Fidelis Akunke Atuo
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Fidelis Akunke Atuo has a total of 43 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Timothy John O'COnnell
Oklahoma State University
3 shared publications Awa Ii Taku
Research Unit of Biology and Applied Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon
1 shared publication- Bethan J. Morgan
Cameroon Biodiversity Association
1 shared publication - Brian P. Dotters
Sierra Pacific Industries, Anderson, CA
1 shared publication E. Tsi Angwafo
Laboratory of Sylviculture, Wildlife, Protected Areas and Wood Technology, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences (FASA) PO Box 222, University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon
1 shared publicationEkwoge E. Abwe
Ebo Forest Research Project, Douala, Cameroon
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 10 April 2026
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Wildlife Management
- Vol. 90 (5)
Habitat selection by stone partridge elucidates the ecological benefits of fire management in an Afro‐tropical Sudan savanna
Fire is a key disturbance that drives community dynamics and ecosystem functions. While natural resource managers have increasingly relied on fire as a management tool to conserve biodiversity in fire‐prone systems, key gaps remain in our understanding of how fire characteristics drive habitat selection and species persistence in tropical savannas. We evaluated the mechanisms through which fire‐created variability mediates habitat selection in a fire‐prone Sudan savanna landscape. Using data from adult stone partridges ( Ptilachapus petrosus ) fitted with radio transmitters and monitored between November 2020 and July 2022, we assessed the role of time since last fire, fire severity, and vegetation characteristics on resource selection by stone partridges at 2 spatial extents. At a broader spatial extent of 20‐m × 20‐m, partridges appeared to select recently burnt areas up to 2 years after fire, but their selection decreased as fire severity increased. Partridges tended to avoid taller woody vegetation that could serve as perches for aerial predators in favor of shrubs (<1‐m tall) with thicket understories that minimized predation risk. At a smaller spatial extent of 2‐m × 2‐m plots, partridges were inclined to select patches that experienced recent fires with high litter cover, while avoiding patches with increasing grass height or bare ground. Our results highlight the important role of low‐severity fires in fine‐scale habitat selection by stone partridges in an Afro‐tropical savanna. Partridge's selection of low‐severity burnt patches suggests an adaptation to fine‐scale alterations in savanna vegetation driven by recurrent low‐severity fires. This knowledge is beneficial in developing effective management strategies that could benefit native species in Afro‐tropical savannas, where fire suppression policies are still enforced.
- 10 April 2026
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Wildlife Management
- Vol. 90 (5)
Habitat selection by stone partridge elucidates the ecological benefits of fire management in an Afro‐tropical Sudan savanna
Fire is a key disturbance that drives community dynamics and ecosystem functions. While natural resource managers have increasingly relied on fire as a management tool to conserve biodiversity in fire‐prone systems, key gaps remain in our understanding of how fire characteristics drive habitat selection and species persistence in tropical savannas. We evaluated the mechanisms through which fire‐created variability mediates habitat selection in a fire‐prone Sudan savanna landscape. Using data from adult stone partridges ( Ptilachapus petrosus ) fitted with radio transmitters and monitored between November 2020 and July 2022, we assessed the role of time since last fire, fire severity, and vegetation characteristics on resource selection by stone partridges at 2 spatial extents. At a broader spatial extent of 20‐m × 20‐m, partridges appeared to select recently burnt areas up to 2 years after fire, but their selection decreased as fire severity increased. Partridges tended to avoid taller woody vegetation that could serve as perches for aerial predators in favor of shrubs (<1‐m tall) with thicket understories that minimized predation risk. At a smaller spatial extent of 2‐m × 2‐m plots, partridges were inclined to select patches that experienced recent fires with high litter cover, while avoiding patches with increasing grass height or bare ground. Our results highlight the important role of low‐severity fires in fine‐scale habitat selection by stone partridges in an Afro‐tropical savanna. Partridge's selection of low‐severity burnt patches suggests an adaptation to fine‐scale alterations in savanna vegetation driven by recurrent low‐severity fires. This knowledge is beneficial in developing effective management strategies that could benefit native species in Afro‐tropical savannas, where fire suppression policies are still enforced.
