Mircea Chirica

Towards omission of drainage in distal pancreatectomy—the PANDRA II study: another brick in the wall!

Purpose To evaluate the thoracic duct (TD) diameter on CT scan in a population of cirrhotic patients before and after relief of portal hypertension by transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) insertion. To evaluate the association between the initial TD diameters and the cirrhosis severity, the morphological signs of portal hypertension and the clinical success of TIPS. Methods This retrospective monocentric study included 54 cirrhotic patients who underwent TIPS insertion between 2010 and 2020. Measurements of the TD were performed in CT scan at two distinct points: at the cisterna chyli (CC) and at the terminal TD near the lymphovenous junction. Results The mean diameter of the TD was 6.4 mm (± 2.9) at the CC and 6.9 mm (± 1.9) near the lymphovenous junction. After TIPS, the mean diameter decreased to 5.1 (± 2.1) at the CC (p < 0.001) and to 4.3 (± 1.5) at the terminal TD (p = 0.001). The initial TD diameter was associated with the presence of voluminous venous collaterals (p = 0.04 at CC and p = 0.04 junction). The initial terminal TD diameter was weakly associated with the largest axis of the spleen (r = 0.126, p = 0.03) and moderately associated with the azygos vein diameter (r = 0.511, p = 0.001). Initial TD diameter was not associated with Child–Pugh score (r = 0.276, p = 0.08 and r = 0.169, p = 0.7) or with clinical success of TIPS on ascites (p = 0.33 and 0.60) or on bleeding (p = 0.13 and 0.99). Conclusion The diameter of the TD decreases after TIPS, but its initial diameter does not seem to be predictive of the clinical success of TIPS.

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate long-term QOL after caustic ingestion. Background: Caustic ingestion strongly affects patient's QOL but data on the topic is scarce in the literature. Methods: QOL evaluation was conducted in survivors from a large cohort of patients with caustic injuries. QOL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-OG25 module, the SF12v2 score, and the hospital anxiety and depression scale questionnaire. One hundred thirty-four patients (59 men, median age 43) completed the survey; 72 (54%) patients underwent emergency digestive resection and in 99 (74%) patients underwent esophageal reconstruction. Results of QOL questionnaires were compared to average values determined in healthy volunteers and in patients with esophageal cancers. Results: The median QLQ-OG25 score was 44 (34, 62) and values were significantly lower when compared to a normal population (P < 0.0001). SF12v2 scores were significantly inferior to those expected in a normal population on both the physical component summary (PCS) (43.3 ± 10.8; P < 0.0001) and the mental component summary (44 ± 9.7; P < 0.0001) scales. Emergency esophageal resection was significantly associated with higher QLQ-OG25 scores (P < 0.0001), but not with mental component summary (P = 0.3), PCS (P = 0.76), HAD anxiety (P = 0.95), and HAD depression scores (P = 0.59); results were similar after extended emergency resection. When compared to esophagocoloplasty alone, pharyngeal reconstruction had a significant negative impact on QLQ-OG25 (P < 0.0001), PCS (P = 0.01), and HAD depression (P = 0.0008) scores. Conclusions: QOL is significantly impaired after caustic ingestion. QOL issues should not influence the emergency surgical strategy but deserve discussion before esophageal reconstruction for caustic injuries.