RPRobert H. Pantell

Robert H. Pantell

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Robert H. Pantell has a total of 27 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Kenneth B. Roberts

    Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

    2 shared publications
  • Kenneth B. Roberts

    Yale University, New Haven, CT

    2 shared publications
  • Alain Gervaix

    Department of Gynecology, Geneva University Hospitals & University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Obstetric, Geneva University Hospitals & University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Children's Hospital, HUG, Rue Willy Donze 6, Geneva 1205, Switzerland

    1 shared publication
  • Benard P. Dreyer

    Department of Pediatrics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York

    1 shared publication
  • COMMITTEE ON PSYCHOSOCIAL ASPECTS OF CHILD

    1 shared publication
  • Carrie E. Nelson

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Procalcitonin in Pediatric Emergency Medicine

    by Niccolò Parri, Robert H. Pantell, Enitan D. Carrol, Walid Abuhammour, Javier Benito-Fernández, Christèle Gras-Le Guen, Alain Gervaix


  • Authors’ Response

    by Robert H. Pantell, Kenneth B Roberts

  • Authors’ Response

    by Robert H. Pantell, Kenneth B Roberts

  • Top Cited Papers

    Evaluation and Management of Well-Appearing Febrile Infants 8 to 60 Days Old

    by Robert H. Pantell, Kenneth B. Roberts, William G. Adams, Benard P. Dreyer, Nathan Kuppermann, Sean T. O’LEary, Kymika Okechukwu, Charles R. Woods, Carrie L. Byington, Jane M. Lavelle, et al.

    This guideline addresses the evaluation and management of well-appearing, term infants, 8 to 60 days of age, with fever ≥38.0°C. Exclusions are noted. After a commissioned evidence-based review by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, an additional extensive and ongoing review of the literature, and supplemental data from published, peer-reviewed studies provided by active investigators, 21 key action statements were derived. For each key action statement, the quality of evidence and benefit-harm relationship were assessed and graded to determine the strength of recommendations. When appropriate, parents’ values and preferences should be incorporated as part of shared decision-making. For diagnostic testing, the committee has attempted to develop numbers needed to test, and for antimicrobial administration, the committee provided numbers needed to treat. Three algorithms summarize the recommendations for infants 8 to 21 days of age, 22 to 28 days of age, and 29 to 60 days of age. The recommendations in this guideline do not indicate an exclusive course of treatment or serve as a standard of medical care. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate.


  • Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Febrile Infants

    by Robert H. Pantell, Kenneth B. Roberts, Tara L. Greenhow, Matthew S. Pantell


  • The Child Witness in the Courtroom

    by Robert H. Pantell, COMMITTEE ON PSYCHOSOCIAL ASPECTS OF CHILD, FAMILY HEALTH

    Beginning in the 1980s, children have increasingly served as witnesses in the criminal, civil, and family courts; currently, >100 000 children appear in court each year. This statement updates the 1992 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) policy statement “The Child as a Witness” and the subsequent 1999 “The Child in Court: A Subject Review.” It also builds on existing AAP policy on adverse life events affecting children and resources developed to understand and address childhood trauma. The purpose of this policy statement is to provide background information on some of the legal issues involving children testifying in court, including the accuracy and psychological impact of child testimony; to provide suggestions for how pediatricians can support patients who will testify in court; and to make recommendations for policy improvements to minimize the adverse psychological consequences for child witnesses. These recommendations are, for the most part, based on studies on the psychological and physiologic consequences of children witnessing and experiencing violence, as well as appearing in court, that have emerged since the previous AAP publications on the subject. The goal is to reduce the secondary traumatization of and long-term consequences for children providing testimony about violence they have experienced or witnessed. This statement primarily addresses children appearing in court as victims of physical or sexual abuse or as witnesses of violent acts; most of the scientific literature addresses these specific situations. It may apply, in certain situations, to children required to provide testimony in custody disputes, child welfare proceedings, or immigration court. It does not address children appearing in court as offenders or as part of juvenile justice proceedings.