Martin Töpfer
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Martin Töpfer has a total of 16 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Matěj Konečný
Charles University
5 shared publications - Jana Novotná
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
4 shared publications Jakub Pekárek
Charles University
3 shared publicationsStanislav Kučera
3 shared publications- Stanislav Kučera
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics Charles University in Prague Czech Republic
2 shared publications - Jakub Pekárek
Department of Applied Mathematics Charles University Prague Czechia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 4 July 2019
- Published by The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics in The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics
- Vol. 26 (3) , P3.17
On Grounded L-Graphs and their Relatives
We consider the graph classes Grounded-L and Grounded-{𝖫,⅃} corresponding to graphs that admit an intersection representation by 𝖫-shaped curves (or 𝖫-shaped and ⅃-shaped curves, respectively), where additionally the topmost points of each curve are assumed to belong to a common horizontal line. We prove that Grounded-L graphs admit an equivalent characterisation in terms of vertex ordering with forbidden patterns. We also compare these classes to related intersection classes, such as the grounded segment graphs, the monotone 𝖫-graphs (a.k.a. max point-tolerance graphs), or the outer-1-string graphs. We give constructions showing that these classes are all distinct and satisfy only trivial or previously known inclusions.
- 4 July 2019
- Published by The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics in The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics
- Vol. 26 (3) , P3.17
Open AccessOn Grounded L-Graphs and their Relatives
We consider the graph classes Grounded-L and Grounded-{𝖫,⅃} corresponding to graphs that admit an intersection representation by 𝖫-shaped curves (or 𝖫-shaped and ⅃-shaped curves, respectively), where additionally the topmost points of each curve are assumed to belong to a common horizontal line. We prove that Grounded-L graphs admit an equivalent characterisation in terms of vertex ordering with forbidden patterns. We also compare these classes to related intersection classes, such as the grounded segment graphs, the monotone 𝖫-graphs (a.k.a. max point-tolerance graphs), or the outer-1-string graphs. We give constructions showing that these classes are all distinct and satisfy only trivial or previously known inclusions.
- 1 September 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Discrete Algorithms
- Vol. 52-53, 29-37
Minimal sum labeling of graphs
- 1 September 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Discrete Algorithms
- Vol. 52-53, 29-37
Minimal sum labeling of graphs
- 16 January 2018
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 235-248
On the Simultaneous Minimum Spanning Trees Problem
- 16 January 2018
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 235-248
On the Simultaneous Minimum Spanning Trees Problem
- Open Access
On the Simultaneous Minimum Spanning Trees Problem
Simultaneous Embedding with Fixed Edges (SEFE) is a problem where given $k$ planar graphs we ask whether they can be simultaneously embedded so that the embedding of each graph is planar and common edges are drawn the same. Problems of SEFE type have inspired questions of Simultaneous Geometrical Representations and further derivations. Based on this motivation we investigate the generalization of the simultaneous paradigm on the classical combinatorial problem of minimum spanning trees. Given $k$ graphs with weighted edges, such that they have a common intersection, are there minimum spanning trees of the respective graphs such that they agree on the intersection? We show that the unweighted case is polynomial-time solvable while the weighted case is only polynomial-time solvable for $k=2$ and it is NP-complete for $k\geq 3$.Open AccessOn the Simultaneous Minimum Spanning Trees Problem
Simultaneous Embedding with Fixed Edges (SEFE) is a problem where given $k$ planar graphs we ask whether they can be simultaneously embedded so that the embedding of each graph is planar and common edges are drawn the same. Problems of SEFE type have inspired questions of Simultaneous Geometrical Representations and further derivations. Based on this motivation we investigate the generalization of the simultaneous paradigm on the classical combinatorial problem of minimum spanning trees. Given $k$ graphs with weighted edges, such that they have a common intersection, are there minimum spanning trees of the respective graphs such that they agree on the intersection? We show that the unweighted case is polynomial-time solvable while the weighted case is only polynomial-time solvable for $k=2$ and it is NP-complete for $k\geq 3$. - Open Access
Squarability of rectangle arrangements
We study when an arrangement of axis-aligned rectangles can be transformed into an arrangement of axis-aligned squares in $\mathbb{R}^2$ while preserving its structure. We found a counterexample to the conjecture of J. Klawitter, M. N\"ollenburg and T. Ueckerdt whether all arrangements without crossing and side-piercing can be squared. Our counterexample also works in a more general case when we only need to preserve the intersection graph and we forbid side-piercing between squares. We also show counterexamples for transforming box arrangements into combinatorially equivalent hypercube arrangements. Finally, we introduce a linear program deciding whether an arrangement of rectangles can be squared in a more restrictive version where the order of all sides is preserved.Open AccessSquarability of rectangle arrangements
We study when an arrangement of axis-aligned rectangles can be transformed into an arrangement of axis-aligned squares in $\mathbb{R}^2$ while preserving its structure. We found a counterexample to the conjecture of J. Klawitter, M. N\"ollenburg and T. Ueckerdt whether all arrangements without crossing and side-piercing can be squared. Our counterexample also works in a more general case when we only need to preserve the intersection graph and we forbid side-piercing between squares. We also show counterexamples for transforming box arrangements into combinatorially equivalent hypercube arrangements. Finally, we introduce a linear program deciding whether an arrangement of rectangles can be squared in a more restrictive version where the order of all sides is preserved.