- 15 June 2023
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Bird Conservation International
- Vol. 33, e65
Modeling the potential distribution of the threatened Grey-necked Picathartes Picathartes oreas across its entire range
Understanding the distribution and extent of suitable habitats is critical for the conservation of endangered and endemic taxa. Such knowledge is limited for many Central African species, including the rare and globally threatened Grey-necked Picathartes Picathartes oreas, one of only two species in the family Picathartidae endemic to the forests of Central Africa. Despite growing concerns about land-use change resulting in fragmentation and loss of forest cover in the region, neither the extent of suitable habitat nor the potential species’ distribution is well known. We combine 339 (new and historical) occurrence records of Grey-necked Picathartes with environmental variables to model the potential global distribution. We used a Maximum Entropy modelling approach that accounted for sampling bias. Our model suggests that Grey-necked Picathartes distribution is strongly associated with steeper slopes and high levels of forest cover, while bioclimatic, vegetation health, and habitat condition variables were all excluded from the final model. We predicted 17,327 km2 of suitable habitat for the species, of which only 2,490 km2 (14.4%) are within protected areas where conservation designations are strictly enforced. These findings show a smaller global distribution of predicted suitable habitat forthe Grey-necked Picathartes than previously thought. This work provides evidence to inform a revision of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List status, and may warrant upgrading the status of the species from “Near Threatened” to “Vulnerable”.
- 15 June 2023
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Bird Conservation International
- Vol. 33, e65
Modeling the potential distribution of the threatened Grey-necked Picathartes Picathartes oreas across its entire range
Understanding the distribution and extent of suitable habitats is critical for the conservation of endangered and endemic taxa. Such knowledge is limited for many Central African species, including the rare and globally threatened Grey-necked Picathartes Picathartes oreas, one of only two species in the family Picathartidae endemic to the forests of Central Africa. Despite growing concerns about land-use change resulting in fragmentation and loss of forest cover in the region, neither the extent of suitable habitat nor the potential species’ distribution is well known. We combine 339 (new and historical) occurrence records of Grey-necked Picathartes with environmental variables to model the potential global distribution. We used a Maximum Entropy modelling approach that accounted for sampling bias. Our model suggests that Grey-necked Picathartes distribution is strongly associated with steeper slopes and high levels of forest cover, while bioclimatic, vegetation health, and habitat condition variables were all excluded from the final model. We predicted 17,327 km2 of suitable habitat for the species, of which only 2,490 km2 (14.4%) are within protected areas where conservation designations are strictly enforced. These findings show a smaller global distribution of predicted suitable habitat forthe Grey-necked Picathartes than previously thought. This work provides evidence to inform a revision of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List status, and may warrant upgrading the status of the species from “Near Threatened” to “Vulnerable”.
- 17 April 2020
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Environmental Conservation
- Vol. 47 (2) , 104-112
Coupling law enforcement and community-based regulations in support of compliance with biodiversity conservation regulations
Summary: The scope and scale of wildlife crimes around the world have risen in intensity and complexity, yet current enforcement strategies have often not delivered desired effects on illegal activities, even within protected areas. Tackling the array of illegal activities by emphasizing law enforcement above other options is challenging and potentially unsustainable. We explored the potential for social norms, community regulations and socioeconomic factors to promote compliance with wildlife laws by interviewing 334 respondents in 28 villages that share boundaries with protected areas in Nigeria. Using an anonymous direct questioning approach, we recorded a high prevalence of non-compliance behaviours in all studied communities. Injunctive norms (i.e., perceptions of acceptable behaviour within a social group) significantly predicted compliance, as respondents with no complicit friends or family members were more likely to comply with wildlife regulations. Perceived likelihood of community-level sanctions played a more salient role than the fear of arrest by rangers in influencing compliance. In addition, non-compliance increased with number of dependents, but reduced with average monthly household income. Our study demonstrates that clear knowledge of the social norms that drive local behaviour as well as the authorities that enforce them is integral to understanding the forces that drive community involvement and participation in conservation. Incorporating local communities in planning enforcement interventions may help protect threatened species and landscapes.
