Alisa Pankova
Alisa Pankova has a total of 18 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Peeter Laud
Cybernetica AS, Mäealuse 2/1, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia
7 shared publications - Marlon Dumas
University of Tartu
6 shared publications - Gamal Elkoumy
University of Tartu Tartu Estonia
4 shared publications - Martin Pettai
Cybernetica AS
3 shared publications - Aivo Toots
Cybernetica AS, Tallinn, Estonia
2 shared publications - Joosep Jääger
Cybernetica Estonia
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Privacy-preserving server-supported decryption
In this paper, we consider encryption systems with two-out-of-two threshold decryption, where one of the parties (the client) initiates the decryption and the other one (the server) assists. Existing threshold decryption schemes disclose to the server the ciphertext that is being decrypted. We give a construction, where the identity of the ciphertext is not leaked to the server, and the client's privacy is thus preserved. While showing the security of this construction, we run into the issue of defining the security of a scheme with blindly assisted decryption. We discuss previously proposed security definitions for similar cryptographic functionalities and argue why they do not capture the expected meaning of security. We propose an ideal functionality for the encryption with server-supported blind threshold decryption in the universal composability model, carefully balancing between the meaning of privacy, and the ability to implement it. We construct a protocol and show that it is a secure implementation of the proposed functionality in the random oracle model.
Open AccessPrivacy-preserving server-supported decryption
In this paper, we consider encryption systems with two-out-of-two threshold decryption, where one of the parties (the client) initiates the decryption and the other one (the server) assists. Existing threshold decryption schemes disclose to the server the ciphertext that is being decrypted. We give a construction, where the identity of the ciphertext is not leaked to the server, and the client's privacy is thus preserved. While showing the security of this construction, we run into the issue of defining the security of a scheme with blindly assisted decryption. We discuss previously proposed security definitions for similar cryptographic functionalities and argue why they do not capture the expected meaning of security. We propose an ideal functionality for the encryption with server-supported blind threshold decryption in the universal composability model, carefully balancing between the meaning of privacy, and the ability to implement it. We construct a protocol and show that it is a secure implementation of the proposed functionality in the random oracle model.
- Open Access
Differentially Private Release of Event Logs for Process Mining
The applicability of process mining techniques hinges on the availability of event logs capturing the execution of a business process. In some use cases, particularly those involving customer-facing processes, these event logs may contain private information. Data protection regulations restrict the use of such event logs for analysis purposes. One way of circumventing these restrictions is to anonymize the event log to the extent that no individual can be singled out using the anonymized log. This article addresses the problem of anonymizing an event log in order to guarantee that, upon release of the anonymized log, the probability that an attacker may single out any individual represented in the original log does not increase by more than a threshold. The article proposes a differentially private release mechanism, which samples the cases in the log and adds noise to the timestamps to the extent required to achieve the above privacy guarantee. The article reports on an empirical comparison of the proposed approach against the state-of-the-art approaches using 14 real-life event logs in terms of data utility loss and computational efficiency.
Open AccessDifferentially Private Release of Event Logs for Process Mining
The applicability of process mining techniques hinges on the availability of event logs capturing the execution of a business process. In some use cases, particularly those involving customer-facing processes, these event logs may contain private information. Data protection regulations restrict the use of such event logs for analysis purposes. One way of circumventing these restrictions is to anonymize the event log to the extent that no individual can be singled out using the anonymized log. This article addresses the problem of anonymizing an event log in order to guarantee that, upon release of the anonymized log, the probability that an attacker may single out any individual represented in the original log does not increase by more than a threshold. The article proposes a differentially private release mechanism, which samples the cases in the log and adds noise to the timestamps to the extent required to achieve the above privacy guarantee. The article reports on an empirical comparison of the proposed approach against the state-of-the-art approaches using 14 real-life event logs in terms of data utility loss and computational efficiency.
