Margaret Holmes-Rovner
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Margaret Holmes-Rovner has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
David R. Rovner
1 shared publicationG Padonu
1 shared publicationGeorgia Padonu
1 shared publicationGeraldine Talarczyk
1 shared publicationJill Kroll
1 shared publicationM C Dodson
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 March 1999
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 37 (3) , 270-284
Patient Decision Support Intervention
Patient Decision Support (PDS) tools assist patients in using medical evidence to make choices consistent that are with their values and in using evidence about consequences of medical alternatives. To evaluate a PDS intervention for perimenopausal hormone replacement therapy. We assessed the impact of the PDS on (1) consistency between the decision to take estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) or progesterone/estrogen replacement therapy (PERT) and the expected utility of treatment and (2) likelihood to take ERT and PERT pre- and postintervention. Content of the PDS was standardized. Randomized trial of three intensities of intervention: (1) brochure; (2) lecture/discussion; and (3) active decision support. Participants were perimenopausal community volunteers between the ages of 40 and 65 (n = 248). (1) Consistent with values (correlation between expected utility (EU) and likelihood of taking hormones); and (2) Likelihood to take hormone replacement therapy. (1) The brochure group was less consistent with the decision analytic model than the lecture/discussion and active decision support groups. (2) Influence on decisions: PDS tools increased the number of women certain about whether or not to take hormones. There were no differences among experimental groups. Of 99 women uncertain about ERT pre-PDS, 65% changed. Twenty-one (32%) decided against ERT and 44 (68%) decided for ERT. (3) More intensive interventions produced modest gains in a normative direction. PDSs using any of 3 formats reduce uncertainty and assist women to make informed decisions. Increased consistency with decision analytic models appears to be driven by better estimates of likelihood of outcomes.
- 1 March 1999
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 37 (3) , 270-284
Patient Decision Support Intervention
Patient Decision Support (PDS) tools assist patients in using medical evidence to make choices consistent that are with their values and in using evidence about consequences of medical alternatives. To evaluate a PDS intervention for perimenopausal hormone replacement therapy. We assessed the impact of the PDS on (1) consistency between the decision to take estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) or progesterone/estrogen replacement therapy (PERT) and the expected utility of treatment and (2) likelihood to take ERT and PERT pre- and postintervention. Content of the PDS was standardized. Randomized trial of three intensities of intervention: (1) brochure; (2) lecture/discussion; and (3) active decision support. Participants were perimenopausal community volunteers between the ages of 40 and 65 (n = 248). (1) Consistent with values (correlation between expected utility (EU) and likelihood of taking hormones); and (2) Likelihood to take hormone replacement therapy. (1) The brochure group was less consistent with the decision analytic model than the lecture/discussion and active decision support groups. (2) Influence on decisions: PDS tools increased the number of women certain about whether or not to take hormones. There were no differences among experimental groups. Of 99 women uncertain about ERT pre-PDS, 65% changed. Twenty-one (32%) decided against ERT and 44 (68%) decided for ERT. (3) More intensive interventions produced modest gains in a normative direction. PDSs using any of 3 formats reduce uncertainty and assist women to make informed decisions. Increased consistency with decision analytic models appears to be driven by better estimates of likelihood of outcomes.
- 1 October 1996
- Vol. 8 (2) , 38-47
The impact of ethnicity on attitudes and beliefs about estrogen replacement therapy among Michigan nurses.
This study investigates how a selected group of Black and White nurses perceived the risks and benefits of estrogen replacement therapy. The Menopausal Health Survey was developed as a mailed, self-administered survey to assess nurses' knowledge of estrogen's effects on osteoporosis and heart disease, and to assess nurses' attitudes toward estrogen replacement therapy. The findings suggest that given two samples of women with different ethinic backgrounds, but similar geographic locations, incomes, educational backgrounds, and health-seeking practices, there are distinct differences in knowledge about and perceptions of estrogen replacement therapy. These discrepancies highlight areas for potential improvement in the provision of health care to minority women.
- 1 October 1996
- Vol. 8 (2) , 38-47
The impact of ethnicity on attitudes and beliefs about estrogen replacement therapy among Michigan nurses.
This study investigates how a selected group of Black and White nurses perceived the risks and benefits of estrogen replacement therapy. The Menopausal Health Survey was developed as a mailed, self-administered survey to assess nurses' knowledge of estrogen's effects on osteoporosis and heart disease, and to assess nurses' attitudes toward estrogen replacement therapy. The findings suggest that given two samples of women with different ethinic backgrounds, but similar geographic locations, incomes, educational backgrounds, and health-seeking practices, there are distinct differences in knowledge about and perceptions of estrogen replacement therapy. These discrepancies highlight areas for potential improvement in the provision of health care to minority women.