- 17 April 2020
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Environmental Conservation
- Vol. 47 (2) , 104-112
Coupling law enforcement and community-based regulations in support of compliance with biodiversity conservation regulations
Summary: The scope and scale of wildlife crimes around the world have risen in intensity and complexity, yet current enforcement strategies have often not delivered desired effects on illegal activities, even within protected areas. Tackling the array of illegal activities by emphasizing law enforcement above other options is challenging and potentially unsustainable. We explored the potential for social norms, community regulations and socioeconomic factors to promote compliance with wildlife laws by interviewing 334 respondents in 28 villages that share boundaries with protected areas in Nigeria. Using an anonymous direct questioning approach, we recorded a high prevalence of non-compliance behaviours in all studied communities. Injunctive norms (i.e., perceptions of acceptable behaviour within a social group) significantly predicted compliance, as respondents with no complicit friends or family members were more likely to comply with wildlife regulations. Perceived likelihood of community-level sanctions played a more salient role than the fear of arrest by rangers in influencing compliance. In addition, non-compliance increased with number of dependents, but reduced with average monthly household income. Our study demonstrates that clear knowledge of the social norms that drive local behaviour as well as the authorities that enforce them is integral to understanding the forces that drive community involvement and participation in conservation. Incorporating local communities in planning enforcement interventions may help protect threatened species and landscapes.
- 1 February 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Forest Ecology and Management
- Vol. 433, 295-304
Resource selection by GPS-tagged California spotted owls in mixed-ownership forests
- 1 February 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Forest Ecology and Management
- Vol. 433, 295-304
Resource selection by GPS-tagged California spotted owls in mixed-ownership forests
- 5 June 2018
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Ornithology
- Vol. 159 (4) , 901-911
Scale-dependent resource selection and space use by Mississippi Kite (Ictinia mississippiensis) in a heterogenous mixed-shrub ecosystem
- 5 June 2018
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Ornithology
- Vol. 159 (4) , 901-911
Scale-dependent resource selection and space use by Mississippi Kite (Ictinia mississippiensis) in a heterogenous mixed-shrub ecosystem
- 22 January 2018
- Published by Springer Nature in Oecologia
- Vol. 186 (3) , 817-829
Superpredator proximity and landscape characteristics alters nest site selection and breeding success of a subordinate predator
Selecting nesting habitat that minimizes predation risk but maximizes foraging success is one of the most important decisions in avian life history. This takes on added complexity when a predator is faced with the challenge of avoiding fellow predators. We assessed the importance of local and landscape vegetation, food abundance, and predation risk on nest site selection and nest survival in a subordinate raptor (Mississippi Kite; Ictinia mississippiensis) nesting in proximity to two superpredators, Red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) and Great horned owl (Bubo virginianus). All three species nested in trees in a grassland landscape. In this landscape, kites favored upland trees and shrubs, avoiding their more typical riparian forest association elsewhere in the species’ range. Compared to random conditions, kites selected nest sites with high tree density and more closed canopy in the surrounding area. Mississippi Kite selection was not related to food abundance but could be explained by the presence of superpredators (i.e., hawks and owls) selecting riparian woodland for their nests. Nest survival declined with proximity to superpredator nesting sites. Overall, our study demonstrates how landscape structure and superior predators shapes predation risk for subordinate predators. Our results emphasize the importance of spatial heterogeneity in presenting opportunities for subordinate predators to coexist in a landscape with important superpredators.
