Kelli C. Dominick

Multiple mitochondrial dysfunctions syndrome 6 (MMDS6), caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in PMPCB, is an extremely rare autosomal recessive childhood-onset neurodegenerative disorder, with only six reported cases to date, most resulting in early mortality. Pathogenic variants in VCP cause multisystem proteinopathy 1 (MSP1), an autosomal dominant adult-onset disorder encompassing inclusion body myopathy (IBM), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), typically presenting in mid-adulthood. We describe a 23-year-old female with compound heterozygous pathogenic variants in PMPCB and a co-occurring pathogenic VCP variant. She was misdiagnosed for over 20 years with early-onset VCP-related neurodegeneration due to a maternal family history of ALS. Her disease began at birth with microcephaly and progressed throughout childhood, including developmental regression, cerebellar and cerebral atrophy, optic atrophy, seizures, spasticity, dysarthria, and loss of ambulation. Initial genetic testing identified only the familial VCP variant. Updated genomic sequencing at age 23 revealed biallelic PMPCB variants, establishing a diagnosis of MMDS6. Her clinical features closely align with previously reported MMDS6 cases and are inconsistent with the typical adult-onset phenotype of VCP-associated disorders. While she shares overlapping features with VCP-related disease (limb-girdle weakness, spasticity, FTD), the timing and severity of her neurodevelopmental findings support MMDS6 as the primary diagnosis. Early mitochondrial dysfunction may predispose her to an accelerated or more severe future VCP-associated phenotype. This is the first report of combined pathogenic variants in PMPCB and VCP, expanding the phenotypic spectrum of both disorders. The case underscores the necessity of periodic re-evaluation with advanced genetic testing, highlights important ethical and familial implications, and informs future diagnosis and management of patients with overlapping rare genetic conditions.

Objective: The purpose of this article was to review the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of clozapine in youth and young adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and/or intellectual disability. Methods: An IRB-approved retrospective chart review of youth and young adults with autism and/or intellectual disability who were prescribed clozapine between January 2012 and June 2020 was completed. Information was collected from 1 year before through 1 year after clozapine initiation related to medications prescribed, hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) ratings. Adverse effects and reasons for stopping clozapine were documented. Results: Fifty-eight patients were included in analysis. Forty patients remained on clozapine through June 2020 and 18 did not. Most patients were prescribed clozapine for treatment of irritability. Reasons for stopping clozapine included side effects, continued behavior concerns, difficulty with blood draws, and improvement in symptoms. For those who remained on clozapine for the duration of the review period, the number of hospitalizations and ED presentations for psychiatric concerns or medical concerns potentially related to clozapine significantly decreased in the year following clozapine initiation compared with the year prior (2.13 vs. 3.48, p = 0.010). There was a significant reduction in CGI-I scores from 3.96 to 2.53 (p < 0.001) from clozapine initiation to 1 year later. There was a nonsignificant trend toward reduction in use of multiple antipsychotics simultaneously from time of clozapine initiation to 1 year later in those who remained on clozapine (38.5% vs. 25%, p = 0.232). Conclusions: Use of clozapine for treatment-refractory irritability in youth and young adults with ASD and/or intellectual disability is generally well-tolerated. Observed benefits included a decrease in number of hospitalizations and ED visits and a decrease in CGI-I score in the year after clozapine initiation.

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is an X-linked disorder that often leads to intellectual disability, anxiety, and sensory hypersensitivity. While sound sensitivity (hyperacusis) is a distressing symptom in FXS, its neural basis is not well understood. It is postulated that hyperacusis may stem from temporal lobe hyperexcitability or dysregulation in top-down modulation. Studying the neural mechanisms underlying sound sensitivity in FXS using scalp electroencephalography (EEG) is challenging because the temporal and frontal regions have overlapping neural projections that are difficult to differentiate. To overcome this challenge, we conducted EEG source analysis on a group of 36 individuals with FXS and 39 matched healthy controls. Our goal was to characterize the spatial and temporal properties of the response to an auditory chirp stimulus. Our results showed that males with FXS exhibit excessive activation in the frontal cortex in response to the stimulus onset, which may reflect changes in top-down modulation of auditory processing. Additionally, during the chirp stimulus, individuals with FXS demonstrated a reduction in typical gamma phase synchrony, along with an increase in asynchronous gamma power, across multiple regions, most strongly in the temporal cortex. Consistent with these findings, we observed a decrease in the signal-to-noise ratio, estimated by the ratio of synchronous to asynchronous gamma activity, in individuals with FXS. Furthermore, this ratio was highly correlated with performance in an auditory attention task. Compared to controls, males with FXS demonstrated elevated bidirectional frontotemporal information flow at chirp onset. The evidence indicates that both temporal lobe hyperexcitability and disruptions in top-down regulation play a role in auditory sensitivity disturbances in FXS. These findings have the potential to guide the development of therapeutic targets and back-translation strategies.