- 18 June 2022
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 313-333
Relations Between Privacy, Verifiability, Accountability and Coercion-Resistance in Voting Protocols
- 18 June 2022
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 313-333
Relations Between Privacy, Verifiability, Accountability and Coercion-Resistance in Voting Protocols
- Open Access
Mine Me but Don't Single Me Out: Differentially Private Event Logs for Process Mining
The applicability of process mining techniques hinges on the availability of event logs capturing the execution of a business process. In some use cases, particularly those involving customer-facing processes, these event logs may contain private information. Data protection regulations restrict the use of such event logs for analysis purposes. One way of circumventing these restrictions is to anonymize the event log to the extent that no individual can be singled out using the anonymized log. This paper addresses the problem of anonymizing an event log in order to guarantee that, upon disclosure of the anonymized log, the probability that an attacker may single out any individual represented in the original log, does not increase by more than a threshold. The paper proposes a differentially private disclosure mechanism, which oversamples the cases in the log and adds noise to the timestamps to the extent required to achieve the above privacy guarantee. The paper reports on an empirical evaluation of the proposed approach using 14 real-life event logs in terms of data utility loss and computational efficiency.
Open AccessMine Me but Don't Single Me Out: Differentially Private Event Logs for Process Mining
The applicability of process mining techniques hinges on the availability of event logs capturing the execution of a business process. In some use cases, particularly those involving customer-facing processes, these event logs may contain private information. Data protection regulations restrict the use of such event logs for analysis purposes. One way of circumventing these restrictions is to anonymize the event log to the extent that no individual can be singled out using the anonymized log. This paper addresses the problem of anonymizing an event log in order to guarantee that, upon disclosure of the anonymized log, the probability that an attacker may single out any individual represented in the original log, does not increase by more than a threshold. The paper proposes a differentially private disclosure mechanism, which oversamples the cases in the log and adds noise to the timestamps to the extent required to achieve the above privacy guarantee. The paper reports on an empirical evaluation of the proposed approach using 14 real-life event logs in terms of data utility loss and computational efficiency.
- 21 July 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
- Vol. 24 (2) , 183-203
Multi-level privacy analysis of business processes: the Pleak toolset
- 21 July 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
- Vol. 24 (2) , 183-203
Multi-level privacy analysis of business processes: the Pleak toolset
- Open Access
PrivaLog: a privacy-aware logic programming language
Logic Programming (LP) is a subcategory of declarative programming that is considered to be relatively simple for non-programmers. LP developers focus on describing facts and rules of a logical derivation, and do not need to think about the algorithms actually implementing the derivation. Secure multiparty computation (MPC) is a cryptographic technology that allows to perform computation on private data without actually seeing the data. In this paper, we bring together the notions of MPC and LP, allowing users to write privacy-preserving applications in logic programming language.
Open AccessPrivaLog: a privacy-aware logic programming language
Logic Programming (LP) is a subcategory of declarative programming that is considered to be relatively simple for non-programmers. LP developers focus on describing facts and rules of a logical derivation, and do not need to think about the algorithms actually implementing the derivation. Secure multiparty computation (MPC) is a cryptographic technology that allows to perform computation on private data without actually seeing the data. In this paper, we bring together the notions of MPC and LP, allowing users to write privacy-preserving applications in logic programming language.
- 29 May 2020
- Published by Springer Nature
- Vol. 387, 166-181
Secure Multi-party Computation for Inter-organizational Process Mining
Process mining is a family of techniques for analyzing business processes based on event logs extracted from information systems. Mainstream process mining tools are designed for intra-organizational settings, insofar as they assume that an event log is available for processing as a whole. The use of such tools for inter-organizational process analysis is hampered by the fact that such processes involve independent parties who are unwilling to, or sometimes legally prevented from, sharing detailed event logs with each other. In this setting, this paper proposes an approach for constructing and querying a common artifact used for process mining, namely the frequency and time-annotated Directly-Follows Graph (DFG), over multiple event logs belonging to different parties, in such a way that the parties do not share the event logs with each other. The proposal leverages an existing platform for secure multi-party computation, namely Sharemind. Since a direct implementation of DFG construction in Sharemind suffers from scalability issues, we propose to rely on vectorization of event logs and to employ a divide-and-conquer scheme for parallel processing of sub-logs. The paper reports on experiments that evaluate the scalability of the approach on real-life logs.
- 29 May 2020
- Published by Springer Nature
- Vol. 387, 166-181
Secure Multi-party Computation for Inter-organizational Process Mining
Process mining is a family of techniques for analyzing business processes based on event logs extracted from information systems. Mainstream process mining tools are designed for intra-organizational settings, insofar as they assume that an event log is available for processing as a whole. The use of such tools for inter-organizational process analysis is hampered by the fact that such processes involve independent parties who are unwilling to, or sometimes legally prevented from, sharing detailed event logs with each other. In this setting, this paper proposes an approach for constructing and querying a common artifact used for process mining, namely the frequency and time-annotated Directly-Follows Graph (DFG), over multiple event logs belonging to different parties, in such a way that the parties do not share the event logs with each other. The proposal leverages an existing platform for secure multi-party computation, namely Sharemind. Since a direct implementation of DFG construction in Sharemind suffers from scalability issues, we propose to rely on vectorization of event logs and to employ a divide-and-conquer scheme for parallel processing of sub-logs. The paper reports on experiments that evaluate the scalability of the approach on real-life logs.