- 22 January 2018
- Published by Springer Nature in Oecologia
- Vol. 186 (3) , 817-829
Superpredator proximity and landscape characteristics alters nest site selection and breeding success of a subordinate predator
Selecting nesting habitat that minimizes predation risk but maximizes foraging success is one of the most important decisions in avian life history. This takes on added complexity when a predator is faced with the challenge of avoiding fellow predators. We assessed the importance of local and landscape vegetation, food abundance, and predation risk on nest site selection and nest survival in a subordinate raptor (Mississippi Kite; Ictinia mississippiensis) nesting in proximity to two superpredators, Red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) and Great horned owl (Bubo virginianus). All three species nested in trees in a grassland landscape. In this landscape, kites favored upland trees and shrubs, avoiding their more typical riparian forest association elsewhere in the species’ range. Compared to random conditions, kites selected nest sites with high tree density and more closed canopy in the surrounding area. Mississippi Kite selection was not related to food abundance but could be explained by the presence of superpredators (i.e., hawks and owls) selecting riparian woodland for their nests. Nest survival declined with proximity to superpredator nesting sites. Overall, our study demonstrates how landscape structure and superior predators shapes predation risk for subordinate predators. Our results emphasize the importance of spatial heterogeneity in presenting opportunities for subordinate predators to coexist in a landscape with important superpredators.
- Open Access
Structural heterogeneity affects raptor assemblages and niche characteristics in mixed‐grass ecosystems
Landscape function is largely determined by landscape structure. Evidence suggests that landscape heterogeneity often benefits generalists over sympatric specialists. The scale at which animals perceive that heterogeneity likely varies across species and could play an important role in determining the species assemblages supported by different landscapes. In this study, we investigated the relative importance of landscape heterogeneity in the structuring of raptor assemblages in mixed‐grass prairie. We compared niche breadth and overlap of 14 species in two landscapes that differed in heterogeneity. We used a modified line transect approach and distance sampling to determine approximate locations of raptors and mapped these locations in aGIS. We then compared land cover in buffered areas around detection locations to randomly selected locations at different scales. We calculated Outlying Mean Index to quantify niche breadth and compare among species. Species composition was similar in both landscapes, but niche characteristics differed according to heterogeneity. Raptor assemblages were better predicted by land cover composition in heterogeneous landscapes than by land cover configuration in homogenous landscapes. Outlying Mean Index analysis suggested that six of the 14 species occupied marginal niches and narrower niche breadths in homogeneous landscapes. None of these species demonstrated marginality but occupied broader niche breadths in heterogeneous landscapes. Our study provides evidence that heterogeneity is important in providing conditions necessary to support multiple, sympatric birds of prey in mixed‐grass prairie. Species overlapped broadly under heterogeneity but less in landscapes with larger patches of distinct land cover types.
Open AccessStructural heterogeneity affects raptor assemblages and niche characteristics in mixed‐grass ecosystems
Landscape function is largely determined by landscape structure. Evidence suggests that landscape heterogeneity often benefits generalists over sympatric specialists. The scale at which animals perceive that heterogeneity likely varies across species and could play an important role in determining the species assemblages supported by different landscapes. In this study, we investigated the relative importance of landscape heterogeneity in the structuring of raptor assemblages in mixed‐grass prairie. We compared niche breadth and overlap of 14 species in two landscapes that differed in heterogeneity. We used a modified line transect approach and distance sampling to determine approximate locations of raptors and mapped these locations in aGIS. We then compared land cover in buffered areas around detection locations to randomly selected locations at different scales. We calculated Outlying Mean Index to quantify niche breadth and compare among species. Species composition was similar in both landscapes, but niche characteristics differed according to heterogeneity. Raptor assemblages were better predicted by land cover composition in heterogeneous landscapes than by land cover configuration in homogenous landscapes. Outlying Mean Index analysis suggested that six of the 14 species occupied marginal niches and narrower niche breadths in homogeneous landscapes. None of these species demonstrated marginality but occupied broader niche breadths in heterogeneous landscapes. Our study provides evidence that heterogeneity is important in providing conditions necessary to support multiple, sympatric birds of prey in mixed‐grass prairie. Species overlapped broadly under heterogeneity but less in landscapes with larger patches of distinct land cover types.
