Otto Gleich

We used the bromodeoxyuridine technique to study the proliferative activity in the basilar papilla of normal and Belgian Waterslager canaries with and without preceding sound trauma. Without sound trauma, there were, on average, six supporting cell divisions per day in the basilar papilla of Waterslager canaries. This rate of supporting cell proliferation corresponds well with estimates of the rate of hair cell differentiation derived from counts of immature‐appearing hair cells obtained by using scanning electron microscopy of the Waterslager basilar papilla. Thus, supporting cell division appeared correlated with hair cell differentiation in Waterslager canaries. Bromodeoxyuridine labeling of cells in undamaged non‐Waterslager canaries also indicated a very low rate of supporting cell division. In contrast with Waterslager canaries, this low rate of proliferation was not associated with a measurable rate of hair cell differentiation. In both normal and Waterslager canaries, exposure to traumatizing sound induced a dramatic increase in the rate of cell proliferation. These data show that a very low rate of supporting cell proliferation is normally present in birds, but it is not associated with a corresponding rate of differentiation of hair cells. Only an increase above this low ambient rate of supporting cell proliferation, such as that following loss of hair cells, induces the differentiation of new hair cells in birds. The reason why Waterslager canaries do not completely compensate for their inherited hair cell deficit of 30% is not clear, when they can clearly respond to additional cochlear trauma from noise exposure with an increase in proliferation rate. J. comp. Neurol. 377:5‐14, 1997.

Our previous investigations demonstrated that the Belgian Waterslagers (BWS) canary (Serinus canarius) was affected by an inherited sensorineural hearing loss. Compared to normal canaries of others strains, hair cell numbers in these birds were reduced on average by 30%. Since other birds are able to replace similar hair cell numbers after cochlear trauma, we investigated if BWS have the potential for supporting cell proliferation with subsequent hair cell differentiation or if they lack the repair mechanisms known to operate in other birds. In the present study the S-phase marker bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) was used to demonstrate DNA synthesis and thus cell proliferation. We found on average six labelled nuclei per basilar papilla in BWS. This number of proliferating cells was in accordance with previous estimates of newly generated hair cells as based on the frequency of immature-appearing hair cells observed by scanning electron microscopy. We conclude that the division of supporting cells in BWS precedes the differentiation of hair cells. In contrast to BWS we found on average only one supporting cell division per day in normal canaries of other strains. However, this supporting cell proliferation in normal birds is probably not related to a loss of hair cells and does not lead to the differentiation of new hair cells. Our data indicate that differentiation of hair cells after supporting cell division occurs only if the rate of supporting cell proliferation is increased above the normal low level (probably by the loss of hair cells). Since BWS do not repair their basilar papilla despite a 30% hair cell loss (as compared to normal canaries) although they continuously produce new hair cells, we suggest that the regulation of the regeneration process is abnormal.

In recent years evidence has accumulated that birds in contrast to mammals have a great capacity to replace lost hair cells after cochlear trauma. Despite this capacity for cochlear repair, a hereditary hearing deficit for frequencies above 2 kHz has been described in a peculiar strain of canaries (Belgian Water-slagers). Because previous thresholds were determined by psychophysical methods, the origin of the hearing loss could not be identified. In order to determine if this loss originated in the cochlea and if these birds lack the potential for hair cell regeneration, we carried out physiological and morphological analyses of the hearing organ. Our results showed that most of the hair cells displayed severe pathologies. Also, found were small, microvilli-covered cells that resembled forms described during normal hair cell development. Small microvilli-covered cells with small sterovillar bundles have been described as regenerating hair cells in other birds after severe cochlear insults. These observations indicate that adult Belgian Waterslager canaries continuously produce new cochlear hair cells. They do not, however, succeed in reforming a normal basilar papilla. We believe that these birds are a promising model for future studies of cochlear hair cell repair mechanisms.