Esther Ososanya
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Esther Ososanya has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
D.B. George
1 shared publication- E. L. Morgan1 shared publication
- Max Denis
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of the District of Columbia, Washington, DC, USA
1 shared publication - Miftahul Qorib
Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of the District of Columbia, Washington, DC 20008, USA
1 shared publication N. Thirunavukkarasu
1 shared publication- Paul Cotae
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of the District of Columbia, Washington, DC 20008, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 12 May 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 20 (10) , 5803
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Global Public Health and Risk Modelling Framework Using an Environmental Deep Neural Network, Sentiment Classification with Text Mining and Emotional Reactions from COVID-19 Vaccination Tweets
Popular social media platforms, such as Twitter, have become an excellent source of information with their swift information dissemination. Individuals with different backgrounds convey their opinions through social media platforms. Consequently, these platforms have become a profound instrument for collecting enormous datasets. We believe that compiling, organizing, exploring, and analyzing data from social media platforms, such as Twitter, can offer various perspectives to public health organizations and decision makers in identifying factors that contribute to vaccine hesitancy. In this study, public tweets were downloaded daily from Tweeter using the Tweeter API. Before performing computation, the tweets were preprocessed and labeled. Vocabulary normalization was based on stemming and lemmatization. The NRCLexicon technique was deployed to convert the tweets into ten classes: positive sentiment, negative sentiment, and eight basic emotions (joy, trust, fear, surprise, anticipation, anger, disgust, and sadness). t-test was used to check the statistical significance of the relationships among the basic emotions. Our analysis shows that the p-values of joy–sadness, trust–disgust, fear–anger, surprise–anticipation, and negative–positive relations are close to zero. Finally, neural network architectures, including 1DCNN, LSTM, Multiple-Layer Perceptron, and BERT, were trained and tested in a COVID-19 multi-classification of sentiments and emotions (positive, negative, joy, sadness, trust, disgust, fear, anger, surprise, and anticipation). Our experiment attained an accuracy of 88.6% for 1DCNN at 1744 s, 89.93% accuracy for LSTM at 27,597 s, while MLP achieved an accuracy of 84.78% at 203 s. The study results show that the BERT model performed the best, with an accuracy of 96.71% at 8429 s.
- 12 May 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 20 (10) , 5803
Open AccessCOVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Global Public Health and Risk Modelling Framework Using an Environmental Deep Neural Network, Sentiment Classification with Text Mining and Emotional Reactions from COVID-19 Vaccination Tweets
Popular social media platforms, such as Twitter, have become an excellent source of information with their swift information dissemination. Individuals with different backgrounds convey their opinions through social media platforms. Consequently, these platforms have become a profound instrument for collecting enormous datasets. We believe that compiling, organizing, exploring, and analyzing data from social media platforms, such as Twitter, can offer various perspectives to public health organizations and decision makers in identifying factors that contribute to vaccine hesitancy. In this study, public tweets were downloaded daily from Tweeter using the Tweeter API. Before performing computation, the tweets were preprocessed and labeled. Vocabulary normalization was based on stemming and lemmatization. The NRCLexicon technique was deployed to convert the tweets into ten classes: positive sentiment, negative sentiment, and eight basic emotions (joy, trust, fear, surprise, anticipation, anger, disgust, and sadness). t-test was used to check the statistical significance of the relationships among the basic emotions. Our analysis shows that the p-values of joy–sadness, trust–disgust, fear–anger, surprise–anticipation, and negative–positive relations are close to zero. Finally, neural network architectures, including 1DCNN, LSTM, Multiple-Layer Perceptron, and BERT, were trained and tested in a COVID-19 multi-classification of sentiments and emotions (positive, negative, joy, sadness, trust, disgust, fear, anger, surprise, and anticipation). Our experiment attained an accuracy of 88.6% for 1DCNN at 1744 s, 89.93% accuracy for LSTM at 27,597 s, while MLP achieved an accuracy of 84.78% at 203 s. The study results show that the BERT model performed the best, with an accuracy of 96.71% at 8429 s.
- 1 January 2009
- Published by Taylor & Francis in SIL Proceedings, 1922-2010
- Vol. 30 (6) , 971-976
Using artificial intelligence to detect fish breathing stress in remote automated biosensing for coordinated watershed monitoring networks
(2009). Using artificial intelligence to detect fish breathing stress in remote automated biosensing for coordinated watershed monitoring networks. SIL Proceedings, 1922-2010: Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 971-976.
- 1 January 2009
- Published by Taylor & Francis in SIL Proceedings, 1922-2010
- Vol. 30 (6) , 971-976
Using artificial intelligence to detect fish breathing stress in remote automated biosensing for coordinated watershed monitoring networks
(2009). Using artificial intelligence to detect fish breathing stress in remote automated biosensing for coordinated watershed monitoring networks. SIL Proceedings, 1922-2010: Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 971-976.