Introduction: Treatment studies in FMR1 knockout rodent models have found that minocycline and lovastatin each improve synaptic, neurological, and behavioral functioning, and open-label chronic dosing studies in human patients with fragile X syndrome (FXS) have demonstrated modest clinical improvements. Findings from blinded studies are mixed, and there is a limited understanding of electrophysiological target engagement that would facilitate cross-species translational studies. Smaller-scale, acute (e.g., single-dose) drug studies may speed treatment identification by detecting subtle electrophysiological and behavioral changes. Materials and Methods: Twenty-nine participants with FXS (31% female) ages 15–45 years completed a randomized, double-blind, crossover study in which they received a single oral dose of 40 mg of lovastatin, 270 mg of minocycline, or placebo, with a 2-week washout period between dosing visits. Participants completed a comprehensive neuropsychological battery and three EEG paradigms (resting state; auditory chirp; auditory habituation) before and 4 hours after dosing. Results: No serious adverse events were reported, and both drugs were well-tolerated. Compared with placebo, there were no overall treatment effects for any outcomes, including EEG, but several modest drug responses varied as a function of sex and age. Lovastatin treatment was associated with improved spatial awareness in older participants and females compared with minocycline and placebo. Discussion: We show that single-dose drug studies are highly feasible in FXS and that patients with FXS can complete a range of EEG and behavioral tasks, many of which have been shown to be reliable and may therefore be sensitive to subtle drug target engagement. Conclusions: Acute single doses of lovastatin or minocycline did not lead to changes in electrophysiological or performance-based measures. This may be due to the limited effects of these drugs in human patients or limited acute effects relative to chronic dosing. However, the study design was further validated for use in neurodevelopmental populations.

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is an X-linked disorder that often leads to intellectual disability, anxiety, and sensory hypersensitivity. While sound sensitivity (hyperacusis) is a distressing symptom in FXS, its neural basis is not well understood. It is postulated that hyperacusis may stem from temporal lobe hyperexcitability or dysregulation in topdown modulation. Studying the neural mechanisms underlying sound sensitivity in FXS using scalp electroencephalography (EEG) is challenging because the temporal and frontal regions have overlapping neural projections that are difficult to differentiate. To overcome this challenge, we conducted EEG source analysis on a group of 36 individuals with FXS and 39 matched healthy controls. Our goal was to characterize the spatial and temporal properties of the response to an auditory chirp stimulus. Our results showed that males with FXS exhibit excessive activation in the frontal cortex in response to the stimulus onset, which may reflect changes in top-down modulation of auditory processing. Additionally, during the chirp stimulus, individuals with FXS demonstrated a reduction in typical gamma phase synchrony, along with an increase in asynchronous gamma power, across multiple regions, most strongly in temporal cortex. Consistent with these findings, we observed a decrease in the signal-to-noise ratio, estimated by the ratio of synchronous to asynchronous gamma activity, in individuals with FXS. Furthermore, this ratio was highly correlated with performance in an auditory attention task. Compared to controls, males with FXS demonstrated elevated bidirectional frontotemporal information flow at chirp onset. The evidence indicates that both temporal lobe hyperexcitability and disruptions in top-down regulation play a role in auditory sensitivity disturbances in FXS. These findings have the potential to guide the development of therapeutic targets and back-translation strategies.

This retrospective chart review examines the safety, tolerability and effectiveness of long acting injectable paliperidone palmitate (P-LAI) targeting irritability in twenty-six youth and transition-aged individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and/or intellectual disability (ID) over a 3-year window. Clinical response was evaluated via prospectively assigned Clinical Global Impressions Severity (CGI-S) and Improvement (CGI-I) scales as well as number of hospital presentations. P-LAI was well tolerated with only 3 patients stopping P-LAI due to side effects. The average duration of P-LAI treatment was 21.1 months. Difficulty with medication compliance was the most common reason for initiating P-LAI. There was a statistically significant improvement in CGI-I, CGI-S and hospital visits and no change in BMI noted. Given the potential difficulty of medication administration in this population, this evidence of safety, tolerability as well as preliminary data supporting effectiveness is an important addition to the literature regarding psychopharmacologic management of irritability in youth with ASD and ID.

Objective: Catatonia is a distinct and severe medical syndrome comprising motor, somatic, and psychiatric symptoms that is reported in upwards of 17% of young patients with autism spectrum disorders. Clinical experience indicates catatonia is often under-recognized in this clinical population. Here we characterize the clinical presentation of catatonia in patients with and without neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) including autism, including the time from symptom onset to diagnosis of catatonia. Method: Retrospective chart review of electronic medical records at a large, academic pediatric medical center identified 113 pediatric and young adult patients with a charted history of catatonia, as identified by an encounter diagnosis or problem list entry between September 2017 and September 2021. Workup, treatments, and diagnoses (psychiatric, neurodevelopmental, and genetic) were identified. Results: We observed a clear and substantial delay in identification of catatonia in those with NDDs (diagnosis after 330 days for those without psychosis) compared with neurotypical patients (∼16 days). Psychiatry involvement was associated with shorter delays. Conclusion: Intellectual disability and autism are risk factors for significantly delayed diagnosis of catatonia. It is unknown whether delayed diagnosis contributes to the difficulty in treating catatonia in this patient population or whether the treatment difficulties relate instead to differential and ongoing biological mechanisms and underlying encephalopathy. Overall, these findings highlight the importance of increased recognition of catatonia symptoms in patients with NDDs and suggest early referral to psychiatric specialists may shorten the delay to diagnosis.