Konstantin Priesnitz
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Konstantin Priesnitz has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Barthel Brylka
Chair for Continuum Mechanics, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Kaiserstr. 10, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
1 shared publicationJulian Bauer
Chair for Continuum Mechanics, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Kaiserstr. 10, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
1 shared publicationMalte Schemmann
Chair for Continuum Mechanics, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Kaiserstr. 10, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
1 shared publication- Thomas Böhlke
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 25 October 2016
- Published by Wiley in Proceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics
- Vol. 16 (1) , 159-160
Parametric shape optimization of biaxial tensile specimen
Common cruciform specimen for biaxial tensile testing of sheet moulding compound, take damage and finally fail in uniaxially loaded areas. When using these specimen, an observation of damage initialization and failure in biaxially loaded areas is, therefore, not possible. In this paper, a parametric shape optimization is described to find a more suitable specimen shape. The parametrization of the specimen is presented. Objective functions are introduced to measure the appropriateness of specimen. A weighted summation transfers the constraint multiobjective optimization problem into a constraint scalar‐valued problem. Findings of experiments suggest that a specimen shape with straight, non‐tapering arms and slits along the arms is reasonable.
- 25 October 2016
- Published by Wiley in Proceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics
- Vol. 16 (1) , 159-160
Parametric shape optimization of biaxial tensile specimen
Common cruciform specimen for biaxial tensile testing of sheet moulding compound, take damage and finally fail in uniaxially loaded areas. When using these specimen, an observation of damage initialization and failure in biaxially loaded areas is, therefore, not possible. In this paper, a parametric shape optimization is described to find a more suitable specimen shape. The parametrization of the specimen is presented. Objective functions are introduced to measure the appropriateness of specimen. A weighted summation transfers the constraint multiobjective optimization problem into a constraint scalar‐valued problem. Findings of experiments suggest that a specimen shape with straight, non‐tapering arms and slits along the arms is reasonable.