Clint Pecenka

Objectives To evaluate the cost of delivering childhood respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prevention interventions to the health system in Kenya. Design A prospective (cost projection) activity-based costing study. Setting Kenya, national introduction of interventions. Participants Not applicable. Interventions A single-dose RSV maternal vaccine and a single-dose, long-acting monoclonal antibody (mAb). Primary and secondary outcome measures Cost per eligible target population; cost per dose administered; non-commodity cost of delivery. Costs are reported in 2023 USD. Results RSV interventions are expected to be delivered using existing systems: maternal vaccine using the antenatal care platform and the mAb delivered similar to existing birth dose vaccines. Assuming a price of US$3 per dose (for both interventions) and baseline coverage rates averaging 50% for the maternal vaccine and 86% for the mAb, the estimated cost of delivering maternal vaccine was US$1.74 (financial) and US$6.60 (economic) per vaccinated woman, and the cost of delivering mAbs was US$1.56 (financial) and US$6.27 (economic) per vaccinated child. Excluding commodity cost, the cost of delivering maternal vaccine was US$1.32 (financial) and US$2.72 (economic) and that for mAb was US$1.23 (financial) and US$2.48 (economic). Cost differences between the two interventions are driven by the anticipated baseline coverage. Health worker training, service delivery and programme planning and coordination were major cost drivers. Conclusion This study presents the prospective cost of new RSV intervention introduction and delivery in low-income and middle-income country settings, which is largely unknown. Cost estimates incorporate anticipated health system strengthening activities needed to deliver the future RSV interventions. These cost estimates support country-level and global-level decision-makers evaluating implementation feasibility and intervention affordability.

Mozambique has one of the highest rates of cervical cancer in the world. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination was introduced in 2021. This study evaluated the health and economic impact of the current HPV vaccine (GARDASIL^® hereafter referred to as GARDASIL-4) and two other vaccines (CECOLIN^® and CERVARIX^®) that could be used in the future. A static cohort model was used to estimate the costs and benefits of vaccinating girls in Mozambique over the period 2022–2031. The primary outcome measure was the incremental cost per disability-adjusted life-year averted from a government perspective. We conducted deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Without cross-protection, all three vaccines averted approximately 54% cervical cancer cases and deaths. With cross-protection, CERVARIX averted 70% of cases and deaths. Without Gavi support, the discounted vaccine program costs ranged from 60 million to 81 million USD. Vaccine program costs were approximately 37 million USD for all vaccines with Gavi support. Without cross-protection, CECOLIN was dominant, being cost-effective with or without Gavi support. With cross-protection and Gavi support, CERVARIX was dominant and cost-saving. With cross-protection and no Gavi support, CECOLIN had the most favorable cost-effectiveness ratio. Conclusions: At a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold set at 35% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita, HPV vaccination is cost-effective in Mozambique. The optimal vaccine choice depends on cross-protection assumptions.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) among infants under 6 months of age. Yet, in Kenya, little is known about healthcare workers’ (HCWs) knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions around RSV disease and the prevention products under development. Between September and October 2021, we conducted a mixed methods cross-sectional survey to assess HCWs’ knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of RSV disease and RSV vaccinations in two counties. We enrolled HCWs delivering services directly at maternal and child health (MCH) departments in selected health facilities (frontline HCWs) and health management officers (HMOs). Of the 106 respondents, 94 (88.7%) were frontline HCWs, while 12 were HMOs. Two of the HMOs were members of the Kenya National Immunization Technical Advisory Group (KENITAG). Of the 104 non-KENITAG HCWs, only 41 (39.4%) had heard about RSV disease, and 38/41 (92.7%) felt that pregnant women should be vaccinated against RSV. Most participants would recommend a single-dose vaccine schedule (n = 62, 58.5%) for maximal adherence and compliance (n = 38/62, 61.3%), single dose/device vaccines (n = 50/86, 58.1%) to prevent wastage and contamination, and maternal vaccination through antenatal care clinics (n = 53, 50%). We found the need for increased knowledge about RSV disease and prevention among Kenyan HCWs.