- Open Access
Secure Multi-Party Computation for Inter-Organizational Process Mining
Process mining is a family of techniques for analysing business processes based on event logs extracted from information systems. Mainstream process mining tools are designed for intra-organizational settings, insofar as they assume that an event log is available for processing as a whole. The use of such tools for inter-organizational process analysis is hampered by the fact that such processes involve independent parties who are unwilling to, or sometimes legally prevented from, sharing detailed event logs with each other. In this setting, this paper proposes an approach for constructing and querying a common type of artifact used for process mining, namely the frequency and time-annotated Directly-Follows Graph (DFG), over multiple event logs belonging to different parties, in such a way that the parties do not share the event logs with each other. The proposal leverages an existing platform for secure multi-party computation, namely Sharemind. Since a direct implementation of DFG construction in Sharemind suffers from scalability issues, the paper proposes to rely on vectorization of event logs and to employ a divide-and-conquer scheme for parallel processing of sub-logs. The paper reports on an experimental evaluation that tests the scalability of the approach on real-life logs.
Open AccessSecure Multi-Party Computation for Inter-Organizational Process Mining
Process mining is a family of techniques for analysing business processes based on event logs extracted from information systems. Mainstream process mining tools are designed for intra-organizational settings, insofar as they assume that an event log is available for processing as a whole. The use of such tools for inter-organizational process analysis is hampered by the fact that such processes involve independent parties who are unwilling to, or sometimes legally prevented from, sharing detailed event logs with each other. In this setting, this paper proposes an approach for constructing and querying a common type of artifact used for process mining, namely the frequency and time-annotated Directly-Follows Graph (DFG), over multiple event logs belonging to different parties, in such a way that the parties do not share the event logs with each other. The proposal leverages an existing platform for secure multi-party computation, namely Sharemind. Since a direct implementation of DFG construction in Sharemind suffers from scalability issues, the paper proposes to rely on vectorization of event logs and to employ a divide-and-conquer scheme for parallel processing of sub-logs. The paper reports on an experimental evaluation that tests the scalability of the approach on real-life logs.
- Open Access
- 4 April 2019
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 306-312
Business Process Privacy Analysis in Pleak
- 4 April 2019
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 306-312
Open AccessBusiness Process Privacy Analysis in Pleak
- Open Access
Achieving Differential Privacy using Methods from Calculus
We introduce derivative sensitivity, an analogue to local sensitivity for continuous functions. We use this notion in an analysis that determines the amount of noise to be added to the result of a database query in order to obtain a certain level of differential privacy, and demonstrate that derivative sensitivity allows us to employ powerful mechanisms from calculus to perform the analysis for a variety of queries. We have implemented the analyzer and evaluated its efficiency and precision. We also show the flexibility of derivative sensitivity in specifying the quantitative privacy notion of the database, as desired by the data owner. Instead of only using the `number of changed rows' metric, our metrics can depend on the locations and amounts of changes in a much more nuanced manner. This will help to make sure that the distance is not larger than the data owner desires (which would undermine privacy), thereby encouraging the adoption of differentially private data analysis mechanisms.
Open AccessAchieving Differential Privacy using Methods from Calculus
We introduce derivative sensitivity, an analogue to local sensitivity for continuous functions. We use this notion in an analysis that determines the amount of noise to be added to the result of a database query in order to obtain a certain level of differential privacy, and demonstrate that derivative sensitivity allows us to employ powerful mechanisms from calculus to perform the analysis for a variety of queries. We have implemented the analyzer and evaluated its efficiency and precision. We also show the flexibility of derivative sensitivity in specifying the quantitative privacy notion of the database, as desired by the data owner. Instead of only using the `number of changed rows' metric, our metrics can depend on the locations and amounts of changes in a much more nuanced manner. This will help to make sure that the distance is not larger than the data owner desires (which would undermine privacy), thereby encouraging the adoption of differentially private data analysis mechanisms.