Chad Kliger

Transfemoral (TF) access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may be challenging in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Alternative access through intra- and extrathoracic approaches can be performed. Recently, a facilitated TF access strategy, which involves the use of intravascular lithotripsy to optimize the iliofemoral arteries prior to TAVR, has been utilized. The aim of this study was to evaluate early outcomes of facilitated TF access compared to alternative access in patients with severe PAD. Patients with severe PAD who underwent TAVR from 2021 to 2023 were included in the study and were divided into 2 groups: facilitated and alternative access. The primary endpoint was a composite of mortality, stroke, and vascular complications. Mortality was evaluated in-hospital and at 1-month follow-up. Of 150 TAVR patients with severe PAD, 24 underwent facilitated access. Baseline characteristics including age, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, and mean gradients were similar between the 2 groups. The most common alternative access was transsubclavian, followed by transcarotid. Primary outcomes were numerically higher in the alternative access group (14% vs 8%); however, this did not reach statistical significance (P = .49). General anesthesia use and postoperative length of stay were higher in the alternative access group. Postoperative and 1-month mortalities were similar between the 2 groups. Although the primary endpoint did not reach statistical significance, the numerical trend toward better outcomes in the facilitated TAVR group indicates a potential advantage. Large-scale prospective studies are required to determine the appropriate access strategy for TAVR in patients with severe PAD.

A 79-year-old man with a failed 25-mm CE Magna Ease 3300 surgical prosthesis and of high re-operative surgical risk (STS 8%) presented with dyspnea, NYHA III. Cardiac computed tomography angiography revealed anatomy that was high risk for coronary occlusion with a short right coronary artery height of 6 mm and a valve-to-coronary distance of 2 mm. Clinical Images from Journal of Invasive Cardiology. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) leaflet modification valve-in-valve Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF) with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and severe aortic stenosis (AS) is challenging, yet transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a suitable treatment option in such patients. We compared the periprocedural outcomes of TAVR in patients with an ejection fraction (EF) of ≤20% (VLEF group) to patients with an EF > 20% to ≤40% (LEF group). We included patients with severe AS and reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 40%) who underwent TAVR at four centers within Northwell Health between January 2016 and December 2020. Over 2000 consecutive patients were analyzed, of which 355 patients met the inclusion criteria. The primary composite endpoint was in-hospital mortality, moderate or greater paravalvular (PVL), stroke, conversion to open surgery, aortic valve re-intervention, and/or need for PPM. Secondary endpoints were length of stay, NYHA classification at 1 month and 1 year, mortality at 1 month and 1 year, mean valve gradient at 1 month, KCCQ score at 1 month, and ≥ moderate PVL at 1 month. There was no difference in the primary composite endpoint between the two groups (23.6% for VLEF vs. 25.3% for LEF, p = 0.29). During TAVR placement, 40% of patients in the VLEF group required ≥1 vasopressors for hypotension lasting ≥30 min vs. only 21% of patients in the LEF group (p < 0.01). Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use during procedure was greater in the VLEF group (9% vs. 1%, p < 0.01)—all placed post TAVR. Emergency ECMO use was higher in the VLEF group as well (5% vs. 0%). Total length of stay was significantly different between the two groups as well (6 days vs. 3 days, p < 0.01). Both groups had a change in LVEF of ~10%. One-year outcomes were similar between the groups. All-cause mortality at 1 year was not significantly different at 1 year (13% for VLEF vs. 11% for LEF), and KCC scores were also similar (77.54 vs. 74.97). Mean aortic valve gradients were also similar (12 mmHg vs. 11 mmHg, p = 0.48). Our study suggests that patients with EF ≤ 20% can safely have TAVR with similar periprocedural outcomes compared to patients with EF > 20% to ≤40% despite higher rates of vasopressor and mechanical support.

The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing TAVR varies and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the outcomes of complex and high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (CHIP-PCIs) and TAVR compared with standard PCI and TAVR. Between January 2014 and March 2021, a total of 276 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) who underwent TAVR and PCI at 3 centers within Northwell Health were retrospectively reviewed. Original Contribution from Journal of Invasive Cardiology. CHIP-PCI severe aortic stenosis TAVR

Background: For patients with borderline annulus areas that fall between two valve sizes, overinflating a smaller balloon‐expandable transcatheter heart valve (THV) may be preferable to nominal sizing of a larger THV.Objectives: To evaluate the outcomes of nominal preparation versus over‐expanding an under‐sized SAPIEN 3 Ultra (S3U) transcatheter heart valve (OE‐THV) in cases with borderline annuli.Methods: 958 patients that underwent TAVR with the S3U at four high‐volume TAVR centers between January 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. 336 patients were identified as borderline annuli size, of which 146 (44%) received OE‐THVs and 190 (56%) received nominal‐sized THVs. The primary composite endpoint included: in‐hospital mortality, aortic injury, moderate/severe paravalvular leak (PVL), permanent pacemaker implant (PPM), stroke, or conversion to surgery.Results: Baseline characteristics were similar except for a larger percentage of females in the OE‐THV (53.42% vs. 42.11%, p = 0.04). TAVR with OE‐THV resulted a reduction in the primary composite endpoint (13.69% vs. 22.63%, p = 0.04). On subgroup analysis, there was no difference between 20 mm OE‐THV versus 23 mm nominal or 23 mm OE‐THV versus 26 mm nominal, but there was a reduction in the primary composite endpoint in patients with larger annuli that received a 26 mm OE‐THV compared to the 29 mm nominally sized THV (9.7% vs. 27.4%, p = 0.02). At 1 month and 1 year follow‐up, there was no significant difference in mortality, PVL rates, NYHA class, and/or KCCQ score.Conclusion: Overinflating a smaller‐sized S3U THV may be a safer option in comparison to nominal sizing in patients with borderline annular area.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been established as a therapeutic option for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who are of intermediate or higher surgical risk. Several periprocedural complications are reduced with newer transcatheter heart valve generations; however, conduction abnormalities and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation have remained unchanged and are the most frequent TAVR complications. The close relationship of the atrioventricular node and left bundle branch to the subaortic region explains these potential conduction abnormalities. This article highlights conduction abnormalities after TAVR with a focus on basic conduction system anatomy in relation to the aortic valve, the mechanism, incidence, predisposing factors for occurrence, impact on mortality and finally, proposed treatment algorithms for management.

Since the inception of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), there have been significant reductions in complications due to improvements of transcatheter heart valve (THV) designs and technologies. Given expanding TAVR applications, reducing complications further and better understanding THV durability has become a focus within the structural heart space. Recently, dedicated cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CTA) performed at 1 month post‐TAVR has identified subclinical leaflet thrombosis (SLT), with rates as high as 40%. From the SLT imaging hallmarks of hypoattenuated leaflet thickening (HALT) to hypoattenuation affecting motion (HAM), a postulated timeline of THV thrombosis advancing to clinical symptoms can be recognized. This review article focuses on leaflet thrombosis particularly following TAVR explaining the spectrum of this disease process, its diagnosis, current treatment options, and future directions in the field.