Nicolás Arisnabarreta
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Nicolás Arisnabarreta has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
E. Martín Patrito
Departamento de Fisicoquímica, Instituto de Investigaciones en Fisicoquímica de Córdoba (INFIQC), Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba , X5000 Córdoba, Argentina
1 shared publication- Fernando Pablo Cometto
Dpto. de Fisicoquímica, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Instituto de Investigaciones en Físico-Química de Córdoba (INFIQC), CONICET, Ing. Ismael Bordabehere-Av. Haya de la Torre, X5000HUA Córdoba, Argentina
1 shared publication - Gustavo Ruano
Centro Atómico Bariloche - Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica (CAB-CNEA), Av. Ezequiel Bustillo 9500, R8402AGP San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina
1 shared publication - Magalí Lingenfelder
Max Planck‐EPFL Laboratory for Molecular Nanoscience École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne 1015 Switzerland
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 14 November 2017
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Langmuir
- Vol. 33 (48) , 13733-13739
Comparative Study of the Adsorption of Thiols and Selenols on Au(111) and Au(100)
The effect of the Au crystalline plane on the adsorption of different thiols and selenols is studied via reductive desorption (RD) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements. Self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) using aliphatic (ATs) and aromatic thiols (ArTs) on both Au(111) and Au(100) were prepared. The electrochemical stability of these SAMs on both surfaces is evaluated by comparing the position of the RD peaks. The longer the AT chain the more stable the SAM on Au(100) when compared to Au(111). By means of XPS measurements, we determine that the binding energy (BE) of the S 2p signal corresponding to the S atoms at the thiol/Au interface, commonly assigned at 162.0 eV, shifts 0.2 eV from Au(111) to Au(100) for SAMs prepared using thiols with the C* (C atom bonded to S) in sp3 hybridization, such as ATs. However, when the thiol presents the C* with an sp2 hybridization, such as in the case of ArTs, the BE remains at 162.0 eV regardless of the surface plane. Selenol-based SAMs were characterized comparatively on both Au(100) and Au(111). Our results show that selenol SAMs become even more electrochemically stable on Au(100) with respect to Au(111) than the analogue sulfur-based SAM. According to our results, we suggest that the electronic distribution around the Au–S/Se bond could be responsible for the different structural arrangements reported in the literature (gold adatoms, etc.), which should be dependent on the crystalline face (Au(hkl)–S) and the chemical nature of the environment of the adsorbates (sp3-C* vs sp2-C* and Au–SR vs Au–SeR).
- 14 November 2017
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Langmuir
- Vol. 33 (48) , 13733-13739
Open AccessComparative Study of the Adsorption of Thiols and Selenols on Au(111) and Au(100)
The effect of the Au crystalline plane on the adsorption of different thiols and selenols is studied via reductive desorption (RD) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements. Self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) using aliphatic (ATs) and aromatic thiols (ArTs) on both Au(111) and Au(100) were prepared. The electrochemical stability of these SAMs on both surfaces is evaluated by comparing the position of the RD peaks. The longer the AT chain the more stable the SAM on Au(100) when compared to Au(111). By means of XPS measurements, we determine that the binding energy (BE) of the S 2p signal corresponding to the S atoms at the thiol/Au interface, commonly assigned at 162.0 eV, shifts 0.2 eV from Au(111) to Au(100) for SAMs prepared using thiols with the C* (C atom bonded to S) in sp3 hybridization, such as ATs. However, when the thiol presents the C* with an sp2 hybridization, such as in the case of ArTs, the BE remains at 162.0 eV regardless of the surface plane. Selenol-based SAMs were characterized comparatively on both Au(100) and Au(111). Our results show that selenol SAMs become even more electrochemically stable on Au(100) with respect to Au(111) than the analogue sulfur-based SAM. According to our results, we suggest that the electronic distribution around the Au–S/Se bond could be responsible for the different structural arrangements reported in the literature (gold adatoms, etc.), which should be dependent on the crystalline face (Au(hkl)–S) and the chemical nature of the environment of the adsorbates (sp3-C* vs sp2-C* and Au–SR vs Au–SeR).