Janani Reisenauer

The conventional workup for suspected early-stage lung cancer requires multiple visits, anesthetics, and procedures. Single anesthetic event lung cancer surgery integrates shape-sensing robotic bronchoscopy, cone-beam CT, rapid on-site cytologic evaluation (ROSE), endobronchial ultrasound staging, lesion localization, and minimally invasive resection into one operative encounter. In this narrative review, we describe the technical components of this pathway, summarize the supporting literature, and offer expert, institution-based troubleshooting guidance for common intraoperative dilemmas. Reported diagnostic yields for shape-sensing robotic bronchoscopy range from 80 to 96%, with approximately 90% concordance between ROSE and final pathology. Published single-institution series report reductions in time from detection to resection of 15–51 days, cost savings of approximately $3000–$10,000, and perioperative outcomes (length of stay 1.8–3.6 days; complication rates comparable to traditional pathways) similar to staged care. The supporting evidence is retrospective and derived from small, single-institution, high-volume referral cohorts; no prospective comparative trials or long-term survival data yet exist. Single anesthetic event lung cancer surgery is therefore best regarded as an emerging, resource-intensive care pathway for carefully selected patients at experienced centers rather than an established standard of care, pending prospective, multicenter validation.

Autonomous robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has emerged as a promising objective in biomedical technology, further enhanced by miniaturization toward microrobotic-assisted surgery (μ-RAS). This reduction in scale promises minimally invasive, partially or fully automated surgical procedures, with the potential to reduce patient recovery times, lower medical costs, and enable previously unavailable procedural options. This perspective highlights the specific advances in RAS that potentially map to the microscale (μ-RAS), organized across five surgical domains: endovascular, endoluminal, laparoscopic, ophthalmic, and orthopedic. We examine both clinical demands and technological advances in surgical robotics and identify the key innovations required for progress across these surgical fields. Our contribution is distinct in combining the perspectives of both surgical experts and bioengineering innovators, outlining a roadmap for the advancement and eventual integration of autonomous RAS and μ-RAS into mainstream surgical practice.

The VIGOR study was designed to evaluate the pathologic response of soft tissue ablated with pulsed electric fields (PEFs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who are candidates for surgical resection following standard of care (SOC) neoadjuvant use of checkpoint inhibitor treatment plus platinum doublet chemotherapy (NCT05583188). The safety of adding PEF to this pathway of care was also evaluated. The primary endpoint was the pathologic response. Secondary endpoints included the rate of R0 (complete) resection, as well as the frequency, duration, and causes of any surgery cancellations or delays. Exploratory endpoints included the profiling of circulating immunocytes post ablation by flow cytometry. The study enrolled 5 patients and PEF energy was successfully delivered to targeted lesions in the lung. No issues were observed when accessing the tumor for delivery of PEF energy, and no device-related serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed. All patients initiated neoadjuvant therapy as planned. Four of five patients underwent surgical resection. Pathological assessment was performed on resected tumors and revealed that out of the four surgical patients three were pathologic complete response (pCR) and one had major pathologic response (MPR). In summary, this study supports the safety and feasibility of PEF ablation in NSCLC patients prior to neoadjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint blockade plus platinum doublet chemotherapy and planned surgical resection.

Background: Lung cancer recurrence following curative-intent surgery remains a challenge for multi-disciplinary care teams. Currently, tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging is the main determinant of long-term outcomes and candidacy for perioperative therapies. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors beyond TNM staging associated with lung cancer recurrence as well as overall survival following recurrence. Methods: A retrospective institutional database, designed for this cohort study, identified patients who underwent surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and were found to be disease free in postoperative follow-up from 2004–2014. Patient characteristics, diagnostics, and operations were compared by recurrence of disease using chi squared and analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models identified factors associated with disease recurrence and patient survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare 5-year overall survival rates in patients with and without disease recurrence. Results: There were 1,195 patients with NSCLC who underwent surgery with 394 (33%) developing recurrence during follow up. Five year recurrence rates by pathologic staging were as follows: stage Ia 29%, stage Ib 39%, stage IIa 47%, stage IIb 59%, and stage III 57%. Risk factors associated with recurrence included wedge resection [hazard ratio (HR) 1.36, P=0.03], lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (HR 1.55, P=0.01), and visceral pleural invasion (VPI) (HR 1.43, P=0.008). Higher standardized uptake value (SUV) from preoperative positron emission tomography (PET) scans were also associated with higher recurrence rates (P=0.004). Overall 5-year survival for patients without recurrence was 72.2% compared to 47.4% (PConclusions: Approximately, one third of patients experience recurrence after complete surgical resection of NSCLC. Recurrence and site of recurrence directly impact long-term survival. Risk factors for recurrence include wedge resection, LVI, VPI, and SUVmax, which add additional information beyond TNM staging to help prognosticate and potentially improve patient selection for emerging perioperative therapies or clinical trials.

