Stephen J. Zyzanski

OBJECTIVE—Poor quality of diabetes care has been ascribed to the acute care focus of primary care practice. A better understanding of how time is spent during outpatient visits for diabetes compared with visits for acute conditions and other chronic diseases may facilitate the design of programs to enhance diabetes care.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Research nurses directly observed consecutive outpatient visits during two separate days in 138 community family physician offices. Time use was categorized into 20 different behaviors using the Davis Observation Code (DOC). Time use was compared for visits for diabetes, other chronic conditions, and acute illnesses during 1,867 visits by patients ≥40 years of age.RESULTS—Of 20 DOC behavioral categories, 10 exhibited differences among the three groups. Discriminant analysis identified two distinct factors that distinguished visits for chronic disease from visits for acute illness and visits for diabetes from those for other chronic diseases. Compared with visits for other chronic diseases, visits for diabetes devoted a greater proportion of time to nutrition counseling, health education, and feedback on results and less time to chatting. Compared with visits for acute illness, visits for diabetes were longer and involved a higher proportion of dietary advice, negotiation, and assessment of compliance.CONCLUSIONS—Visits for diabetes are distinct from visits for other chronic diseases and acute illnesses in ways that may facilitate patient self-management. Novel quality-improvement interventions could support and expand existing differences between family physicians’ current approaches to care of diabetes and other chronic and acute illnesses.

Previous research has identified 2 styles of family physicians' focus on the patient's family: (1) using the family history as the context of care of the patient; and (2) maintaining a family orientation with the family as the unit of care. The purpose of our study was to determine whether these styles affect patient outcomes and time use during outpatient visits. In a cross-sectional study, data on 4454 outpatient visits to 138 community family physicians were collected using direct observation, patient and physician questionnaires, and medical record review. We computed partial correlations between the physician's family practice style score and patient outcomes for delivery of preventive services, patient visit satisfaction, and patient-reported delivery of specific components of primary care. We controlled for relevant patient characteristics. The patients of the physicians using either practice style had similar levels of satisfaction with coordination of care and interpersonal communication, and their value of continuity of care was comparable. Patients of physicians with a family-history style, however, rated their physicians lower on a measure of in-depth knowledge of the patient and family but higher on preventive services delivery. Differences in time use during the visit reflected how these styles were manifested during the outpatient visit. The different styles physicians use to focus on the family affect the process and outcomes of patient care. This difference may be explained by the developmental life cycle of family physicians, as younger physicians may be more focused on family history and older physicians may have a more family-oriented focus. Physicians may need to find alternate ways of meeting those patient needs not well met by their predominant practice style.

We examined the variables related to patient satisfaction with the time spent with their family physician during the office visit. Research nurses directly observed consecutive patient visits to 138 family physicians in 84 practices. Analyses examined sequential models of the association of patient and physician characteristics, visit type and length, and time use during visits, with patients' satisfaction with the amount of time spent with their physician. Among 2315 visit by adult patients returning questionnaires, patient satisfaction with the time spent with their physician was high and strongly linked to longer visits (P < 001). After controlling for visit duration, greater patient satisfaction with time spent was associated with older patient age, white race, better perceived health status, visits for well care, and visits with a greater proportion of the visit spent chatting. The physician's discussion of test results or findings from the physical examination was associated with greater satisfaction with time spent for visits longer than 15 minutes, but with less satisfaction with time spent for shorter visits. Physicians can enhance patient satisfaction with the amount of time spent during an office visit by spending a small proportion of time chatting about nonmedical topics, and by allowing sufficient time for exchange with the patient is feedback is necessary.

Most efforts to improve health care have been made without a full understanding of the value of a primary care approach. This article synthesizes the observations from the Direct Observation of Primary Care (DOPC) study. This multimethod study of 138 family physicians in 84 practices included direct observation of 4454 patients visits were used to describe aspects of family practice that may provide value for patients. Family physicians provide and coordinate care for a wide variety of patients problems, prioritizing these competing demands on the basis of relationships developed during multiple patient visits over time. They use acute and chronic illness visits as opportunities to integrate care for specific diseases, mental health, and preventive care in ways that are tailored to the specific needs of patients and families. Higher rates of delivery of core attributes of family practice are associated with patient satisfaction and preventive services delivery, and are diminished by forced discontinuity of care. Family physicians prioritize and deliver care according to a broad agenda based on patient needs. These needs are understood within ongoing relationships with the patient, family, larger health care system, and community. This integrative approach includes numerous avenues for affecting important patient outcomes that are unlikely to be optimally met by less integrated models of medical care. Expanding the value of family practice will require the development and application of new knowledge of the core structures, processes, and contexts of family practice, and their effects on patient outcomes.

The content and context of family practice outpatient visits have never been fully described, leaving many aspects of family practice in a "black box," unseen by policymakers and understood only in isolation. This article describes community family practices, physicians, patients, and outpatient visits. Practicing family physicians in northeast Ohio were invited to participate in a multimethod study of the content of primary care practice. Research nurses directly observed consecutive patient visits, and collected additional data using medical record reviews, patient and physician questionnaires, billing data, practice environment checklists, and ethnographic fieldnotes. Visits by 4454 patients seeing 138 physicians in 84 practices were observed. Outpatient visits to family physicians encompassed a wide variety of patients, problems, and levels of complexity. The average patient paid 4.3 visits to the practice within the past year. The mean visit duration was 10 minutes. Fifty-eight percent of visits were for acute illness, 24% for chronic illness, and 12% for well care. The most common uses of time were history-taking, planning treatment, physical examination, health education, feedback, family information, chatting, structuring the interaction, and patient questions. Family practice and patient visits are complex, with competing demands and opportunities to address a wide range of problems of individuals and families over time and at various stages of health and illness. Multimethod research in practice settings can identify ways to enhance the competing opportunities of family practice to improve the health of their patients.

The purpose of this study was to describe, from multiple perspectives, the extent to which community family physicians focus on the family. In a cross-sectional study, research nurses directly observed consecutive patient visits for 2 days in the offices of 138 community family physicians. Data were collected on 4454 outpatient visits using direct observation, patient and physician questionnaires, and medical record review. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and a factor analysis was used to identify subsets of correlated family focus descriptors. On average, 10% of the time intervals during patient visits was devoted to addressing family issues. Other family members were present during 32% of visits, and another family member's problems were discussed in 18% of visits. Seventy percent of patients reported that other family members see the same doctor. A family history was obtained during 51% of visits by new patients and 22% of visits by established patients. Genograms were present on 11% of charts and family folders were seldom used. The presence or absence of a family history of breast or colon cancer was noted in 40% of charts. A factor analysis identified two different physician styles: family history as a context for care of an individual patient, and the family as the unit of care. The latter approach correlated with the patient's assessment that the doctor knew their families. Family physicians show a high degree of emphasis on the family, and exhibit two different styles of family focus in community practice. The effects of these different approaches to family care on patient outcomes is an important area for future research.