Jeffrey K. Lange

Background: Previous research has underscored the benefits of geriatrician consultation in improving outcomes for older patients undergoing hip fracture repair, highlighting enhanced functional outcomes and reduced morbidity. However, the impact of geriatrician care in outcomes for patients undergoing elective total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has yet to be described. We aimed to determine whether preoperative or postoperative geriatrician involvement was associated with differences in the length of hospital stay and emergency department (ED) visits after TJA. Methods: This retrospective cohort study screened the medical records of patients ≥65 years of age undergoing primary elective TJA in a network of tertiary hospitals. Geriatrician consultations occurring within a period spanning 90 days before to 90 days after TJA were recorded. Bivariate analysis and multivariable regression models were used to assess the relationship between receiving these consultations and changes in the length of stay and ED visits. Results: A total of 16,076 patients undergoing primary TJA were included. Of these surgical procedures, 9,677 (60.2%) were total knee arthroplasties and 6,087 (37.9%) were total hip arthroplasties; 1,416 (8.8%) of cases had geriatrician visits. Patients had lower odds of requiring postoperative ED visits when they had at least 1 geriatrician appointment within the week preceding an arthroplasty (odds ratio [OR], 0.97 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.68 to 0.99]; p = 0.005). This effect was most notable for 65-year-old patients (OR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.98]). Conclusion: This study reports promising evidence supporting the benefits of perioperative geriatrician visits on TJA outcomes. Preoperative visits were shown to be associated with decreased odds of ED visits after TJA in patients for up to 90 days postoperatively. Thus, geriatrician involvement in elective TJAs has the potential to improve outcomes and reduce morbidity and costs for patients and reduce costs for surgeons and institutions. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Introduction While total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is typically implemented in patients > 65 years old, young patients may need to undergo TKA for pain relief and functional improvement. Current data are limited by older cohorts and short-term survival rates. This study aimed to examine a large sample size of patients with degenerative and inflammatory conditions who underwent primary TKA at a young (≤ 40) age to identify predictors of reoperation, as well 15-year survivorship. Materials and methods A retrospective study was performed on 77 patients (92 surgeries) who underwent primary TKA at ≤ 40 years old, between January 1990 and January 2020. Patient charts were reviewed and a multivariable logistic regression model identified independent predictors of reoperation. Kaplan-Meier analysis was employed to build survival curves and log-rank tests analyzed survival between groups. Results Of the 77 patients, the median age at the time of surgery was 35.7 years (IQR: 31.2–38.7) and median follow-up time was 6.88 years. Twenty-one (22.8%) primary TKAs underwent 24 reoperations, most commonly due to stiffness (n = 9, 32.1%) and infection (n = 13, 46.4%) more significantly in the OA group (p = 0.049). There were no independent predictors of reoperation in multivariable analysis, and 15-year revision-free survivorship after TKA did not differ by indication (77.3% for OA/PTOA vs. 96.7% for autoimmune, p = 0.09) or between ≤ 30 and 31–40 year age groups (94.7% vs. 83.6%, p = 0.55). Conclusions In this cohort of patients ≤ 40 years old, revision-free survival was comparable to that reported in the literature for older TKA patients with osteoarthritis/autoimmune conditions (81–94% at 15-years). Though nearly a quarter of TKAs required reoperation and causes of secondary surgery differed between degenerative and inflammatory arthritis patients, there were no significant predictors of increased reoperation rate. Very young patients ≤ 30 years old did not have an increased risk of revision compared to those aged 31–40 years.

Background: Clinical guidelines for performing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) have not been uniformly adopted in practice because research has suggested that they may foster inequities in surgical access, potentially disadvantaging minority sociodemographic groups. The aim of this study was to assess whether undergoing TJA without meeting clinical guidelines affects complication risk and leads to disparities in postoperative outcomes. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the records of 11,611 adult patients who underwent primary TJA from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020, at an academic hospital network. Based on self-reported race and ethnicity, 89.5% of patients were White, 3.5% were Black, 2.9% were Hispanic, 1.3% were Asian, and 2.8% were classified as other. Patients met institutional guidelines for undergoing TJA if they had a hemoglobin A1c of 2 and were not currently smoking. A logistic regression model was utilized to identify factors associated with complications, and a mixed-effects model was utilized to identify factors associated with not meeting guidelines for undergoing TJA. Results: During the study period, 11% (1,274) of the 11,611 adults who underwent primary TJA did not meet clinical guidelines. Compared with the group who met guidelines, the group who did not had higher proportions of Black patients (3.2% versus 6.0%; p < 0.001) and Hispanic patients (2.7% versus 4.6%; p < 0.001). An increased risk of not meeting guidelines at the time of surgery was demonstrated among Black patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.60 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.22 to 2.10]; p = 0.001) and patients insured by Medicaid (OR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.26 to 2.44]; p = 0.001) or Medicare (OR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.06 to 1.41]; p = 0.007). Patients who did not meet guidelines had a higher risk of reoperation than those who met guidelines (7.7% [98] versus 5.9% [615]; p = 0.017), including a higher risk of infection-related reoperation (3.1% [40] versus 1.4% [147]; p < 0.001). Conclusions: We found that patients who underwent TJA despite not meeting institutional preoperative criteria had a higher risk of postoperative complications. These patients were more likely to be from racial and ethnic minority groups, to have a lower socioeconomic status, and to have Medicare or Medicaid insurance. These findings underscore the need for surgery-related shared decision-making that is informed by evidence-based guidelines in order to reduce complication burden. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Introduction: The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score–Physical Function Short-form and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function are widely used patient-reported outcome measures in orthopaedic practice and research. It would be helpful for clinicians and researchers to compare scores obtained on one instrument with those collected on another. To achieve this goal, this study conducted a linking analysis and computed a crosswalk table between these two scales. Data: The data of this study were collected as part of the clinical care of total knee arthroplasty patients in a large urban and suburban health system. The sample was a mix of responses from nonsurgical (no surgery performed), preoperative (before surgical intervention), and postoperative (after surgical intervention) groups. Methods: This study applied five linking methods: the item response theory (IRT)-based linking methods including fixed-parameter calibration, separate-parameter calibration with Stocking-Lord constants, and calibrated projection; and the equipercentile methods with log-linear smoothing and nonsmoothing approaches. Before conducting the linking analysis, we checked the linking assumptions including the similar content of the two scales, the unidimensionality of the combined scales, and the population invariance. The results of the five linking methods were evaluated by mean difference, SD, root-mean-squared deviation, intraclass correlation coefficient of the observed T scores and the crosswalk-derived T scores. Results: The linking assumptions were all met. T scores generated from the Stocking-Lord crosswalk had the smallest mean difference (= −0.03) and relatively small SD (= 4.91) and root-mean-squared deviation (= 4.91) among the five linking methods. We validated this crosswalk in a larger sample with the nonsurgical, preoperative, and postoperative groups and in an external sample. Discussion: This study provides clinicians and researchers a practical tool (ie, a crosswalk table) to link scores from two popular physical function measures. Given the diversity of patient-reported outcome measures in use for knee conditions, these crosswalk tables would accelerate clinical and research interpretation of aggregating functional outcomes among the patients evaluated for knee surgery each year.