Background: The AFFINITY trial (NCT05890872) is a prospective, non-randomized, open-label, single-arm study evaluating the safety, immunological impact, and preliminary efficacy of Aliya pulsed electric field ablation in patients with solid tumors. Thirty-one patients were enrolled; thirty received lung lesion ablation prior to continuation on standard-of-care treatment. This manuscript reports six-month local control outcomes and immunological response characteristics. Radiological outcomes were assessed using a modified RECIST 1.1, and immunological impact was evaluated via changes in peripheral blood immunocyte populations and detection of immunoglobulins (Ig) to tumor-associated antigens in serum post-ablation. Methods: Twenty-eight patients underwent radiological assessment of ablated lesions at approximately 1-, 3-, and 6-month post-ablation to evaluate local control. Peripheral blood was collected for immune monitoring using flow cytometry and to detect IgG responses to biopsy-specific and tumor-associated antigens. Results: At 6 months, two cohorts emerged: 12 received ablation only, and 16 received ablation plus systemic and/or focal therapies (radiotherapy or second ablation). In the ablation-only group, imaging showed local control in all ablated lesions (8/12 SD, 4/12 PR), suggesting local efficacy without systemic therapy in those patients. Immunophenotyping showed dynamic changes in circulating immune cells, including T and B cell activation. A subset also exhibited modulation of tumor antigen-specific IgG, indicating a systemic humoral response. Conclusions: This analysis provides preliminary evidence that this form of ablation may promote local tumor control and modulate systemic immune function. These findings support the immunogenic potential of this specialized energy and warrant further investigation. Extended 12-month data for the full cohort will be reported in a future manuscript.

Importance: Lung cancer and pulmonary metastases remain the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. While surgery is the gold standard, local tissue-ablative therapies are increasingly used in unresectable disease or inoperable patients. Minimally invasive local control presents a safe, repeatable approach to slow disease progression and prolong survival. Observations: Ablative techniques (radiofrequency, microwave, cryoablation, pulsed electric field) utilize extreme heat, cold, or energy to induce cancer cell death. Traditionally, ablation occurred percutaneously with image guidance, but transbronchial approaches are gaining popularity due to a potentially improved complication profile with reduced tumoral seeding. Stereotactic body radiotherapy utilizes non-invasive, precise radiation with a steep dose fall-off to protect peritumoral tissue. Transarterial infusions via transarterial chemoembolization and intraarterial chemoperfusion are emerging approaches that exploit tumor vasculature to provide focal cytotoxicity and ischemia. Intratumoral injectables (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiosensitization, oncolytic viruses, adoptive cell therapy, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy) directly target the tumor microenvironment, potentially increasing efficacy whilst minimizing systemic adverse effects. Conclusions and relevance: In the age of individualized cancer therapy, a multidisciplinary approach with concurrent modalities can achieve local control. This review provides a comprehensive discussion regarding the role and types of local control, safety, efficacy, and survival outcomes in assessing percutaneous, transbronchial, intraarterial, and intratumoral approaches in nonsurgical patients.

Background The introduction of laparoscopy in 1989 revolutionized surgical practices, reducing post-operative complications, and enhancing outcomes. Despite its benefits, limitations in laparoscopic tools have led to continued use of open surgery. Robotic-assisted surgery emerged to address these limitations, but its adoption trends and potential impact on open and laparoscopic surgery require analysis. Methods A retrospective analysis used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) databases from 2012 to 2021. The study encompassed various abdominal procedures, employing Vector Autoregressive (VAR) models to analyze the dynamic relationships between surgical techniques. The models predicted future trends in open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery until Q2 of 2025. Results The analysis included 360,171 patients across diverse procedures. In urology, robotic surgery dominated prostatectomies (83.1% in 2021) and nephrectomies (55.1% in 2021), while the open approach remained the predominant surgical technique for cystectomies (72.5% in 2021). In general surgery, robotic colectomies were forecasted to surpass laparoscopy, becoming the primary approach by 2024 (45.7% in 2025). Proctectomies also showed a shift towards robotic surgery, predicted to surpass laparoscopy and open surgery by 2025 (32.3%). Pancreatectomies witnessed a steady growth in robotic surgery, surpassing laparoscopy in 2021, with forecasts indicating further increase. While hepatectomies remained predominantly open (70.0% in 2025), esophagectomies saw a rise in robotic surgery, predicted to become the primary approach by 2025 (52.3%). Conclusions The study suggests a transformative shift towards robotic-assisted surgery, poised to dominate various minimally invasive procedures. The forecasts indicate that robotic surgery may surpass laparoscopy and open surgery in colectomies, proctectomies, pancreatectomies, and esophagectomies by 2025. This anticipated change emphasizes the need for proactive adjustments in surgical training programs to align with evolving surgical practices. The findings have substantial implications for future healthcare practices, necessitating a balance between traditional laparoscopy and the burgeoning role of robotic-assisted surgery.

Background: Chylothoraces result from traumatic or non-traumatic insult to the thoracic duct, allowing for lymph to accumulate in the chest. Patients present with increasing dyspnea and fatigue, and the diagnosis is made via chest X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and comparative analysis of the pleural fluid and serum. Management largely entails diet modification and drainage with or without adjunct medications, reserving pleurodesis, percutaneous duct embolization, or thoracic duct ligation for recalcitrant cases. Case Description: A 72-year-old female presented with a 10-year history of recurrent chylothorax. This was precipitated by a rib biopsy in 2013 for concerns of fibrous dysplasia, which was complicated by pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement and recurrent chylous effusion. The patient remained minimally symptomatic despite its chronicity. The lymphatic leak fistulized into her right breast in 2019 to cause significant swelling and exacerbate discomfort. Upon presentation, she noted incessant dyspnea, right arm and breast lymphedema, and exercise intolerance. Initial treatment involved placement of an indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) and interventional radiology (IR)-guided thoracic duct embolization. When persistent, she proceeded with video-assisted thorascopic surgery (VATS) decortication, talc pleurodesis, and ligation of the chylous leak. She was discharged with a drain that remained for one month until sinograms displayed resolution of the effusion. Conclusions: Optimal chylothorax management remains debatable as it is understudied with few high-quality trials guiding treatment. When conservative management is unsuccessful, procedural intervention is often required to minimize morbidity and mortality. A literature review yielded sparse similarities between our case and others, highlighting the irregularity of presentation, challenges faced, and importance of a multidisciplinary approach in management.