AEAlex Ekster
Alex Ekster
*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.
Research Subjects
Alex Ekster has a total of 3 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alexandr Larionenko
Ekster and Associates, Fremont, CA 94539, USA
1 shared publication - Ivan Meleshin
Ekster and Associates, Fremont, CA 94539, USA
1 shared publication - Vasiliy Alchakov
Department of Informatics and Control in Technical Systems, Sevastopol State University, 299053 Sevastopol, Russia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 7 December 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 13 (24) , 13545
Modeling Performance of Butterfly Valves Using Machine Learning Methods
Control of airflow of activated sludge systems has significant challenges due to the non-linearity of the control element (butterfly valve). To overcome this challenge, some valve manufacturers developed valves with linear characteristics. However, these valves are 10–100 times more expensive than butterfly valves. By developing models for butterfly valves installed characteristics and utilizing these models for real-time airflow control, the authors of this paper aimed to achieve the same accuracy of control using butterfly valves as achieved using valves with linear characteristics. Several approaches were tested to model the installed valve’s characteristics, such as a formal mathematical model utilizing Simscape/Matlab software, a semi-empirical model, and several machine learning methods (MLM), including regression, support vector machine, Gaussian process, decision tree, and deep learning. Several versions of the airflow-valve position models were developed using each machine learning method listed above. The one with the smallest forecast error was selected for field testing at the City of Chico activated sludge system. Field testing of the formal mathematical model, semi-empirical model, and the regularized gradient boosting machine model (the best among MLMs) showed that the regularized gradient boosting machine model (RGBMM) provided the best accuracy. The use of the RGBMMs in airflow control loops since 2019 at the City of Chico wastewater treatment plant showed that these models are robust and accurate (2.9% median error).- 7 December 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 13 (24) , 13545
Open AccessModeling Performance of Butterfly Valves Using Machine Learning Methods
Control of airflow of activated sludge systems has significant challenges due to the non-linearity of the control element (butterfly valve). To overcome this challenge, some valve manufacturers developed valves with linear characteristics. However, these valves are 10–100 times more expensive than butterfly valves. By developing models for butterfly valves installed characteristics and utilizing these models for real-time airflow control, the authors of this paper aimed to achieve the same accuracy of control using butterfly valves as achieved using valves with linear characteristics. Several approaches were tested to model the installed valve’s characteristics, such as a formal mathematical model utilizing Simscape/Matlab software, a semi-empirical model, and several machine learning methods (MLM), including regression, support vector machine, Gaussian process, decision tree, and deep learning. Several versions of the airflow-valve position models were developed using each machine learning method listed above. The one with the smallest forecast error was selected for field testing at the City of Chico activated sludge system. Field testing of the formal mathematical model, semi-empirical model, and the regularized gradient boosting machine model (the best among MLMs) showed that the regularized gradient boosting machine model (RGBMM) provided the best accuracy. The use of the RGBMMs in airflow control loops since 2019 at the City of Chico wastewater treatment plant showed that these models are robust and accurate (2.9% median error). - 1 January 2016
- Published by Water Environment Federation in Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation
- Vol. 2016 (6) , 1422-1434
Twentieth Anniversary of the Real Time Sludge Age Control
- 1 January 2016
- Published by Water Environment Federation in Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation
- Vol. 2016 (6) , 1422-1434
Twentieth Anniversary of the Real Time Sludge Age Control