Amanda Tapley

Fellowship examinations in Australian vocational general practice training assess competency for unsupervised practice. Early identification of trainees at risk of failing these summative examinations facilitates pro-active remediation. This study aimed to explore the utility of formative pre-general practice assessments (PGAs), undertaken at the commencement of training, for predicting final summative examination performance. This was a retrospective cohort study. The PGAs included a written, short-answer, five-case Key Feature Problems test ('PGA-KFP') and an Objective Structured Clinical Examination ('PGA-OSCE'). Multivariable regression was used to examine the relationship between these PGAs and standardized scores on first-attempts at three summative fellowship examinations (an Applied Knowledge Test ('Fellowship-AKT'), a KFP ('Fellowship-KFP') and an OSCE ('Fellowship-OSCE'); and passing all three (versus failing at least one) examination on first attempt. Registrar demographics and training-related factors were included as covariates. Higher PGA-KFP and PGA-OSCE scores were univariably associated with higher Fellowship-AKT, Fellowship-KFP, and Fellowship-OSCE scores (all p-values ≤ 0.002) and with passing all three examinations on first attempt (p < 0.006). On multivariable analyses, higher PGA-KFP and PGA-OSCE scores were significantly associated with higher Fellowship-AKT, Fellowship-KFP (p values ≤ 0.016) but not Fellowship-OSCE scores. Higher PGA-KFP scores were also predictive of passing all three Fellowship exams on first attempt (p < 0.001). This study found intensive formative assessments conducted at the commencement of training to be predictive of final fellowship examination performance in an apprenticeship-based model of general practice training. This suggests utility of these assessments for early-identification of trainees in need of proactive remediation both in Australia and internationally. Further research is required to explore predictive utility of less resource-intensive PGAs.

Introduction: General practitioner (GP) confidence in management and diagnosis across the range of dermatological conditions has not been well-explored. Objectives: This study aimed to document Australian GPs’ confidence and its associations in diagnosing and managing dermatological presentations. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study of Australian GPs. Recruitment was through the restricted Facebook group (‘GPs Down Under’) and 2022 Royal Australian College of General Practice conference attendees. Items elicited practitioner and practice demographics, dermatology educational experience, and confidence levels in diagnosing and managing 28 dermatological curriculum areas. Results: Respondents (n = 278) were most confident in managing eczema, bacterial skin infections, acne, contact dermatitis, and fungal skin diseases. They reported lower confidence for nail disease, connective tissue diseases, vasculitis, vascular tumours and malformations, and cutaneous manifestations of internal diseases. GPs reported greater confidence in managing, as opposed to diagnosing, melanoma and melanocytic lesions, premalignant and malignant keratinocyte skin cancers, sexually transmitted infections, and the skin and viral exanthems. Melanoma and melanocytic lesions, premalignant and malignant keratinocyte skin cancers were perceived as the greatest learning priorities. Conclusions: While Australian GPs report high confidence in diagnosing and managing common dermatological conditions, confidence declines for rarer, more complex presentations. Notably, GPs feel more confident in managing skin cancers than diagnosing them, indicating a need for enhanced training in diagnostic skills, particularly dermoscopy. These findings have implications for education delivery.

