AHAila Jd Hoss

Aila Jd Hoss

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Aila Jd Hoss has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Akshara Jd Menon

    Carter Consulting, Inc., contractors with the Public Health Law Program (Mss Hoss and Menon) and Division of Public Health Performance Improvement (Ms Corso), Office for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial Support, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia

    1 shared publication
  • Colin Basler

    1 shared publication
  • Kelly Gambino-Shirley

    1 shared publication
  • Lauren Stevenson

    1 shared publication
  • Liza Mpa Corso

    Carter Consulting, Inc., contractors with the Public Health Law Program (Mss Hoss and Menon) and Division of Public Health Performance Improvement (Ms Corso), Office for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial Support, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia

    1 shared publication
  • Megin Nichols

    Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta Georgia USA

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    State Laws Requiring Hand Sanitation Stations at Animal Contact Exhibits—United States, March–April 2016

    by Aila Hoss, Colin Basler, Lauren Stevenson, Kelly Gambino-Shirley, Misha Park Robyn, Megin Nichols

    In the United States, animal contact exhibits, such as petting zoos and agricultural fairs, have been sources of zoonotic infections, including infections with Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Cryptosporidium (1-4). The National Association of State Public Health Veterinarians recommends handwashing after contact with animals as an effective prevention measure to disease transmission at these exhibits (4). This report provides a list of states that have used law, specifically statutes and regulations, as public health interventions to increase hand sanitation at animal contact exhibits. The report is based on an assessment conducted by CDC's Public Health Law Program, in collaboration with the Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases in CDC's National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases. The assessment found that seven states have used statutes or regulations to require hand sanitation stations at these exhibits (5). Jurisdictions seeking to improve rates of hand sanitation at animal contact exhibits can use this report as a resource in developing their own legal interventions.


  • State Public Health Enabling Authorities: Results of a Fundamental Activities Assessment Examining Core and Essential Services

    by Aila Jd Hoss, Akshara Jd Menon, Liza Mpa Corso

    Context: Public health enabling authorities establish the legal foundation for financing, organizing, and delivering public health services. State laws vary in terms of the content, depth, and breadth of these fundamental public health activities. Given this variance, the Institute of Medicine has identified state public health laws as an area that requires further examination. To respond to this call for further examination, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Public Health Law Program conducted a fundamental activities legal assessment on state public health laws. Objective: The goal of the legal assessment was to examine state laws referencing frameworks representing public health department fundamental activities (ie, core and essential services) in an effort to identify, catalog, and describe enabling authorities of state governmental public health systems. Design: In 2013, Public Health Law Program staff compiled a list of state statutes and regulations referencing different commonly-recognized public health frameworks of fundamental activities. The legal assessment included state fundamental activities laws available on WestlawNext as of July 2013. The results related to the 10 essential public health services and the 3 core public health functions were confirmed and updated in June 2016. Results: Eighteen states reference commonly-recognized frameworks of fundamental activities in their laws. Thirteen states have listed the 10 essential public health services in their laws. Eight of these states have also referenced the 3 core public health functions in their laws. Five states reference only the core public health functions. Conclusions: Several states reference fundamental activities in their state laws, particularly through use of the essential services framework. Further work is needed to capture the public health laws and practices of states that may be performing fundamental activities but without reference to a common framework.