- Open Access
- 15 July 2017
- Published by Wiley in Ecology and Evolution
- Vol. 7 (16) , 6559-6569
Spatial heterogeneity and scale‐dependent habitat selection for two sympatric raptors in mixed‐grass prairie
Sympatric predators are predicted to partition resources, especially under conditions of food limitation. Spatial heterogeneity that influences prey availability might play an important role in the scales at which potential competitors select habitat. We assessed potential mechanisms for coexistence by examining the role of heterogeneity in resource partitioning between sympatric raptors overwintering in the southern Great Plains. We conducted surveys for wintering Red‐tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) and Northern Harrier (Circus cyanea) at two state wildlife management areas in Oklahoma,USA. We used information from repeated distance sampling to project use locations in aGIS. We applied resource selection functions to model habitat selection at three scales and analyzed for niche partitioning using the outlying mean index. Habitat selection of the two predators was mediated by spatial heterogeneity. The two predators demonstrated significant fine‐scale discrimination in habitat selection in homogeneous landscapes, but were more sympatric in heterogeneous landscapes. Red‐tailed hawk used a variety of cover types in heterogeneous landscapes but specialized on riparian forest in homogeneous landscapes. Northern Harrier specialized on upland grasslands in homogeneous landscapes but selected more cover types in heterogeneous landscapes. Our study supports the growing body of evidence that landscapes can affect animal behaviors. In the system we studied, larger patches of primary land cover types were associated with greater allopatry in habitat selection between two potentially competing predators. Heterogeneity within the scale of raptor home ranges was associated with greater sympatry in use and less specialization in land cover types selected.
- 15 July 2017
- Published by Wiley in Ecology and Evolution
- Vol. 7 (16) , 6559-6569
Open AccessSpatial heterogeneity and scale‐dependent habitat selection for two sympatric raptors in mixed‐grass prairie
Sympatric predators are predicted to partition resources, especially under conditions of food limitation. Spatial heterogeneity that influences prey availability might play an important role in the scales at which potential competitors select habitat. We assessed potential mechanisms for coexistence by examining the role of heterogeneity in resource partitioning between sympatric raptors overwintering in the southern Great Plains. We conducted surveys for wintering Red‐tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) and Northern Harrier (Circus cyanea) at two state wildlife management areas in Oklahoma,USA. We used information from repeated distance sampling to project use locations in aGIS. We applied resource selection functions to model habitat selection at three scales and analyzed for niche partitioning using the outlying mean index. Habitat selection of the two predators was mediated by spatial heterogeneity. The two predators demonstrated significant fine‐scale discrimination in habitat selection in homogeneous landscapes, but were more sympatric in heterogeneous landscapes. Red‐tailed hawk used a variety of cover types in heterogeneous landscapes but specialized on riparian forest in homogeneous landscapes. Northern Harrier specialized on upland grasslands in homogeneous landscapes but selected more cover types in heterogeneous landscapes. Our study supports the growing body of evidence that landscapes can affect animal behaviors. In the system we studied, larger patches of primary land cover types were associated with greater allopatry in habitat selection between two potentially competing predators. Heterogeneity within the scale of raptor home ranges was associated with greater sympatry in use and less specialization in land cover types selected.