Background: Direct observation, workplace-based assessments (WBAs) are a fundamental component of competency-based postgraduate medical education. In Australian general practice vocational training, external clinical teaching visits (ECTVs) are key observation-based WBAs. Traditionally, ECTVs are conducted face-to-face, but the COVID-19 pandemic saw the development and implementation of remote ECTV modalities. It remains unknown if perceived educational utility of remote ECTVs differs from traditional face-to-face ECTVs. This study explored the educational utility of ECTVs, including face-to-face and remote formats. Methods: General practice trainees (‘registrars’) and external clinical teaching visitors (‘ECT visitors', who are independent experienced GP observers) each completed a cross-sectional questionnaire following individual ECTVs undertaken in 2020. Outcomes included overall educational utility of the ECTV as perceived by registrars, registrar ratings of likelihood to change their clinical practice as a result of the ECTV, registrar ratings of likelihood to change their approach to learning/training as a result of the ECTV, and overall educational utility of the ECTV as perceived by the ECT visitor. Educational utility ratings (5-point scales) were analysed descriptively. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were employed to examine factors associated with dichotomised educational utility ratings. Results: Response rates were 41% (n = 801) for registrars and 39% (n = 742) for ECT visitors. Most registrars (64.1%) rated ECTV overall educational utility as ‘very useful’; 58.5% and 47.9% of registrars rated their likelihood to change practice and approach to learning/training, respectively, as ‘very likely’. No statistically significant differences in perceived educational utility ratings were identified between face-to-face and remote video/phone ECTVs (multivariable p-value range: .07-.96). Receiving feedback that was focused/specific/easy to translate into action was consistently associated with registrars’ rating overall educational utility as ‘very useful’ (odds ratio (OR): 12.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.26 to19.9), rating likelihood to change practice as ‘very likely’ (OR: 2.5, 95%CI: 1.59 to 3.94), and rating likelihood to change learning/training approach as ‘very likely’ (OR: 3.19, 95%CI: 1.97 to 5.17). Conclusions: ECTVs are perceived by registrars and ECT visitors to be educationally useful across different delivery modalities and formats. The quality and features of the feedback provided appear most important in ECTVs as an assessment for learning.

Background: Antimicrobial resistance is a global threat. Australia has high antibiotic prescribing rates with the majority of antibiotics prescribed by general practitioners (GPs) for self-limiting acute respiratory tract infection (ARTIs). Australian GP trainees’ (registrars’) prescribing for ARTIs may have been affected by the introduction of remunerated telehealth consultations in 2020. Understanding of the impact of telehealth on antibiotic stewardship may inform registrar educational programs. Objective: This study aimed to compare the prevalence of antibiotic prescribing by GP registrars in telehealth versus face-to-face (F2F) consultations for common cold (upper respiratory tract infection [URTI]), bronchitis, sore throat, acute otitis media, and sinusitis. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of data from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study, a multicenter inception cohort study of registrars’ in-consultation clinical and educational experiences. Analysis used univariable and multivariable logistic regression using 2020-2023 ReCEnT data. The outcome variable was “antibiotic prescribed” for new presentations of URTI, acute sore throat, acute bronchitis, acute sinusitis, and acute otitis media. The study factor was consultation type (telehealth or F2F). Results: A total of 2392 registrars participated (response rate=93.4%). The proportions of diagnoses that were managed via telehealth were 25% (5283/21384) overall, 19% (641/3327) for acute sore throat, 29% (3733/12773) for URTI, 21% (364/1772), for acute bronchitis, 4.1% (72/1758) for acute otitis media, and 27% (473/1754) for acute sinusitis. Antibiotics were prescribed for 51% (1685/3327) of sore throat diagnoses, 6.9% (880/12773) of URTI diagnoses, 64% (1140/1772) of bronchitis diagnoses, 61% (1067/1754) of sinusitis diagnoses, and 73% (1278/1758) of otitis media diagnoses. On multivariable analysis, antibiotics were less often prescribed in telehealth than F2F consultations for sore throat (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.86; P=.001), URTI (adjusted OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.51-0.81; P<.001), and otitis media (adjusted OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26-0.84; P=.01). There were no significant differences for acute bronchitis (adjusted OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.79-1.45; P=.66) or acute sinusitis (adjusted OR 1, 95% CI 0.76-1.32; P=.99). Conclusions: GP registrars are less likely to prescribe antibiotics for sore throat, URTI, and otitis media when seeing patients by telehealth versus F2F. Understanding the reason for this difference is essential to help guide educational efforts aimed at decreasing antibiotic prescribing by GPs for conditions such as ARTIs where they are of little to no benefit. There was no evidence in this study that telehealth consultations were associated with greater registrar antibiotic prescribing for ARTIs. Therefore, there is no deleterious effect on antibiotic stewardship.

