Natasha A.M.S. Flack

Human-cadaveric material is a valuable resource for teaching anatomy, and a lot of research engaging medical students shows they benefit, in a variety of ways, from engaging with this material. However, more and more students who study anatomy are non-medical. Thus, they may have different educational foci than that of medical students, and, therefore, different perspectives on the value of human-cadaveric material as a learning resource. The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions of science students studying anatomy, in the use of learning using cadaveric material. Two cohorts of undergraduate science students studying anatomy (second-year, third-year) completed two surveys; one at the start and another following the completion of their semester-long courses that utilised prosections (second-year) and dissection (third-year) as a primary way of learning anatomy. Likert-scale and open-ended responses were analysed using a general inductive approach, and common emergent themes were identified. In total, 134 second-year and 77 third-year students completed the first survey, and 80 second-year and 36 third-year students completed the second survey. For the majority of students, their interactions with human material were positive and most of them cope well. Students acknowledged the opportunity and expressed gratitude for an invaluable learning resource. If at first the situation is confronting, with more experience, exposure, and staff support, most students find their initial concerns dissipate. This study identifies key areas of the learning journey that work well and others that can be improved, to better prepare students for learning with human material.

Dissection has long been the accepted method for teaching anatomy to medical students. More recently, some educators have suggested that easier, cheaper, alternative methods are just as effective. But what do the students think? This paper aimed to identify what undergraduate medical students learn, how they cope, and what effects participating in dissection has on them as individuals. A cohort of 267 second year medical students at Otago Medical School were invited to complete three online surveys; before their first dissection laboratory class, after their first musculoskeletal system dissection and following the last semester of studying anatomy. Open‐ended questions showcasing the attitudes, beliefs, and opinions on what dissection had taught the medical students over years two and three were analyzed. A general inductive approach was used and common emergent themes were identified. In total, 194 students completed the second, and 108 students completed the third questionnaire. Students commonly conveyed dissection as an appropriate and valuable educational tool, useful for teaching and learning anatomical knowledge and relationships, appreciating the body in three‐dimension, teamwork, and how to cope with death/dead bodies. The noted effects of personal growth while participating in dissection were highly varied, but in general, impacted positively on the majority of students. This study shows that at Otago Medical School the students also believe that dissection is not only a useful tool to learn anatomy but also that it fosters teamwork, assists professional development and helps them come to terms with death and dying. Anat Sci Educ 11: 325–335. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists.