charts while applying standard diagnostic definitions. Postmortem co-infection was defined by compatible lung histopathology with or without the detection of an organism in tissue by bacterial or fungal staining, or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with broad-range bacterial and fungal primers. Pulmonary co-infection was detected premortem in significantly fewer cases (15/55, 27%) than were detected postmortem (36/55, 65%; p < 0.0001). Among cases in which co-infection was detected postmortem by histopathology, an organism was identified in 27/36 (75%) of cases. Pseudomonas, Enterobacterales, and Staphylococcus aureus were the most frequently identified bacteria both premortem and postmortem. Invasive pulmonary fungal infection was detected in five cases postmortem, but in no cases premortem. According to the univariate analyses, the patients with undiagnosed pulmonary co-infection had significantly shorter hospital (p = 0.0012) and intensive care unit (p = 0.0006) stays and significantly fewer extra-pulmonary infections (p = 0.0021). Bacterial and fungal pulmonary co-infection are under-recognized complications in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

Background: Although there have been many studies on antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in breast milk, very few have looked at the fate of these in the infant, and whether they are delivered to immunologically relevant sites in infants. Methods: Mother/infant pairs (mothers who breast milk fed and who were SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated before or after delivery) were recruited for this cross-sectional study. Mother blood, mother breast milk, infant blood, infant nasal specimen, and infant stool was tested for IgA and IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike trimer. Results: Thirty-one mother/infant pairs were recruited. Breast milk fed infants acquired systemic anti-spike IgG antibodies only if their mothers were vaccinated antepartum (100% Antepartum; 0% Postpartum; P<0.0001). Breast milk fed infants acquired mucosal anti-spike IgG antibodies (in the nose) only if their mothers were vaccinated antepartum (89% Antepartum; 0% Postpartum; P<0.0001). None of the infants in either group had anti-spike IgA in the blood. Surprisingly, 33% of the infants whose mothers were vaccinated antepartum had high titer anti-spike IgA in the nose (33% Antepartum; 0% Postpartum; P = 0.03). Half-life of maternally transferred plasma IgG antibodies in the Antepartum infant cohort was ~70 days. Conclusion: Vaccination antepartum followed by breast milk feeding appears to be the best way to provide systemic and local anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies for infants. The presence of high titer SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA in the nose of infants points to the potential importance of breast milk feeding early in life for maternal transfer of mucosal IgA antibodies. Expectant mothers should consider becoming vaccinated antepartum and consider breast milk feeding for optimal transfer of systemic and mucosal antibodies to their infants.