Introduction Antimicrobial resistance is a global emergency related to overprescribing of antibiotics. Few studies have explored how prescribing behaviours may change as the consequence of changing resistance. Understanding how contextual factors influence antibiotic prescribing will facilitate improved communication strategies to promote appropriate antibiotic prescribing. We aimed to develop and conduct a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to measure how contextual factors influence intended antibiotic prescribing of general practitioner (GP) registrars. Methods Factors included as attributes in the DCE were level of antibiotic resistance, requirement for an authority to prescribe, existence of a Practice Incentives Program (PIP) for low prescribing and supervisor support for low prescribing. The survey was administered in an online format for GP registrars undergoing training between 2020 and 2021. Regression analysis using a conditional logit model with interaction effects was used on the basis of the assumptions of independence of irrelevant alternatives, independence of error terms and no preference heterogeneity. Results In total, 617 unique respondents answered at least one choice set question. Respondents showed significant preference for avoiding prescribing antibiotics when antibiotic resistance was 25–35% or 40–60% compared with 5–8%. There was also a significant preference for avoiding prescribing when an authority to prescribe was required, or when there was supervisory support of low antibiotic prescribing. In the main effects analysis, respondents were significantly less likely to choose a prescribing option if there was a PIP; however, when interaction effects were included in the regression analysis there was a significant interaction between PIP and resistance rates, but the preference weights for PIP was no longer significant. Conclusions Knowledge about community resistance impacts the stated intention of GP registrars to prescribe antibiotics. The use of the DCE may have made it possible to determine factors influencing prescribing that would not be detected using other survey methods. These findings provide guidance for producing, explaining and communicating issues regarding antibiotic prescribing to GP registrars.

Background: In Australia, a government insurance scheme (Medicare) pays set rebates for a range of distinct general practitioner (GP) services. GPs may ‘bulk-bill’ and accept the Medicare rebate fee directly, or ‘privately-bill’ by charging the patient a higher fee that is partially reimbursed by Medicare. The billing behaviour of Australian GP registrars (trainees) and their decision to bulk- or privately-bill patients is an evidence gap. This study aimed to establish the prevalence and associations of registrars’ bulk-billing versus private-billing. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of data from the ReCEnT study, 2010–2021. The primary analysis used univariable and multivariable logistic regression, with the outcome factor being whether a consultation was bulk-billed versus privately-billed. The primary analysis excluded practices that universally bulk-bill or universally privately-bill all patients. A secondary analysis included all practices regardless of billing policy to provide an overall perspective of billing across the breadth of GP vocational training. Results: For the primary analysis, 3,086 GP registrars recorded details of 316,141 consultations. Bulk-billing accounted for 61.8%, [95% CI:61.6%, 62.0%] of consultations. Significant positive associations of bulk-billing included: younger and older patient age (compared to patients aged 15–34 years, aOR 5.45; CI: [5.06, 5.87] for patients aged 0–14 years, aOR 2.36; 95% CI: [2.24, 2.49] for patients aged 65–74 years, and aOR 4.48; CI: [4.13, 4.85] for 75 years-and-older). Significant negative associations of bulk-billing included patients new to the practice (aOR 0.39; CI: [0.37, 0.41]) and patients new to the registrar (aOR 0.56; CI: [0.55, 0.58]), compared to existing patients of the registrar and practice; and practices with lesser socio-economic disadvantage (aOR 0.91; CI: [0.89, 0.93] per decile decrease in socioeconomic disadvantage). Bulk-billed consultations were positively associated with arranging patient follow-up (with the registrar aOR 1.06; CI: [1.03, 1.09]; or with another GP in the practice aOR 1.40; CI: [1.33, 1.46]). Conclusions: Registrar billing decisions may, in part, reflect government bulk-billing incentives but our findings suggest other factors may contribute, including the provision of affordable care recognising patient need (children and elderly, and those living in areas of greater socioeconomic disadvantage) and continuity of care. Further research is needed to better understand how, and why, registrars make billing decisions.