- Open Access
- 24 May 2017
- Published by Wiley in Ecology and Evolution
- Vol. 7 (13) , 4782-4793
The landscape of fear as an emergent property of heterogeneity: Contrasting patterns of predation risk in grassland ecosystems
The likelihood of encountering a predator influences prey behavior and spatial distribution such that non‐consumptive effects can outweigh the influence of direct predation. Prey species are thought to filter information on perceived predator encounter rates in physical landscapes into a landscape of fear defined by spatially explicit heterogeneity in predation risk. The presence of multiple predators using different hunting strategies further complicates navigation through a landscape of fear and potentially exposes prey to greater risk of predation. The juxtaposition of land cover types likely influences overlap in occurrence of different predators, suggesting that attributes of a landscape of fear result from complexity in the physical landscape. Woody encroachment in grasslands furnishes an example of increasing complexity with the potential to influence predator distributions. We examined the role of vegetation structure on the distribution of two avian predators, Red‐tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) and Northern Harrier (Circus cyaneus), and the vulnerability of a frequent prey species of those predators, Northern Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus). We mapped occurrences of the raptors and kill locations of Northern Bobwhite to examine spatial vulnerability patterns in relation to landscape complexity. We use an offset model to examine spatially explicit habitat use patterns of these predators in the Southern Great Plains of the United States, and monitored vulnerability patterns of their prey species based on kill locations collected during radio telemetry monitoring. Both predator density and predation‐specific mortality of Northern Bobwhite increased with vegetation complexity generated by fine‐scale interspersion of grassland and woodland. Predation pressure was lower in more homogeneous landscapes where overlap of the two predators was less frequent. Predator overlap created areas of high risk for Northern Bobwhite amounting to 32% of the land area where landscape complexity was high and 7% where complexity was lower. Our study emphasizes the need to evaluate the role of landscape structure on predation dynamics and reveals another threat from woody encroachment in grasslands.
- 24 May 2017
- Published by Wiley in Ecology and Evolution
- Vol. 7 (13) , 4782-4793
Open AccessThe landscape of fear as an emergent property of heterogeneity: Contrasting patterns of predation risk in grassland ecosystems
The likelihood of encountering a predator influences prey behavior and spatial distribution such that non‐consumptive effects can outweigh the influence of direct predation. Prey species are thought to filter information on perceived predator encounter rates in physical landscapes into a landscape of fear defined by spatially explicit heterogeneity in predation risk. The presence of multiple predators using different hunting strategies further complicates navigation through a landscape of fear and potentially exposes prey to greater risk of predation. The juxtaposition of land cover types likely influences overlap in occurrence of different predators, suggesting that attributes of a landscape of fear result from complexity in the physical landscape. Woody encroachment in grasslands furnishes an example of increasing complexity with the potential to influence predator distributions. We examined the role of vegetation structure on the distribution of two avian predators, Red‐tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) and Northern Harrier (Circus cyaneus), and the vulnerability of a frequent prey species of those predators, Northern Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus). We mapped occurrences of the raptors and kill locations of Northern Bobwhite to examine spatial vulnerability patterns in relation to landscape complexity. We use an offset model to examine spatially explicit habitat use patterns of these predators in the Southern Great Plains of the United States, and monitored vulnerability patterns of their prey species based on kill locations collected during radio telemetry monitoring. Both predator density and predation‐specific mortality of Northern Bobwhite increased with vegetation complexity generated by fine‐scale interspersion of grassland and woodland. Predation pressure was lower in more homogeneous landscapes where overlap of the two predators was less frequent. Predator overlap created areas of high risk for Northern Bobwhite amounting to 32% of the land area where landscape complexity was high and 7% where complexity was lower. Our study emphasizes the need to evaluate the role of landscape structure on predation dynamics and reveals another threat from woody encroachment in grasslands.
- 16 May 2016
- Published by National Inquiry Services Center (NISC) in Ostrich
- Vol. 87 (2) , 101-112
Current distribution, breeding population and habitat use of the globally threatened Grey-necked PicathartesPicathartes oreasin south-eastern Nigeria: a call for conservation action
The Grey-necked Picathartes Picathartes oreas is a globally threatened bird species in Africa with a wild population of less than 10,000 individuals. The Nigerian population, which has been poorly ...
- 16 May 2016
- Published by National Inquiry Services Center (NISC) in Ostrich
- Vol. 87 (2) , 101-112
Current distribution, breeding population and habitat use of the globally threatened Grey-necked PicathartesPicathartes oreasin south-eastern Nigeria: a call for conservation action
The Grey-necked Picathartes Picathartes oreas is a globally threatened bird species in Africa with a wild population of less than 10,000 individuals. The Nigerian population, which has been poorly ...