BACKGROUND Antimicrobial resistance is a global threat. Australia has high antibiotic prescribing rates with the majority of antibiotics prescribed by general practitioners (GPs) for self-limiting acute respiratory tract infection (ARTIs). Australian GP trainees’ (registrars’) prescribing for ARTIs may have been affected by the introduction of remunerated telehealth consultations in 2020. Understanding of the impact of telehealth on antibiotic stewardship may inform registrar educational programs. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare the prevalence of antibiotic prescribing by GP registrars in telehealth versus face-to-face (F2F) consultations for common cold (upper respiratory tract infection [URTI]), bronchitis, sore throat, acute otitis media, and sinusitis. METHODS A cross-sectional analysis of data from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study, a multicenter inception cohort study of registrars’ in-consultation clinical and educational experiences. Analysis used univariable and multivariable logistic regression using 2020-2023 ReCEnT data. The outcome variable was “antibiotic prescribed” for new presentations of URTI, acute sore throat, acute bronchitis, acute sinusitis, and acute otitis media. The study factor was consultation type (telehealth or F2F). RESULTS A total of 2392 registrars participated (response rate=93.4%). The proportions of diagnoses that were managed via telehealth were 25% (5283/21384) overall, 19% (641/3327) for acute sore throat, 29% (3733/12773) for URTI, 21% (364/1772), for acute bronchitis, 4.1% (72/1758) for acute otitis media, and 27% (473/1754) for acute sinusitis. Antibiotics were prescribed for 51% (1685/3327) of sore throat diagnoses, 6.9% (880/12773) of URTI diagnoses, 64% (1140/1772) of bronchitis diagnoses, 61% (1067/1754) of sinusitis diagnoses, and 73% (1278/1758) of otitis media diagnoses. On multivariable analysis, antibiotics were less often prescribed in telehealth than F2F consultations for sore throat (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.86; P=.001), URTI (adjusted OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.51-0.81; P<.001), and otitis media (adjusted OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26-0.84; P=.01). There were no significant differences for acute bronchitis (adjusted OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.79-1.45; P=.66) or acute sinusitis (adjusted OR 1, 95% CI 0.76-1.32; P=.99). CONCLUSIONS GP registrars are less likely to prescribe antibiotics for sore throat, URTI, and otitis media when seeing patients by telehealth versus F2F. Understanding the reason for this difference is essential to help guide educational efforts aimed at decreasing antibiotic prescribing by GPs for conditions such as ARTIs where they are of little to no benefit. There was no evidence in this study that telehealth consultations were associated with greater registrar antibiotic prescribing for ARTIs. Therefore, there is no deleterious effect on antibiotic stewardship. CLINICALTRIAL

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of a multi-component educational program aimed at improving general practitioner (GP) trainees’ (registrars') deprescribing in patients 65 years and over. The hypothesis was that an educational program would increase registrars' deprescribing of potentially inappropriate medicines (PIMs) in older patients, relative to a control group, six months post-education. Design: This was a pragmatic, non-randomised, non-equivalent control group design nested within an ongoing cohort study of registrars' practice (the ReCEnT study). The program consisted of an online module, face-to-face sessions for registrars, webinars for their supervisors, and facilitation of the registrar–supervisor dyad, including case-based discussions of deprescribing in teaching meetings. The program was underpinned by the Behaviour Change Wheel framework and delivered to registrars of a single registrar educational/training organisation (other educational/training organisations served as controls). Primary outcome measures were deprescribing any medicines and deprescribing medicines categorised as PIMs. Secondary outcomes were deprescribing of medications taken for three months or more and dose reduction with a view to deprescribing (cessation). Findings: Data from 779 education-receiving registrars and 438 control registrars were analysed. Intervention group registrars showed no significant increase in deprescribing of any medication compared to controls (interaction aOR 1.00 (95%CI 0.69, 1.46) or of PIMs (aOR 1.29 (95%CI 0.74, 2.24), or significant changes in secondary outcomes. Research implications: Despite no differences in prescribing, in this analysis, six months post-intervention, aspects of the findings suggest extended observation and further evaluation may be indicated. Practical implications: The continuation of education for registrars around deprescribing of PIMs is essential. Further investigation is required to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the behaviour change approach adopted in this study. Originality/value: The multi-component behaviour change theory-based approach is novel for this educational setting, and this is an initial step in evaluating the approach. Limitations: The major limitation is that randomisation in the study design was not practicable.

Background: Remunerated telehealth consultations were introduced in Australia in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Videoconferencing has advantages over telephone-consulting, including improved diagnostic and decision-making accuracy. However, videoconferencing uptake in Australia has been low. This study aimed to establish prevalence and associations of video versus telephone consultations in Australian general practice (GP) registrars’ practice. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of data from 2020 to 2021 (three 6-monthly data-collection rounds) from the Registrars Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study. GP registrars record details of 60 consecutive consultations every 6-month term, for a total of 3 terms. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were performed within the Generalized Estimating Equations framework with the outcome video versus telephone. Results: 102,286 consultations were recorded by 1,168 registrars, with 21.4% of consultations performed via telehealth. Of these, telephone accounted for 96.6% (95% CI: 96.3–96.8%) and videoconferencing for 3.4% (95% CI: 3.2–3.7%). Statistically significant associations of using videoconferencing, compared to telephone, included longer consultation duration (OR 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01–1.03 per minute; and mean 14.9 versus 12.8 min), patients aged 0–14 years old (OR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.03–1.62, compared to age 15–34), patients new to the registrar (OR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.04–1.35), part-time registrars (OR 1.84, 95% CI: 1.08–3.15), and areas of less socioeconomic disadvantage (OR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.00–1.62 per decile). Conclusions: Registrars’ telehealth consultations were mostly performed via telephone. Telephone use being associated with socioeconomic disadvantage has health equity implications. Future research should explore barriers to videoconferencing use and strategies to increase its uptake.

In GP training, identifying early predictors of poor summative examination performance can be challenging. We aimed to establish whether external clinical teaching visit (ECTV) performance, measured using a validated instrument (GP Registrar Competency Assessment Grid, GPR-CAG) is predictive of Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) Fellowship examination performance. A retrospective cohort study including GP registrars in New South Wales/Australian Capital Territory with ECTV data recorded during their first training term (GPT1), between 2014 and 2018, who attempted at least one Fellowship examination. Independent variables of interest included the four GPR-CAG factors assessed in GPT1 ('patient-centredness/caring', 'formulating hypotheses/management plans', 'professional responsibilities', 'physical examination skills'). Outcomes of interest included individual scores of the three summative examinations (Applied Knowledge Test (AKT); Key Feature Problem (KFP); and the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)) and overall Pass/Fail status. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed. Univariably, there were statistically significant associations (p < 0.01) between all four GPR-CAG factors and all four summative examination outcomes, except for 'formulating hypotheses/management plans' and OSCE score (p = 0.07). On multivariable analysis, each factor was significantly associated (p < 0.05) with at least one exam outcome, and 'physical examination skills' was significantly associated (p < 0.05) with all four exam outcomes. ECTV performance, via GPR-CAG scores, is predictive of RACGP Fellowship exam performance. The univariable findings highlight the pragmatic utility of ECTVs in flagging registrars who are at-risk of poor exam performance, facilitating early intervention. The multivariable associations of GPR-CAG scores and examination performance suggest that these scores provide predictive ability beyond that of other known predictors.